World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
8246
World Ranking
8749
National Ranking
267

Jenny Waycott publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenny Waycott sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jenny Waycott D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenny Waycott sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jenny Waycott is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a notable focus on subfields including demography, social psychology, human-computer interaction, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their work centers on several main topics, reflecting a strong emphasis on technology use by older adults and aging-related research. Key topical areas include technology use by older adults, aging and gerontology research, virtual reality applications and impacts, music therapy and health, dementia and cognitive impairment research, social robot interaction and human-robot interaction, and artificial intelligence in service interactions.

Jenny Waycott has contributed to a variety of publication venues. Frequent venues for their research include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • JMIR Aging
  • Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • Australasian Journal on Ageing

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Ryan Kelly
  • Steven Baker
  • Jeanette Tamplin
  • Tanara Vieira Sousa
  • Phoebe Stretton-Smith

Recent publications by Jenny Waycott reflect diverse interests within human-computer interaction and aging. Some notable papers include:

  • "The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings," 2024, Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • "The harm in conflating aging with accessibility," 2021, Communications of the ACM
  • "Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With Technologies for Health Self-management: Interview Study," 2023, JMIR Aging
  • "Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company," 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "The Role of Staff in Facilitating Immersive Virtual Reality for Enrichment in Aged Care: An Ethic of Care Perspective," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Jenny Waycott's research contributions focus heavily on analyzing how older adults engage with technology, especially in contexts related to health self-management, accessibility, and immersive virtual reality in aged care. Their work also touches on broader psychological and social dimensions of aging and technology, including dignity and autonomy.

Best Publications

  • Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study

    Sue Bennett;Andrea Bishop;Barney Dalgarno;Jenny Waycott

  • Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies

    Jenny Waycott;Sue Bennett;Gregor Kennedy;Barney Dalgarno

  • WP 4 - GUIDELINES FOR LEARNING/TEACHING/TUTORING IN A MOBILE ENVIRONMENT

    Claire O'Malley;Giasemi Vavoula;Jp Glew;Josie Taylor

  • Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students

    Gregor E. Kennedy;Terry S. Judd;Barney Dalgarno;Jenny Waycott

  • The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings

    Gregor Kennedy;Barney Dalgarno;Kathleen Gray;Terry Judd

  • Towards a task model for mobile learning: a dialectical approach

    Josie Taylor;Mike Sharples;Claire O'Malley;Giasemi Vavoula

  • Educating the Net Generation – A Handbook of Findings for Practice and Policy

    Gregor Kennedy;Barney Dalgarno;Sue Bennett;Kathleen Gray

  • Students' experiences with PDAs for reading course materials

    J. Waycott;A. Kukulska-Hulme

  • Mobile technologies: prospects for their use in learning in informal science settings

    Eileen Scanlon;Ann C. Jones;Jenny Waycott

  • Older adults as digital content producers

    Jenny Waycott;Frank Vetere;Sonja Pedell;Lars Kulik

  • Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the ‘age-based digital divide’:

    Barbara Barbosa Neves;Jenny Waycott;Sue Malta

  • Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: A systematic review of existing evidence

    Steven Baker;Jeni Warburton;Jenny Waycott;Frances Batchelor

  • Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods

    S Cox;S Drew;M Guillemin;C Howell

  • Evaluating the use of interactive virtual reality technology with older adults living in residential aged care

    Steven Baker;Jenny Waycott;Elena Robertson;Romina Carrasco

  • PDAs as lifelong learning tools: an activity theory based analysis

    Jenny Waycott;Ann Jones;Eileen Scanlon

  • Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention

    Jenny Waycott;Frank Vetere;Sonja Pedell;Amee Morgans

  • Interrogating Social Virtual Reality as a Communication Medium for Older Adults

    Steven Baker;Ryan M. Kelly;Jenny Waycott;Romina Carrasco

  • Making students' work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse?

    Jenny Waycott;Judithe Sheard;Celia Thompson;Rosemary Clerehan

  • Avatar-Mediated Communication in Social VR: An In-depth Exploration of Older Adult Interaction in an Emerging Communication Platform

    Steven Baker;Jenny Waycott;Romina Carrasco;Ryan M. Kelly

  • Playing Blind: Revealing the World of Gamers with Visual Impairment

    Ronny Andrade;Melissa J. Rogerson;Jenny Waycott;Steven Baker

  • Making science real: photo-sharing in biology and chemistry

    Jenny Waycott;Barney Dalgarno;Gregor Kennedy;Andrea Bishop

  • The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings from a large cross-institutional study

    Gregor Kennedy;Barney Dalgarno;K Gray;T Judd

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Gregor Kennedy
Gregor Kennedy University of Melbourne
Lars Kulik
Lars Kulik University of Melbourne
Eileen Scanlon
Eileen Scanlon The Open University
Sue Bennett
Sue Bennett University of Wollongong
Margot Brereton
Margot Brereton Queensland University of Technology
Mark Levene
Mark Levene Birkbeck, University of London
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
Jeni Warburton
Jeni Warburton La Trobe University
Steven Prawer
Steven Prawer University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields offering high-demand career opportunities. Many universities now offer flexible online degree options in complementary areas of technology and engineering.

For those interested in sustainability, pursuing an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can be a great fit—balancing tech skills with environmental stewardship. Mechanical engineering is another in-demand field; understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is crucial for planning your academic journey.

If physics is your passion, you might wonder: can you get a physics degree online? Thanks to advances in remote learning, accredited online programs are making this possible for more students. Additionally, data science continues to grow in importance. For a cost-effective route to this career, consider the cheapest master in data science to help you get started in analytics and AI.

Exploring these online study options expands your career horizons, providing the technical foundation and flexibility needed to excel in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jenny Waycott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles