World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alejandro Jaimes

Alejandro Jaimes

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8434
World Ranking
9179
National Ranking
3906

Alejandro Jaimes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandro Jaimes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 159 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alejandro Jaimes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandro Jaimes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alejandro Jaimes is affiliated with Dataminr in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence and communication. Their work encompasses several subfields including statistical and nonlinear physics, computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as sociology and political science.

Jaimes has published a significant number of papers across diverse topics. The main areas of their research include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Jaimes are:

  • "Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "A Review of Incident Prediction, Resource Allocation, and Dispatch Models for Emergency Management" (2021), published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • "XLTime: A Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer Framework for Temporal Expression Extraction" (2022), published in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022
  • "Leveraging Browsing Patterns for Topic Discovery and Photostream Recommendation" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Clustering of Social Media Messages for Humanitarian Aid Response during Crisis" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Jaimes has frequently published in several venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University), with 12 publications
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, with 2 publications
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

The scientist collaborates often with a core group of coauthors, which includes Joel Tetreault, Ke Zhang, Tanay Kumar Saha, Shihao Ran, and Lu Di.

Best Publications

  • Multimodal human-computer interaction: A survey

    Alejandro Jaimes;Nicu Sebe

  • TVSum: Summarizing web videos using titles

    Yale Song;Jordi Vallmitjana;Amanda Stent;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter

    L. M. Aiello;G. Petkos;C. Martin;D. Corney

  • Social Network Analysis and Mining for Business Applications

    Francesco Bonchi;Carlos Castillo;Aristides Gionis;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Data Mining Methods for Recommender Systems

    Xavier Amatriain;Alejandro Jaimes;Nuria Oliver;Josep M. Pujol

  • Correlating financial time series with micro-blogging activity

    Eduardo J. Ruiz;Vagelis Hristidis;Carlos Castillo;Aristides Gionis

  • Method and system for indexing and content-based adaptive streaming of digital video content

    Shih-Fu Chang;Di Zhong;Raj Kumar;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Video co-summarization: Video summarization by visual co-occurrence

    Wen-Sheng Chu;Yale Song;Alejandro Jaimes

  • TGIF: A New Dataset and Benchmark on Animated GIF Description

    Yuncheng Li;Yale Song;Liangliang Cao;Joel Tetreault

  • Conceptual framework for indexing visual information at multiple levels

    Alejandro Jaimes;Shih-Fu Chang

  • Do all birds tweet the same?: characterizing twitter around the world

    Barbara Poblete;Ruth Garcia;Marcelo Mendoza;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Human-centered computing: a multimedia perspective

    Alejandro Jaimes;Nicu Sebe;Daniel Gatica-Perez

  • Who uses web search for what: and how

    Ingmar Weber;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Memory cues for meeting video retrieval

    Alejandro Jaimes;Kengo Omura;Takeshi Nagamine;Kazutaka Hirata

  • Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power.

    Ruth Garcia-Gavilanes;Daniele Quercia;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Human-Centered Computing--Toward a Human Revolution

    A. Jaimes;D. Gatica-Perez;N. Sebe;T.S. Huang

  • A conceptual framework and empirical research for classifying visual descriptors

    Corinne Jörgensen;Alejandro James;Ana B. Benitez;Shih-Fu Chang

  • Semi-automatic, data-driven construction of multimedia ontologies

    A. Jaimes;J.R. Smith

  • To Click or Not To Click: Automatic Selection of Beautiful Thumbnails from Videos

    Yale Song;Miriam Redi;Jordi Vallmitjana;Alejandro Jaimes

  • Multimedia archive description scheme

    Ana B Benitez;Alejandro Jaimes;Seungyup Paek;Shih-Fu Chang

  • A time-based collective factorization for topic discovery and monitoring in news

    Carmen K. Vaca;Amin Mantrach;Alejandro Jaimes;Marco Saerens

Frequent Co-Authors

Shih-Fu Chang
Shih-Fu Chang Columbia University
Nicu Sebe
Nicu Sebe University of Trento
Yale Song
Yale Song Facebook (United States)
Joel Tetreault
Joel Tetreault Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Amanda Stent
Amanda Stent Colby College
Ingmar Weber
Ingmar Weber Saarland University
John R. Smith
John R. Smith IBM (United States)
Alexander C. Loui
Alexander C. Loui Rochester Institute of Technology
Belle L. Tseng
Belle L. Tseng Apple (United States)
Carlos Castillo
Carlos Castillo Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your skills beyond computer science can open doors in today's job market. Many students consider pursuing an affordable data science degree online to boost their expertise in analytics and machine learning. The flexibility and lower costs of these programs make them attractive for those balancing work and study.

Technical fields like electrical engineering also offer excellent online options. If you're interested in applied technology, explore programs at the top online electrical engineering schools in the USA. These programs can provide a strong foundation in both theory and practical skills, with the added convenience of remote learning.

For a quicker route to career advancement, many professionals opt for easy certifications to get online. These certifications can often be completed in a matter of months and offer a fast track into well-paid tech roles.

If you're aiming for a graduate qualification without spending years in school, consider enrolling in one of the fastest masters degree online programs. Accelerated options like these can help you gain specialized knowledge and credentials efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Alejandro Jaimes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles