World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
30791
World Ranking
13564
National Ranking
6898

Thomas C. Wright publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 270 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas C. Wright D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas C. Wright is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has conducted research spanning engineering and medicine. Their work primarily intersects the fields of mechanics of materials, political science and international relations, polymers and plastics, mechanical engineering, and surgery.

The scientist's publication record includes recent contributions in a variety of venues, with a focus on topics related to textile materials, biomedical applications, and diagnostics. Key publication venues where they have contributed multiple works are the Journal of Wound Care, Textile Research Journal, Journal of Cleaner Production, Friction, and Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik.

Notable papers authored or coauthored by Thomas C. Wright include:

  • Surface coated cellulose fibres as a biobased alternative to functional synthetic fibres, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Improving the ultraviolet protection factor of textiles through mechanical surface modification using calendering, 2021, Textile Research Journal
  • Ice friction: A brief review of the influencing factors and experimental methods, 2025, Friction
  • Enhanced Efficiency in Coefficient of Friction Evaluation through Automated Data Processing, 2023, Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik
  • Adaptive Algorithm for Automated CoF Evaluation in Reciprocating Friction Tests, 2025, Tribology Letters

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Igor Velkavrh, Thomas Bechtold, Fevzi Kafexhiu, Natalie Phillips, and Alicia Bernhard.

Their research interest encompasses the following main topics:

  • Textile materials and evaluations
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Skin Protection and Aging
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Best Publications

  • 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological Abnormalities

    Thomas C. Wright;J. Thomas Cox;L. Stewart Massad;Leo B. Twiggs

  • Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.

    Sue J. Goldie;Lynne Gaffikin;Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert;Amparo Gordillo-Tobar

  • HPV DNA Testing of Self‐Collected Vaginal Samples Compared With Cytologic Screening To Detect Cervical Cancer

    Thomas C. Wright;Lynette Denny;Louise Kuhn;Amy Pollack

  • Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening.

    Thomas C. Wright;Mark Schiffman;Diane Solomon;J. Thomas Cox

  • Projected Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Vaccine

    Sue J. Goldie;Michele Kohli;Daniel Grima;Milton C. Weinstein

  • The carcinogenicity of human papillomavirus types reflects viral evolution

    Mark Schiffman;Rolando Herrero;Rob DeSalle;Allan Hildesheim

  • The 2001 Bethesda system: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology

    Diane Solomon;Diane Davey;Robert Kurman;Ann Moriarty

  • Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

    X. W. Sun;L. Kuhn;T V Ellerbrock;M A Chiasson

  • 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests

    Thomas C. Wright;L. Stewart Massad;Charles J. Dunton;Mark Spitzer

  • Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: End of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test☆

    Thomas C. Wright;Mark H. Stoler;Catherine M. Behrens;Abha Sharma

  • Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study

    Philip E Castle;Mark H Stoler;Thomas C Wright;Abha Sharma

  • 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ

    Thomas C. Wright;L. Stewart Massad;Charles J. Dunton;Mark Spitzer

  • Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial

    Michael Böhm;Kazuomi Kario;David E. Kandzari;Felix Mahfoud;Felix Mahfoud

  • 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests

    Wright Tc;Massad Ls;Dunton Cj;Spitzer M

  • Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness.

    Sue J. Goldie;Louise Kuhn;Lynette Denny;Amy Pollack

  • Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial.

    Lynette Denny;Louise Kuhn;Michelle De Souza;Amy E. Pollack

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with human immunodeficiency virus: prevalence, risk factors, and validity of Papanicolaou smears. New York Cervical Disease Study.

    T. C. Wright;T. V. Ellerbrock;T. V. Ellerbrock;M. A. Chiasson;M. A. Chiasson;N. Van Devanter

  • Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix

    Thomas C. Wright;Robert J. Kurman;Alex Ferenczy

  • High-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with ASC-US cytology: results from the ATHENA HPV study.

    Mark H. Stoler;Thomas C. Wright;Abha Sharma;Raymond Apple

  • 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

    Thomas C. Wright;J.Thomas Cox;L.Stewart Massad;Jay Carlson

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Stoler
Mark H. Stoler University of Virginia
Morris J. Karnovsky
Morris J. Karnovsky Harvard University
Sue J. Goldie
Sue J. Goldie Harvard University
Attila T. Lorincz
Attila T. Lorincz Queen Mary University of London
Landon Myer
Landon Myer University of Cape Town
Eduardo L. Franco
Eduardo L. Franco McGill University
Jeffrey L. Lennox
Jeffrey L. Lennox Emory University
Teresa L. Wright
Teresa L. Wright GlaxoSmithKline (United States)
Saul Silverstein
Saul Silverstein Columbia University
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Medicine in the USA, exploring alternative or complementary health-related degrees can open new career doors. Many students and professionals find that online healthcare programs offer the flexibility and affordability needed to advance or shift their career paths.

Mental health is a growing field, and psychiatric np programs online provide a route to become a specialized nurse practitioner, working closely with patients facing mental health challenges. These programs suit those looking to make a direct impact in clinical settings.

For those interested in leadership or the business side of healthcare, cost is a significant concern. Searching for a healthcare administration degree cost breakdown can help you find an affordable entry point into healthcare management. Students looking to keep expenses low may investigate the cheapest online mha programs, which deliver master's-level training at a reduced price.

Advanced practice nurses might seek the cheapest online dnp programs to earn a terminal degree in nursing practice, enhancing their clinical expertise and career potential.

These online options allow greater flexibility, lower costs, and access to a variety of rewarding healthcare roles beyond traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas C. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles