World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4907
World Ranking
11741
National Ranking
737

John Vines publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Vines sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John Vines D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Vines sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Vines is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily within the social sciences, with a focus on the interaction between humans and technology. Their work covers 26 publications concentrated in areas intersecting sociology, political science, health professions, and human-computer interaction.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Miglena Campbell (6 collaborations)
  • Katie L. Hackett (6 collaborations)
  • Tim Rapley (5 collaborations)
  • Martine van Driel (4 collaborations)
  • Belén Barros Pena (4 collaborations)

John Vines has contributed to multiple publication venues, with notable recurrent appearances in:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (4 publications)
  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference (3 publications)
  • Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2 publications)
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2 publications)
  • BMC Geriatrics (1 publication)

Their research addresses several main fields and subfields, including:

  • Social Sciences
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Demography
  • Education

They focus on topics related to technology use and its effects, particularly in vulnerable populations and health contexts, such as:

  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Examples of recent papers authored or coauthored by John Vines include:

  • "A systematic review of physical-digital play technology and developmentally relevant child behaviour," 2021, published in International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
  • "Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review," 2023, published in BMC Geriatrics
  • "Digital interventions for subjective and objective social isolation among individuals with mental health conditions: a scoping review," 2022, published in BMC Psychiatry
  • "'Pick Someone Who Can Kick Your Ass' - Moneywork in Financial Third Party Access," 2021, published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Designing Technology-Mediated Peer Support for Postgraduate Research Students at Risk of Loneliness and Isolation," 2022, published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Best Publications

  • An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research

    John Vines;Gary Pritchard;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design

    John Vines;Rachel Clarke;Peter Wright;John McCarthy

  • On Speculative Enactments

    Chris Elsden;David Chatting;Abigail C. Durrant;Andrew Garbett

  • Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings

    John Vines;Mark Blythe;Stephen Lindsay;Paul Dunphy

  • Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction

    Cosmin Munteanu;Heather Molyneaux;Wendy Moncur;Mario Romero

  • Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson's

    Roisin McNaney;John Vines;Daniel Roggen;Madeline Balaam

  • Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI

    Chris Elsden;Arthi Manohar;Jo Briggs;Mike Harding

  • Cheque mates: participatory design of digital payments with eighty somethings

    John Vines;Mark Blythe;Paul Dunphy;Vasillis Vlachokyriakos

  • Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities

    Janis Lena Meissner;John Vines;Janice McLaughlin;Thomas Nappey

  • Coping with loneliness at University: A qualitative interview study with students in the UK

    Konstantina Vasileiou;Julie Barnett;Manuela Barreto;John Vines

  • Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems

    John Vines;Stephen Lindsay;Gary W. Pritchard;Mabel Lie

  • Ticket to Talk: Supporting Conversation between Young People and People with Dementia through Digital Media

    Daniel Welsh;Kellie Morrissey;Sarah Foley;Roisin McNaney

  • The joy of cheques: trust, paper and eighty somethings

    John Vines;Paul Dunphy;Mark Blythe;Stephen Lindsay

  • Pay or delay: the role of technology when managing a low income

    John Vines;Paul Dunphy;Andrew Monk

  • Unfolding participation over time: temporal lenses in participatory design

    Joanna Saad-Sulonen;Eva Eriksson;Kim Halskov;Helena Karasti

  • Special topic: Designing for and with vulnerable people

    John Vines;Róisín McNaney;Stephen Lindsay;Jayne Wallace

  • Eighty something: banking for the older old

    John Vines;Mark Blythe;Paul Dunphy;Andrew Monk

  • Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios

    Pam Briggs;Mark Blythe;John Vines;Stephen Lindsay

  • Your Money's No Good Here: The Elimination of Cash Payment on London Buses

    Gary Pritchard;John Vines;Patrick Olivier

  • "Could You Define That in Bot Terms"?: Requesting, Creating and Using Bots on Reddit

    Kiel Long;John Vines;Selina Sutton;Phillip Brooker

  • Designing for- and with- vulnerable people

    John Vines;Roisin McNaney;Rachel Clarke;Stephen Lindsay

  • Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data

    Chris Elsden;Bettina Nissen;Andrew Garbett;David Chatting

  • Ethical Encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings

    Jenny Waycott;Hilary Davis;Anja Thieme;Stacy Branham

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Olivier
Patrick Olivier Monash University
Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
Mark Blythe
Mark Blythe Northumbria University
Manuela Barreto
Manuela Barreto University of Exeter
Michael T. Wilson
Michael T. Wilson University of Essex
Emma Flynn
Emma Flynn Durham University
David Kirk
David Kirk Newcastle University
Nigel Davies
Nigel Davies Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens many doors in both education and industry. For those interested in engineering, there are numerous accredited online electrical engineering programs that blend technical skills with real-world applications, often allowing for flexible study schedules.

If you’re aiming to upskill quickly, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These short-term certifications can lead to lucrative positions and a rapid career boost in IT and related fields.

For those seeking an advanced degree without a long commitment, fastest masters degree online options are available. These programs are tailored for working professionals, allowing you to earn a Master’s without putting your life or career on hold.

Unsure which advanced degree will offer the best return? Review the what masters program should i do guide, which details the most in-demand and valuable graduate programs. This resource can help you align your studies with today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing John Vines

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles