World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8149 7524 3492 3157 109 5666

Seo Yeon Yoon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Seo Yeon Yoon between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Seo Yeon Yoon published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 11 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Seo Yeon Yoon: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 1
2010 7
2011 2
2012 9
2013 10
2014 8
2015 6
2016 10
2017 9
2018 7
2019 11
2020 10
2021 18
2022 8
2023 17
2024 12
2025 10
2026 1
Total 173
Download as CSV

Seo Yeon Yoon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seo Yeon Yoon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 109 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 109
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Seo Yeon Yoon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seo Yeon Yoon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Seo Yeon Yoon is affiliated with the Gladstone Institutes in the United States, contributing extensively to the field of Medicine with a focus on Neurology, Physiology, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Surgery.

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Neuronal ApoE upregulates MHC-I expression to drive selective neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Experimental and real-world evidence supporting the computational repurposing of bumetanide for APOE4-related Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Nature Aging
  • "Neuronal APOE4 removal protects against tau-mediated gliosis, neurodegeneration and myelin deficits," 2023, Nature Aging
  • "The APOE-R136S mutation protects against APOE4-driven Tau pathology, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation," 2023, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Association of Physical Activity, Including Amount and Maintenance, With All-Cause Mortality in Parkinson Disease," 2021, JAMA Neurology

Seo Yeon Yoon frequently collaborates with other researchers in related fields, including:

  • Yong Wook Kim
  • Yadong Huang
  • Yanxia Hao
  • Seung Nam Yang
  • Nicole Koutsodendris

Their publications appear often in a select group of scientific journals and platforms, such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain & Neurorehabilitation
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Aging
  • Cell Reports

Seo Yeon Yoon's body of work, focused primarily on neurological diseases and mechanisms, includes a multitude of studies on neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases as well as stroke recovery. Their research integrates cellular and molecular neuroscience approaches with clinical perspectives, highlighting the intersection of basic science and applied medical research.

Best Publications

  • Gain of toxic apolipoprotein E4 effects in human iPSC-derived neurons is ameliorated by a small-molecule structure corrector

    Chengzhong Wang;Ramsey Najm;Qin Xu;Dah-eun Jeong

  • Apolipoprotein E4 Causes Age- and Tau-Dependent Impairment of GABAergic Interneurons, Leading to Learning and Memory Deficits in Mice

    Yaisa Andrews-Zwilling;Nga Bien-Ly;Qin Xu;Gang Li

  • Evidence that spinal astrocytes but not microglia contribute to the pathogenesis of Paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy.

    Haijun Zhang;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hongmei Zhang;Patrick M. Dougherty

  • Apolipoprotein E4 Causes Age-Dependent Disruption of Slow Gamma Oscillations during Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples

    Anna K. Gillespie;Emily A. Jones;Emily A. Jones;Yuan-Hung Lin;Yuan-Hung Lin;Mattias P. Karlsson

  • Intrathecal injection of the ς1 receptor antagonist BD1047 blocks both mechanical allodynia and increases in spinal NR1 expression during the induction phase of rodent neuropathic pain

    Dae Hyun Roh;Hyun Woo Kim;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hyoung Sig Seo

  • Neuronal ApoE upregulates MHC-I expression to drive selective neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

    Kelly A Zalocusky;Ramsey Najm;Alice L Taubes;Yanxia Hao

  • Reducing Human Apolipoprotein E Levels Attenuates Age-Dependent Aβ Accumulation in Mutant Human Amyloid Precursor Protein Transgenic Mice

    Nga Bien-Ly;Anna K. Gillespie;David Walker;Seo Yeon Yoon

  • Activation of the spinal sigma‐1 receptor enhances NMDA‐induced pain via PKC‐ and PKA‐dependent phosphorylation of the NR1 subunit in mice

    Kim Hw;Roh Dh;Yoon Sy;Seo Hs

  • Induction of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) and Its Receptor CCR2 in Primary Sensory Neurons Contributes to Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

    Haijun Zhang;Jessica A. Boyette-Davis;Alyssa K. Kosturakis;Yan Li

  • Spinal Astrocyte Gap Junctions Contribute to Oxaliplatin-Induced Mechanical Hypersensitivity

    Seo Yeon Yoon;Caleb R. Robinson;Haijun Zhang;Patrick M. Dougherty

  • Acupoint Stimulation Using Bee Venom Attenuates Formalin-Induced Pain Behavior and Spinal Cord Fos Expression in Rats

    Hyun Woo Kim;Young Bae Kwon;Tae Won Ham;Dae Hyun Roh

  • Inhibitory interneuron progenitor transplantation restores normal learning and memory in ApoE4 knock-in mice without or with Aβ accumulation.

    Leslie M. Tong;Biljana Djukic;Christine Arnold;Anna K. Gillespie

  • Intrathecal treatment with σ1 receptor antagonists reduces formalin-induced phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 1 and the second phase of formalin test in mice

    Hyun Woo Kim;Young Bae Kwon;Dae Hyun Roh;Seo Yeon Yoon

  • Neuronal APOE4 removal protects against tau-mediated gliosis, neurodegeneration and myelin deficits

    Unknown

  • Apolipoprotein E4 Causes Age- and Sex-Dependent Impairments of Hilar GABAergic Interneurons and Learning and Memory Deficits in Mice

    Laura Leung;Yaisa Andrews-Zwilling;Seo Yeon Yoon;Sachi Jain

  • Hilar GABAergic interneuron activity controls spatial learning and memory retrieval.

