World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8382
World Ranking
7556
National Ranking
450

Joel Tetreault publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Tetreault sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 135 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joel Tetreault D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Tetreault sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joel Tetreault is affiliated with Yahoo in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the domain of computer science, with a significant emphasis on artificial intelligence. Additional areas of study include computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, management science and operations research, and communication.

The scientist's work spans a range of topics, most notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication

Joel Tetreault has contributed to several academic conferences and journals, with frequent publications appearing in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022

Recent papers published by Joel Tetreault include:

  • The CoNLL-2013 Shared Task on Grammatical Error Correction, 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Evaluating the Evaluation Metrics for Style Transfer: A Case Study in Multilingual Formality Transfer, 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarization, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • XLTime: A Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer Framework for Temporal Expression Extraction, 2022, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022
  • An Exploration of Post-Editing Effectiveness in Text Summarization, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

The scientist has collaborated frequently with various coauthors throughout their career. Notable collaborators include:

  • Alejandro Jaimes
  • Ke Zhang
  • Hemank Lamba
  • Alison Smith
  • Tanay Kumar Saha

Best Publications

  • Abusive Language Detection in Online User Content

    Chikashi Nobata;Joel Tetreault;Achint Thomas;Yashar Mehdad

  • Dear Sir or Madam, May I Introduce the GYAFC Dataset: Corpus, Benchmarks and Metrics for Formality Style Transfer

    Sudha Rao;Joel R. Tetreault

  • Re-examining Machine Translation Metrics for Paraphrase Identification

    Nitin Madnani;Joel Tetreault;Martin Chodorow

  • Do Characters Abuse More Than Words

    Yashar Mehdad;Joel R. Tetreault

  • TGIF: A New Dataset and Benchmark on Animated GIF Description

    Yuncheng Li;Yale Song;Liangliang Cao;Joel Tetreault

  • Automated Grammatical Error Correction for Language Learners

    Joel Tetreault;Claudia Leacock

  • The CoNLL-2013 Shared Task on Grammatical Error Correction

    Hwee Tou Ng;Siew Mei Wu;Yuanbin Wu;Christian Hadiwinoto

  • The Ups and Downs of Preposition Error Detection in ESL Writing

    Joel R. Tetreault;Martin Chodorow

  • TOEFL11: A CORPUS OF NON‐NATIVE ENGLISH

    Daniel Blanchard;Joel Tetreault;Derrick Higgins;Aoife Cahill

  • Detection of Grammatical Errors Involving Prepositions

    Martin Chodorow;Joel Tetreault;Na-Rae Han

  • Detecting Sarcasm in Multimodal Social Platforms

    Rossano Schifanella;Paloma de Juan;Joel Tetreault;LiangLiang Cao

  • A Report on the First Native Language Identification Shared Task

    Joel Tetreault;Daniel Blanchard;Aoife Cahill

  • It Depends: Dependency Parser Comparison Using A Web-based Evaluation Tool

    Jinho D. Choi;Joel Tetreault;Amanda Stent

  • Ground Truth for Grammaticality Correction Metrics

    Courtney Napoles;Keisuke Sakaguchi;Matt Post;Joel Tetreault

  • JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correction

    Courtney Napoles;Keisuke Sakaguchi;Joel R. Tetreault

  • A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution

    Joel R. Tetreault

  • The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment:

    Martin Chodorow;Michael Gamon;Joel Tetreault

  • Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging

    Henriette Cramer;Paloma de Juan;Joel Tetreault

  • An Empirical Analysis of Formality in Online Communication

    Ellie Pavlick;Joel R. Tetreault

  • Using System and User Performance Features to Improve Emotion Detection in Spoken Tutoring Dialogs

    Hua Ai;Diane J. Litman;Katherine Forbes-Riley;Mihai Rotaru

  • Yara Parser: A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser

    Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli;Joel R. Tetreault

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Chodorow
Martin Chodorow City University of New York
Jill Burstein
Jill Burstein Princeton University
Diane J. Litman
Diane J. Litman University of Pittsburgh
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
Liangliang Cao
Liangliang Cao Google (United States)
Amanda Stent
Amanda Stent Colby College
Michael Gamon
Michael Gamon Microsoft (United States)
Jiebo Luo
Jiebo Luo University of Rochester
Dragomir R. Radev
Dragomir R. Radev Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA unlocks diverse opportunities, and exploring related online degrees can help expand your career options. For those interested in the intersection of computer science and the justice system, pursuing the cheapest online phd in criminal justice could be a strategic move. This path combines technology skills with knowledge of criminology and justice administration.

If you have an aptitude for numbers, an accredited online accounting degree is a practical choice. Accountants with strong computing backgrounds are in high demand for roles in data analytics, auditing, and financial technology.

The tech industry also has a significant need for advanced data specialists. An online masters in data science can complement a computer science background, preparing you for high-paying roles in areas such as AI, big data, and machine learning.

Lastly, if you are interested in building and infrastructure, consider a construction management degree online. This field increasingly relies on digital project management and smart technologies, making computer science skills highly valuable.

Best Scientists Citing Joel Tetreault

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles