World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12035 11323 6170 5712 368 38950

Mark H. Stoler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark H. Stoler between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark H. Stoler published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 10 of the 387 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1983 2025

387 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark H. Stoler: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 3
1988 6
1989 3
1990 6
1991 8
1992 6
1993 4
1994 7
1995 10
1996 6
1997 4
1998 18
1999 6
2000 12
2001 13
2002 11
2003 6
2004 6
2005 10
2006 9
2007 12
2008 5
2009 10
2010 14
2011 10
2012 10
2013 14
2014 14
2015 25
2016 13
2017 20
2018 11
2019 17
2020 11
2021 10
2022 8
2023 13
2024 5
2025 5
Total 387
Download as CSV

Mark H. Stoler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Stoler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 368 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 368
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark H. Stoler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Stoler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark H. Stoler is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Epidemiology, Oncology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Microbiology.

The main topics addressed in their body of work include:

  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Among their recent papers are:

  • Efficacy of the bivalent HPV vaccine against HPV 16/18-associated precancer: long-term follow-up results from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial, 2020, published in The Lancet Oncology
  • Analysis of Ugandan cervical carcinomas identifies human papillomavirus clade-specific epigenome and transcriptome landscapes, 2020, published in Nature Genetics
  • molBV reveals immune landscape of bacterial vaginosis and predicts human papillomavirus infection natural history, 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • Looking past PD-L1: expression of immune checkpoint TIM-3 and its ligand galectin-9 in cervical and vulvar squamous neoplasia, 2020, published in Modern Pathology
  • Precancerous cervical lesions caused by non-vaccine-preventable HPV types after vaccination with the bivalent AS04-adjuvanted HPV vaccine: an analysis of the long-term follow-up study from the randomised Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial, 2022, published in The Lancet Oncology

The venues where Mark H. Stoler has frequently published include:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • The Lancet Oncology
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

They have collaborated extensively with coauthors such as:

  • Rolando Herrero
  • Carolina Porras
  • Wim Quint
  • Douglas R. Lowy
  • John T. Schiller

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer

    Debbie Saslow;Diane Solomon;Herschel W. Lawson;Maureen Killackey

  • Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial

    Luisa L. Villa;Ronaldo L.R. Costa;Carlos A. Petta;Rosires P. Andrade

  • The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses.

    John Doorbar;Wim Quint;Lawrence Banks;Ignacio G. Bravo

  • The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

    Teresa M. Darragh;Terence J. Colgan;J. Thomas Cox;Debra S. Heller

  • Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic Interpretations: Realistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study

    Mark H. Stoler;Mark Schiffman

  • HPV Vaccine against Anal HPV Infection and Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

    Joel M. Palefsky;Anna R. Giuliano;Stephen Goldstone;Edson D. Moreira

  • Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology

    Robert J. Kurman;Donald E. Henson;Arthur L. Herbst;Kenneth L. Noller

  • Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases.

    F. Xavier Bosch;Thomas R. Broker;David Forman;Anna Barbara Moscicki

  • Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: End of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test☆

    Thomas C. Wright;Mark H. Stoler;Catherine M. Behrens;Abha Sharma

  • Immunologic responses following administration of a vaccine targeting human papillomavirus Types 6, 11, 16, and 18

    Luisa L. Villa;Kevin A. Ault;Anna R. Giuliano;Ronaldo L.R. Costa

  • Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study

    Philip E Castle;Mark H Stoler;Thomas C Wright;Abha Sharma

  • p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

    Rüdiger Klaes;Axel Benner;Tibor Friedrich;Rüdiger Ridder

  • Astrocyte expression of mRNA encoding cytokines IP-10 and JE/MCP-1 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

    R M Ransohoff;T A Hamilton;M Tani;M H Stoler

  • The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.

    Teresa M Darragh;Terence J Colgan;J Thomas Cox;Debra S Heller

  • Discrepancies in Clinical Laboratory Testing of Eligibility for Trastuzumab Therapy: Apparent Immunohistochemical False-Positives Do Not Get the Message

    Raymund R. Tubbs;J. D. Pettay;P. C. Roche;M. H. Stoler

  • Hypoxia induces type II NOS gene expression in pulmonary artery endothelial cells via HIF-1

    Lisa A. Palmer;Gregg L. Semenza;Mark H. Stoler;Roger A. Johns

  • Human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 gene expression in cervical neoplasias.

    Mark H. Stoler;Cheryl R. Rhodes;Cheryl R. Rhodes;April Whitbeck;April Whitbeck;Steven M. Wolinsky;Steven M. Wolinsky

  • Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a study of 33 cases emphasizing its pathologic, immunophenotypic, and biologic uniqueness from juvenile hemangioma.

    Lisa L Lyons;Paula E North;Fernand Mac-Moune Lai;Mark H Stoler

  • Human papillomavirus. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

    Richart Rm;Masood S;Syrjänen Kj;Vassilakos P

  • Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic Interpretations

    Mark H. Stoler;Mark Schiffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Wright
Thomas C. Wright Columbia University
Philip E. Castle
Philip E. Castle National Institutes of Health
Mark Schiffman
Mark Schiffman National Institutes of Health
Anna R. Giuliano
Anna R. Giuliano University of South Florida
Raymond R. Tubbs
Raymond R. Tubbs Cleveland Clinic
Luisa L. Villa
Luisa L. Villa Universidade de São Paulo
Irving L. Kron
Irving L. Kron University of Virginia
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London
Stacey E. Mills
Stacey E. Mills University of Virginia
Robert J. Kurman
Robert J. Kurman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the medical field can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways beyond the traditional MD. Many students are turning to advanced nursing programs and specialized tracks that offer flexibility and faster timelines. For those aiming to earn the highest nursing credential efficiently, options like the shortest dnp programs online provide a route to leadership roles without a lengthy commitment.

Prospective nurses looking for approachable programs might consider easy dnp programs that still meet licensure requirements but feature flexible learning and accessible admission criteria. If you’re seeking an even quicker start in healthcare, fast track medical programs can help you qualify for entry-level roles like LPNs in less time.

For those drawn to mental health care, online master’s programs such as the psych np programs offer fast, specialized preparation to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. These pathways provide strong alternatives for anyone considering a medical career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Stoler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles