World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
6062
World Ranking
6605
National Ranking
2238

Jeremy T. Bruskotter publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy T. Bruskotter sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 112 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jeremy T. Bruskotter D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy T. Bruskotter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy T. Bruskotter is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States and has published extensively in the field of Environmental Science. Their research focuses on areas such as Ecology, Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers multiple topics related to environmental and wildlife studies, including:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Jeremy T. Bruskotter frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • Conservation Biology
  • Biological Conservation
  • BioScience
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Conservation Science and Practice

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Bruskotter are:

  • The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation, 2020, Conservation Biology
  • Social value shift in favour of biodiversity conservation in the United States, 2020, Nature Sustainability
  • Bringing social values to wildlife conservation decisions, 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • Diverse public perceptions of species' status and management align with conflicting conservation frameworks, 2020, Biological Conservation
  • Emotion as a source of moral understanding in conservation, 2021, Conservation Biology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • John A. Vucetich
  • Kristina M. Slagle
  • L. Mark Elbroch
  • Michael J. Manfredo
  • Neil Carter

Best Publications

  • Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation.

    Michael J. Manfredo;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Tara L. Teel;David C. Fulton

  • Tolerance for Predatory Wildlife

    Adrian Treves;Jeremy Bruskotter

  • Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores

    Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robyn S. Wilson

  • Saving the World's Terrestrial Megafauna

    William J Ripple;Guillaume Chapron;José Vicente López-Bao;Sarah M. Durant

  • Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation

    John A. Vucetich;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Michael Paul Nelson

  • The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy

    Ajay S. Singh;Adam Zwickle;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robyn Wilson

  • Just conservation: What is it and should we pursue it?

    John A. Vucetich;Dawn Burnham;Ewan A. Macdonald;Jeremy T. Bruskotter

  • Attitudes toward wolves in the United States and Canada: A content analysis of the print news media, 1999-2008

    Melanie J. Houston;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;David Fan

  • Changes in attitudes toward animals in the United States from 1978 to 2014

    Kelly A. George;Kristina M. Slagle;Robyn S. Wilson;Steven J. Moeller

  • Emotions and the Ethics of Consequence in Conservation Decisions: Lessons from Cecil the Lion

    Michael Paul Nelson;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;John A. Vucetich;Guillaume Chapron

  • Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents' acceptance of the lethal control of wolves.

    Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Jerry J. Vaske;Robert H. Schmidt

  • The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation.

    Michael J. Manfredo;Tara L. Teel;Andrew W. Don Carlos;Leeann Sullivan

  • The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management

    Kristina M. Slagle;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robyn S. Wilson

  • Predators and the public trust.

    Adrian Treves;Guillaume Chapron;José Vicente López-Bao;Chase Shoemaker

  • Learning to live with black bears: A psychological model of acceptance

    Ryan M. Zajac;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robyn S. Wilson;Suzanne Prange

  • A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Illegal Killing of Large Carnivores

    Neil H. Carter;José Vicente López-Bao;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Meredith Gore

  • Are attitudes toward wolves changing? A case study in Utah

    Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robert H. Schmidt;Tara L. Teel

  • Building tolerance for bears: A communications experiment

    Kristina Slagle;Ryan Zajac;Jeremy Bruskotter;Robyn Wilson

  • Assessing Sustainability Knowledge of a Student Population: Developing a Tool to Measure Knowledge in the Environmental, Economic, and Social Domains

    Adam Zwickle;Tomas M. Koontz;Kristina M. Slagle;Jeremy T. Bruskotter

  • Social value shift in favour of biodiversity conservation in the United States

    Michael J. Manfredo;Tara L. Teel;Richard E. W. Berl;Jeremy T. Bruskotter

  • Bruskotter & Wilson (2013) Determining where the wild things will be - using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores

    Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Robyn S. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Vucetich
John A. Vucetich Michigan Technological University
Michael J. Manfredo
Michael J. Manfredo Colorado State University
Tara L. Teel
Tara L. Teel Colorado State University
Adrian Treves
Adrian Treves University of Wisconsin–Madison
David W. Macdonald
David W. Macdonald University of Oxford
Thomas M. Newsome
Thomas M. Newsome University of Sydney
Guillaume Chapron
Guillaume Chapron Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Shinobu Kitayama
Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
José Vicente López-Bao
José Vicente López-Bao Spanish National Research Council
Mathew S. Crowther
Mathew S. Crowther University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution often explore interdisciplinary fields and related career options. Many discover a growing range of speech pathology bridge programs online, designed for those with non-related undergraduate backgrounds to transition into communication sciences.

For those seeking healthcare roles, there are also accelerated bsn programs for non nurses that offer a fast-track pathway into nursing—ideal for science graduates looking to make a direct impact in patient care.

If you’re considering advanced practice nursing, it’s useful to understand how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make in various states, which can help inform your career planning. Additionally, learning how to become nurse practitioner in the shortest possible time can streamline your transition into this in-demand profession.

With an Ecology and Evolution background, these flexible online programs and alternative pathways open doors to diverse and rewarding careers at the intersection of science and health.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy T. Bruskotter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles