World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dieter O. Fürst

Dieter O. Fürst

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
13362
World Ranking
9265
National Ranking
681

Dieter O. Fürst publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter O. Fürst sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 170 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dieter O. Fürst D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter O. Fürst sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter O. Fürst is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany. Their research spans biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, cellular and molecular neuroscience, cell biology, and physiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the understanding of cardiomyopathy, myosin studies, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, muscle physiology and disorders, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, heat shock proteins research, cardiovascular effects of exercise, and cellular transport and secretion.

The following are some of the recent publications by Dieter O. Fürst:

  • Maintaining proteostasis under mechanical stress, 2021, EMBO Reports
  • Phosphoproteomics identifies dual-site phosphorylation in an extended basophilic motif regulating FILIP1-mediated degradation of filamin-C, 2020, Communications Biology
  • Homozygous expression of the myofibrillar myopathy-associated p.W2710X filamin C variant reveals major pathomechanisms of sarcomeric lesion formation, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Overexpression of human BAG3P209L in mice causes restrictive cardiomyopathy, 2021, Nature Communications
  • FLNC-Associated Myofibrillar Myopathy, 2021, Neurology Genetics

Dieter O. Fürst frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Peter F. M. van der Ven
  • Julia Schuld
  • Bettina Warscheid
  • Keerthika Lohanadan
  • Kristina Djinović-Carugo

The scientist's work is published in various academic venues with multiple contributions to:

  • Nature Communications
  • Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
  • Cells
  • EMBO Reports
  • Communications Biology

Best Publications

  • The organization of titin filaments in the half-sarcomere revealed by monoclonal antibodies in immunoelectron microscopy: a map of ten nonrepetitive epitopes starting at the Z line extends close to the M line.

    D O Fürst;M Osborn;R Nave;K Weber

  • Chaperone-assisted selective autophagy is essential for muscle maintenance

    Verena Arndt;Nikolaus Dick;Riga Tawo;Michael Dreiseidler

  • Structural basis for activation of the titin kinase domain during myofibrillogenesis

    O. Mayans;P. F. M. Van Der Ven;M. Wilm;A. Mues

  • Myogenesis in the mouse embryo: differential onset of expression of myogenic proteins and the involvement of titin in myofibril assembly.

    D O Fürst;M Osborn;K Weber

  • Molecular structure of the sarcomeric M band: mapping of titin and myosin binding domains in myomesin and the identification of a potential regulatory phosphorylation site in myomesin

    Wolfgang M.J. Obermann;Mathias Gautel;Klaus Weber;Dieter O. Fürst;Dieter O. Fürst

  • A Mutation in the Dimerization Domain of Filamin C Causes a Novel Type of Autosomal Dominant Myofibrillar Myopathy

    Matthias Vorgerd;Peter F.M. van der Ven;Peter F.M. van der Ven;Vera Bruchertseifer;Thomas Löwe

  • Cellular mechanotransduction relies on tension-induced and chaperone-assisted autophagy.

    Anna Ulbricht;Felix J. Eppler;Victor E. Tapia;Peter F.M. van der Ven

  • Mutations in the Human Muscle LIM Protein Gene in Families With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Christian Geier;Andreas Perrot;Cemil Özcelik;Priska Binner

  • The structure of the sarcomeric M band: Localization of defined domains of myomesin, M-protein, and the 250-kD carboxy-terminal region of titin by immunoelectron microscopy

    W. M. J. Obermann;M. Gautel;F. Steiner;P. F. M. Van Der Ven

  • Localization of filamin in smooth muscle.

    J V Small;D O Fürst;J De Mey

  • The central Z-disk region of titin is assembled from a novel repeat in variable copy numbers

    Mathias Gautel;David Goulding;Belinda Bullard;Klaus Weber

  • Indications for a Novel Muscular Dystrophy Pathway: γ-Filamin, the Muscle-Specific Filamin Isoform, Interacts with Myotilin

    Peter F.M. van der Ven;Sebastian Wiesner;Paula Salmikangas;Daniel Auerbach

  • Myotilin, the limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 1A (LGMD1A) protein, cross-links actin filaments and controls sarcomere assembly

    Paula Salmikangas;Peter F.M. van der Ven;Maciej Lalowski;Anu Taivainen

  • The cytoskeletal lattice of muscle cells.

    J. Victor Small;Dieter O. Fürst;Lars-Eric Thornell

  • Characterization of muscle filamin isoforms suggests a possible role of gamma-filamin/ABP-L in sarcomeric Z-disc formation.

    Peter F. M. van der Ven;Wolfgang M. J. Obermann;Britt Lemke;Mathias Gautel

  • Two immunoglobulin-like domains of the Z-disc portion of titin interact in a conformation-dependent way with telethonin

    Alexander Mues;Peter F.M van der Ven;Paul Young;Dieter O Fürst

  • Visualization of the polarity of isolated titin molecules: a single globular head on a long thin rod as the M band anchoring domain?

    R Nave;D O Fürst;K Weber

  • The mode of myofibril remodelling in human skeletal muscle affected by DOMS induced by eccentric contractions

    Ji-Guo Yu;Dieter O. Fürst;Lars-Eric Thornell

  • Transient association of titin and myosin with microtubules in nascent myofibrils directed by the MURF2 RING-finger protein.

    Véronique Pizon;Andrei Iakovenko;Peter F. M. van der Ven;Raymond Kelly

  • The spectrum of pathology in central core disease.

    C.A. Sewry;C. Muller;M. Davis;J.S.M. Dwyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Weber
Klaus Weber Max Planck Society
Mathias Gautel
Mathias Gautel King's College London
Lev G. Goldfarb
Lev G. Goldfarb National Institutes of Health
Jonel Trebicka
Jonel Trebicka University Hospital of Münster
Elisabeth Ehler
Elisabeth Ehler King's College London
Wolfgang A. Linke
Wolfgang A. Linke University of Münster
Katrin Marcus
Katrin Marcus Ruhr University Bochum
Tilman Sauerbruch
Tilman Sauerbruch University of Bonn
Hanns Lochmüller
Hanns Lochmüller University of Freiburg
Martin Tegenthoff
Martin Tegenthoff Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dieter O. Fürst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles