World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
38950
World Ranking
12036
National Ranking
6171

Mark H. Stoler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Stoler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 368 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark H. Stoler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Stoler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark H. Stoler is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Epidemiology, Oncology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Microbiology.

The main topics addressed in their body of work include:

  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Among their recent papers are:

  • Efficacy of the bivalent HPV vaccine against HPV 16/18-associated precancer: long-term follow-up results from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial, 2020, published in The Lancet Oncology
  • Analysis of Ugandan cervical carcinomas identifies human papillomavirus clade-specific epigenome and transcriptome landscapes, 2020, published in Nature Genetics
  • molBV reveals immune landscape of bacterial vaginosis and predicts human papillomavirus infection natural history, 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • Looking past PD-L1: expression of immune checkpoint TIM-3 and its ligand galectin-9 in cervical and vulvar squamous neoplasia, 2020, published in Modern Pathology
  • Precancerous cervical lesions caused by non-vaccine-preventable HPV types after vaccination with the bivalent AS04-adjuvanted HPV vaccine: an analysis of the long-term follow-up study from the randomised Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial, 2022, published in The Lancet Oncology

The venues where Mark H. Stoler has frequently published include:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • The Lancet Oncology
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

They have collaborated extensively with coauthors such as:

  • Rolando Herrero
  • Carolina Porras
  • Wim Quint
  • Douglas R. Lowy
  • John T. Schiller

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer

    Debbie Saslow;Diane Solomon;Herschel W. Lawson;Maureen Killackey

  • Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial

    Luisa L. Villa;Ronaldo L.R. Costa;Carlos A. Petta;Rosires P. Andrade

  • The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses.

    John Doorbar;Wim Quint;Lawrence Banks;Ignacio G. Bravo

  • The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

    Teresa M. Darragh;Terence J. Colgan;J. Thomas Cox;Debra S. Heller

  • Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic Interpretations: Realistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study

    Mark H. Stoler;Mark Schiffman

  • HPV Vaccine against Anal HPV Infection and Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

    Joel M. Palefsky;Anna R. Giuliano;Stephen Goldstone;Edson D. Moreira

  • Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology

    Robert J. Kurman;Donald E. Henson;Arthur L. Herbst;Kenneth L. Noller

  • Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases.

    F. Xavier Bosch;Thomas R. Broker;David Forman;Anna Barbara Moscicki

  • Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: End of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test☆

    Thomas C. Wright;Mark H. Stoler;Catherine M. Behrens;Abha Sharma

  • Immunologic responses following administration of a vaccine targeting human papillomavirus Types 6, 11, 16, and 18

    Luisa L. Villa;Kevin A. Ault;Anna R. Giuliano;Ronaldo L.R. Costa

  • Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study

    Philip E Castle;Mark H Stoler;Thomas C Wright;Abha Sharma

  • p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

    Rüdiger Klaes;Axel Benner;Tibor Friedrich;Rüdiger Ridder

  • Astrocyte expression of mRNA encoding cytokines IP-10 and JE/MCP-1 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

    R M Ransohoff;T A Hamilton;M Tani;M H Stoler

  • The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

    Teresa M Darragh;Terence J Colgan;J Thomas Cox;Debra S Heller

  • Discrepancies in Clinical Laboratory Testing of Eligibility for Trastuzumab Therapy: Apparent Immunohistochemical False-Positives Do Not Get the Message

    Raymund R. Tubbs;J. D. Pettay;P. C. Roche;M. H. Stoler

  • Hypoxia induces type II NOS gene expression in pulmonary artery endothelial cells via HIF-1

    Lisa A. Palmer;Gregg L. Semenza;Mark H. Stoler;Roger A. Johns

  • Human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 gene expression in cervical neoplasias.

    Mark H. Stoler;Cheryl R. Rhodes;Cheryl R. Rhodes;April Whitbeck;April Whitbeck;Steven M. Wolinsky;Steven M. Wolinsky

  • Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a study of 33 cases emphasizing its pathologic, immunophenotypic, and biologic uniqueness from juvenile hemangioma.

    Lisa L Lyons;Paula E North;Fernand Mac-Moune Lai;Mark H Stoler

  • Human papillomavirus. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

    Richart Rm;Masood S;Syrjänen Kj;Vassilakos P

  • Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic Interpretations

    Mark H. Stoler;Mark Schiffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Wright
Thomas C. Wright Columbia University
Philip E. Castle
Philip E. Castle National Institutes of Health
Mark Schiffman
Mark Schiffman National Institutes of Health
Anna R. Giuliano
Anna R. Giuliano University of South Florida
Raymond R. Tubbs
Raymond R. Tubbs Cleveland Clinic
Luisa L. Villa
Luisa L. Villa Universidade de São Paulo
Irving L. Kron
Irving L. Kron University of Virginia
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London
Stacey E. Mills
Stacey E. Mills University of Virginia
Robert J. Kurman
Robert J. Kurman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the medical field can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways beyond the traditional MD. Many students are turning to advanced nursing programs and specialized tracks that offer flexibility and faster timelines. For those aiming to earn the highest nursing credential efficiently, options like the shortest dnp programs online provide a route to leadership roles without a lengthy commitment.

Prospective nurses looking for approachable programs might consider easy dnp programs that still meet licensure requirements but feature flexible learning and accessible admission criteria. If you’re seeking an even quicker start in healthcare, fast track medical programs can help you qualify for entry-level roles like LPNs in less time.

For those drawn to mental health care, online master’s programs such as the psych np programs offer fast, specialized preparation to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. These pathways provide strong alternatives for anyone considering a medical career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Stoler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles