World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
11325
World Ranking
1826
National Ranking
38

Kjell Danell publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kjell Danell sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 180 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kjell Danell D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kjell Danell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kjell Danell is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on various ecological and biological subfields.

Their work includes contributions to several subfields of study such as Ecology, Animal Science and Zoology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. The research topics they engage with cover a range of ecological and conservation issues including Rangeland and Wildlife Management, Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation.

Kjell Danell has coauthored publications with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Sheila M. Holmes
  • Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt
  • Göran Ericsson
  • Navinder J. Singh
  • Fredrik Widemo

Their recent papers cover topics on wildlife and environmental interactions, including:

  • "Declining recruitment and mass of Swedish moose calves linked to hot, dry springs and snowy winters," published in 2021 in Global Ecology and Conservation
  • "Increased summer temperature is associated with reduced calf mass of a circumpolar large mammal through direct thermoregulatory and indirect, food quality, pathways," published in 2023 in Oecologia

Their work has been published in venues such as Global Ecology and Conservation and Oecologia. These journals reflect the ecological and environmental focus of their research contributions.

Best Publications

  • Reconnecting to the Biosphere

    Carl Folke;Carl Folke;Åsa Jansson;Åsa Jansson;Johan Rockström;Johan Rockström;Per Olsson

  • Interactions between Browsing Moose and Two Species of Birch in Sweden

    Kjell Danell;Kerstin Huss-Danell;Roger Bergstrom

  • Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change.

    F.S. Chapin;G. Peterson;F. Berkes;T. V. Callaghan

  • Feeding by insects and hares on birches earlier affected by moose browsing

    Kjell Danell;Kerstin Huss-Danell

  • Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation

    Kjell Danell;Roger Bergström;Patrick Duncan;John Pastor

  • Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology

    L A Shipley;S Blomquist;K Danell

  • Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches

    Joakim Hjalten;Kjell Danell;Lars Ericson

  • Effects of large mammalian browsers on architecture, biomass, and nutrients of woody plants

    Kjell Danell;Roger Bergström;Lars Edenius

  • Effects of Simulated Winter Browsing by Moose on Morphology and Biomass of Two Birch Species

    Roger Bergstrom;Kjell Danell

  • Herbivore avoidance by association: vole and hare utilization of woody plants

    Joakim Hjalten;Kjell Danell;Per Lundberg

  • Herbivory and Tree Stand Composition: Moose Patch Use in Winter

    Kjell Danell;Lars Edenius;Per Lundberg

  • The Role of Moose as a Disturbance Factor in Managed Boreal Forests

    Lars Edenius;Margareta Bergman;Göran Ericsson;Kjell Danell

  • Response of a herbivore community to increased food quality and quantity: an experiment with nitrogen fertilizer in a boreal forest

    John P. Ball;Kjell Danell;Peter Sunesson

  • Sexual Dimorphism and Biotic Interactions

    Jon Ågren;Kjell Danell;Thomas Elmqvist;Lars Ericson

  • Disturbance by large herbivores in boreal forests with special reference to moose.

    I. L. Persson;K. Danell;R. Bergström;M. Walls

  • Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: Responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates

    H. Gibb;R.B. Pettersson;J. Hjältén;J. Hilszczański;J. Hilszczański

  • Moose Browsing on Scots Pine along a Gradient of Plant Productivity

    Kjell Danell;Pekka Niemela;Tuomo Varvikko;Timo Vuorisalo

  • Science and the Management of Boreal Forest Biodiversity

    Stig Larsson;Kjell Danell

  • Predicting bite size selection of mammalian herbivores: a test of a general model of diet optimization

    L.A. Shipley;A.W. Illius;K. Danell;N.T. Hobbs

  • Building resilience and adaptation to manage Arctic change.

    F. Stuart Chapin;Michael Hoel;Steven R. Carpenter;Jane Lubchenco

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger Bergström
Roger Bergström Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Joakim Hjältén
Joakim Hjältén Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Lars Ericson
Lars Ericson Umeå University
Heloise Gibb
Heloise Gibb La Trobe University
Per Lundberg
Per Lundberg Lund University
Christina Skarpe
Christina Skarpe Høgskolen i Innlandet
Thomas Elmqvist
Thomas Elmqvist Stockholm Resilience Centre
Göran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Pekka Niemelä
Pekka Niemelä University of Turku
Kerstin Huss-Danell
Kerstin Huss-Danell Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Ecology and Evolution often sparks interest in related online programs and future career opportunities. Today, many students explore flexible learning by considering which school is better snhu vs wgu for online science and research degrees. Comparing universities can help you find a program that fits your schedule, budget, and career goals.

For students looking to advance or change careers, bridge programs are widely available. Many search for the bsn to msn online programs format when transitioning between degree levels—this concept applies to science-focused qualifications as well.

Choosing a reputable school is crucial. Opting for nonprofit online colleges can ensure that your degree is recognized and valued by employers, while often providing higher educational standards.

For military members or their families, education benefits can be maximized by selecting from the best online colleges for military. These institutions offer support services and flexibility tailored to military needs, helping you build a solid foundation for ecology, evolution, or broader science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Kjell Danell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles