What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Biodiversity
Göran Ericsson mostly deals with Ecology, Demography, Ungulate, Wildlife and Ursus.
Ecology and Monitoring methods are two areas of study in which Göran Ericsson engages in interdisciplinary research.
The Demography study which covers Population size that intersects with Population estimate.
His Ungulate study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Abundance, Forest ecology, Herbivore and Deciduous.
His Wildlife research focuses on Urbanization and how it connects with Recreation, Environmental protection and Cohort effect.
Göran Ericsson combines subjects such as Carnivore and Eurasian lynx with his study of Ursus.
His most cited work include:
- Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back (268 citations)
- A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000) (241 citations)
- A model-driven approach to quantify migration patterns: individual, regional and yearly differences. (228 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Ecology, Environmental resource management, Wildlife and Habitat.
Ecology connects with themes related to Demography in his study.
His studies link Carnivore with Demography.
The concepts of his Ecology study are interwoven with issues in Physical geography, Forestry and Ethnology.
His research investigates the connection between Wildlife and topics such as Socioeconomics that intersect with issues in Urbanization.
The study of Ungulate is intertwined with the study of Abundance in a number of ways.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (38.34%)
- Ecology (29.53%)
- Environmental resource management (15.03%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Ecology (29.53%)
- Ecology (38.34%)
- Environmental resource management (15.03%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Ecology, Environmental resource management, Animal science and Wildlife.
As a member of one scientific family, Göran Ericsson mostly works in the field of Ecology, focusing on Physical geography and, on occasion, Population density, Trapping, Camera trap, Roe deer and Capreolus.
His multidisciplinary approach integrates Ecology and Environmental governance in his work.
His study in Environmental resource management is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Natural, Environmental monitoring, Grazing and Environmental quality.
Göran Ericsson does research in Wildlife, focusing on Wildlife management specifically.
Göran Ericsson works mostly in the field of Wildlife management, limiting it down to concerns involving Ecological systems theory and, occasionally, Habitat.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Pictures or pellets? Comparing camera trapping and dung counts as methods for estimating population densities of ungulates (30 citations)
- Mapping social-ecological systems to understand the challenges underlying wildlife management (24 citations)
- Science-based wildlife disease response. (21 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Biodiversity
Demography, Ecology, Habitat, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Population size are his primary areas of study.
His research on Ecology often connects related areas such as Fecundity.
His research in Habitat tackles topics such as Ecological systems theory which are related to areas like Wildlife.
His Wildlife research incorporates themes from Population density, Trapping and Physical geography.
His work in the fields of Single-nucleotide polymorphism, such as SNP and SNP genotyping, overlaps with other areas such as Zoology and Loss of heterozygosity.
His Population size study incorporates themes from Evolutionary biology, Identification and Sympatric speciation.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