    Yaisa Andrews-Zwilling;Anna K. Gillespie;Alexxai V. Kravitz;Alexandra B. Nelson

  • Apolipoprotein E4 Produced in GABAergic Interneurons Causes Learning and Memory Deficits in Mice

    Johanna Knoferle;Seo Yeon Yoon;David Walker;Laura Leung

  • Acupoint stimulation with diluted bee venom (apipuncture) alleviates thermal hyperalgesia in a rodent neuropathic pain model: Involvement of spinal alpha2-adrenoceptors

    Dae Hyun Roh;Young Bae Kwon;Hyun Woo Kim;Tae Won Ham

  • Intrathecal injection of carbenoxolone, a gap junction decoupler, attenuates the induction of below-level neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury in rats.

    Dae Hyun Roh;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hyoung Sig Seo;Suk Yun Kang

  • The APOE-R136S mutation protects against APOE4-driven Tau pathology, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation

    Unknown

  • Early Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripple Deficits Predict Later Learning and Memory Impairments in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model.

    Emily A. Jones;Anna K. Gillespie;Seo Yeon Yoon;Loren M. Frank;Loren M. Frank

  • Low-frequency electroacupuncture suppresses carrageenan-induced paw inflammation in mice via sympathetic post-ganglionic neurons, while high-frequency EA suppression is mediated by the sympathoadrenal medullary axis.

    Hyun Woo Kim;Dong Kyu Uh;Seo Yeon Yoon;Dae Hyun Roh

  • Spinal neuronal NOS activation mediates sigma-1 receptor-induced mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in mice: involvement of PKC-dependent GluN1 phosphorylation

    Dae Hyun Roh;Sheu Ran Choi;Seo Yeon Yoon;Suk Yun Kang

  • The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Low- and High-Frequency Electroacupuncture Are Mediated by Peripheral Opioids in a Mouse Air Pouch Inflammation Model

    Hyun Woo Kim;Dae Hyun Roh;Seo Yeon Yoon;Seuk Yun Kang

  • σ1 receptors activate astrocytes via p38 MAPK phosphorylation leading to the development of mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain.

    J Y Moon;D H Roh;S Y Yoon;S R Choi

  • Intrathecal clonidine suppresses phosphorylation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR1 subunit in spinal dorsal horn neurons of rats with neuropathic pain.

    Dae Hyun Roh;Hyun Woo Kim;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hyoung Sig Seo

  • An increase in spinal dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) enhances NMDA-induced pain via phosphorylation of the NR1 subunit in mice: involvement of the sigma-1 receptor.

    Seo Yeon Yoon;Dae Hyun Roh;Hyoung Sig Seo;Suk Yun Kang

  • Spinal sigma-1 receptors activate NADPH oxidase 2 leading to the induction of pain hypersensitivity in mice and mechanical allodynia in neuropathic rats.

    Sheu Ran Choi;Dae Hyun Roh;Seo Yeon Yoon;Suk Yun Kang

  • Intrathecal administration of sigma-1 receptor agonists facilitates nociception: involvement of a protein kinase C-dependent pathway.

    Dae Hyun Roh;Hyun Woo Kim;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hyoung Sig Seo

  • Depletion of capsaicin sensitive afferents prevents lamina-dependent increases in spinal N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit 1 expression and phosphorylation associated with thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathic rats

    Dae Hyun Roh;Hyun Woo Kim;Seo Yeon Yoon;Hyoung Sig Seo

  • Acupoint stimulation with diluted bee venom (apipuncture) potentiates the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in the rodent formalin test and in a neuropathic pain model.

    Seo Yeon Yoon;Dae Hyun Roh;Young Bae Kwon;Hyun Woo Kim

  • Bee venom injection significantly reduces nociceptive behavior in the mouse formalin test via capsaicin-insensitive afferents.

    Dae Hyun Roh;Hyun Woo Kim;Seo Yeon Yoon;Seuk Yun Kang

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvin J. Beitz
Alvin J. Beitz University of Minnesota
Ho Jae Han
Ho Jae Han Seoul National University
Seog Bae Oh
Seog Bae Oh Seoul National University
Patrick M. Dougherty
Patrick M. Dougherty The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jin Mo Chung
Jin Mo Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Bong-Kiun Kaang
Bong-Kiun Kaang Seoul National University
Heung Sik Na
Heung Sik Na Korea University
Edgar T. Walters
Edgar T. Walters The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Hee-Sup Shin
Hee-Sup Shin Institute for Basic Science
Young Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related fields and online programs. Professionals often blend neuroscience knowledge with social work, psychology, or behavioral analysis to broaden their impact. For those seeking advanced social work training, affordable msw programs online offer flexibility and competitive tuition, making them attractive for career shifters or upskillers.

Aspiring behavioral health specialists may consider bcba coursework online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts—a pathway closely connected to neurological study and interventions. If time is a factor, social work accelerated program options allow students to enter the workforce sooner while still gaining a rigorous education.

Additionally, many students interested in neuroscience foundations benefit from completing a 2-year psychology degree online, which can quickly prepare graduates for entry-level roles or further specialized study. Exploring these diverse and accessible online options helps students align their academic journey with future goals in neuroscience and allied professions.

Best Scientists Citing Seo Yeon Yoon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles