World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
54
Citations
10876
World Ranking
3139
National Ranking
1117

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
11485
World Ranking
1904
National Ranking
907

Daniel J. Decker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Decker sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 267 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Daniel J. Decker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Decker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel J. Decker is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research is centered within the broad field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on several subfields including Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology, and Ecological Modeling.

Their scholarly work covers an array of topics related primarily to wildlife and environmental issues. These topics include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Animal and Plant Science Education

Decker has contributed to multiple papers, several of which engage with wildlife management and conservation challenges. Some recent papers include:

  • "Ratcheting up Rigor in Wildlife Management Decision Making," 2020, published in Wildlife Society Bulletin
  • "Successful Wildlife Conservation Requires Good Governance," 2021, published in Frontiers in Conservation Science
  • "A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision-making," 2023, published in Journal of Wildlife Management
  • "Learning from hunter education volunteers' experiences," 2020, published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife
  • "Human dimensions considerations in wildlife disease management," 2020, published in Techniques and methods

Common publication venues in which Decker's work appears include:

  • Human Dimensions of Wildlife
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin
  • Frontiers in Conservation Science
  • Journal of Wildlife Management
  • Techniques and methods

Frequent collaborators in Decker's research network are:

  • Michael V. Schiavone
  • Ann B. Forstchen
  • William F. Siemer
  • Emily F. Pomeranz
  • Christian A. Smith

Best Publications

  • Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management

    Tania M. Schusler;Daniel J. Decker;Max J. Pfeffer

  • Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior

    Lincoln R. Larson;Richard C. Stedman;Caren B. Cooper;Daniel J. Decker

  • The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys

    Richard C. Stedman;Nancy A. Connelly;Thomas A. Heberlein;Daniel J. Decker

  • Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America

    Daniel J. Decker;T. L. Brown;William F. Siemer

  • Human dimensions of wildlife management

    Daniel J. Decker;Shawn J. Riley;William F. Siemer

  • The essence of wildlife management

    Shawn J. Riley;Daniel J. Decker;Len H. Carpenter;John F Organ

  • HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF LIVING WITH WILDLIFE : A MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

    D. J. Decker;L. C. Chase

  • The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations.

    T. L. Brown;D. J. Decker;S. J. Riley;J. W. Enck

  • Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro‐environmental behavior

    Caren Cooper;Lincoln Larson;Ashley Dayer;Richard Stedman

  • WILDLIFE DAMAGE TO CROPS: PERCEPTIONS OF AGRICULTURAL AND WILDLIFE PROFESSIONALS IN 1957 AND 1987

    Michael R. Conover;Daniel J. Decker

  • Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time

    Nancy A. Connelly;Tommy L. Brown;Daniel J. Decker

  • From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management

    Daniel J. Decker;Charles C. Krueger;Richard A. Baer;Barbara A. Knuth

  • Power in Natural Resources Management: An Application of Theory

    Daniela B. Raik;Arthur L. Wilson;Daniel J. Decker

  • Developing citizens and communities through youth environmental action

    Tania M. Schusler;Marianne E. Krasny;Scott J. Peters;Daniel J. Decker

  • Structural similarity between the lepidoptera- and diptera-specific insecticidal endotoxin genes of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. "kurstaki" and "israelensis".

    L Thorne;F Garduno;T Thompson;D Decker

  • FURTHER INSIGHTS INTO THE MULTIPLE-SATISFACTIONS APPROACH FOR HUNTER MANAGEMENT

    D. J. Decker;T. L. Brown;Ralph J. Gutierrez

  • Public Participation in Wildlife Management: What Do Stakeholders Want?

    Lisa C. Chase;Daniel J. Decker;T. Bruce Lauber

  • Status of hunter recruitment and retention in the United States.

    J. W. Enck;D. J. Decker;T. L. Brown

  • Adaptive Impact Management: An Integrative Approach to Wildlife Management

    Shawn J. Riley;William F. Siemer;Daniel J. Decker;Len H. Carpenter

  • Social Networks and Community-Based Natural Resource Management

    T. Bruce Lauber;Daniel J. Decker;Barbara A. Knuth

  • Risk perception as a factor in Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity for cougars in montana

    Shawn J. Riley;Daniel J. Decker

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard C. Stedman
Richard C. Stedman Cornell University
Shawn J. Riley
Shawn J. Riley Michigan State University
Barbara A. Knuth
Barbara A. Knuth Cornell University
James Shanahan
James Shanahan Indiana University
Marianne E. Krasny
Marianne E. Krasny Cornell University
Ralph J. Gutierrez
Ralph J. Gutierrez University of Minnesota
Meredith L. Gore
Meredith L. Gore Michigan State University
Thomas A. Heberlein
Thomas A. Heberlein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael J. Manfredo
Michael J. Manfredo Colorado State University
James P. Lassoie
James P. Lassoie Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse online education options to fit different goals and timelines. Flexible learning pathways now allow students and professionals to upskill or reskill from anywhere in the world.

For those interested in counseling or research roles, a master in psychology online provides accessible routes to a rewarding career. If you’re aspiring to move into leadership or policy-making within education, pursuing an online edd can fast-track your advancement with flexible scheduling.

Time-sensitive learners might benefit from the 1 year masters programs that cover essential knowledge efficiently, helping you transition rapidly into new roles or industries. Additionally, an online accelerated bachelor degree programs can significantly shorten your undergraduate study period without compromising quality.

These flexible online pathways help students manage education alongside work or family commitments, making it easier than ever to access careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Decker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles