World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 66 2270 2201 1135 1094 449 25316

Lucila Ohno-Machado publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lucila Ohno-Machado between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucila Ohno-Machado published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2017. 28 of the 577 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2017. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 17 publications
1993 2025

577 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lucila Ohno-Machado: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 3
1997 5
1998 7
1999 16
2000 14
2001 14
2002 21
2003 13
2004 15
2005 14
2006 9
2007 10
2008 9
2009 11
2010 14
2011 27
2012 38
2013 30
2014 34
2015 21
2016 35
2017 43
2018 28
2019 14
2020 27
2021 23
2022 24
2023 24
2024 11
2025 17
Total 577
Download as CSV

Lucila Ohno-Machado publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucila Ohno-Machado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 442–451 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 449 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108 449
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Lucila Ohno-Machado D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucila Ohno-Machado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249 66
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2007 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Lucila Ohno-Machado is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with significant contributions across several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and General Health Professions.

Their work covers multiple topical areas such as Machine Learning in Healthcare, Ethics in Clinical Research, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Microscopic Colitis, and Data Quality and Management.

Frequent coauthors in Lucila Ohno-Machado's research include:

  • Andrea H. Ramirez
  • Kelsey Mayo
  • Sheri D. Schully
  • Kelly A. Gebo
  • Tsung-Ting Kuo

The primary venues where this researcher frequently publishes include the following:

  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Significant recent papers authored with publication year and venue are:

  • "A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models", 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity", 2022, Patterns
  • "Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing", 2020, Nature Genetics
  • "Guiding Principles to Address the Impact of Algorithm Bias on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health Care", 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • "Severe aortic stenosis detection by deep learning applied to echocardiography", 2023, European Heart Journal

Lucila Ohno-Machado has been recognized with memberships and fellowships including being a Member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2018 and a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering since 2007.

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review

    Stephan Dreiseitl;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • Natural language processing: an introduction.

    Prakash M. Nadkarni;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Wendy Webber Chapman

  • Big Data In Health Care: Using Analytics To Identify And Manage High-Risk And High-Cost Patients

    David W. Bates;Suchi Saria;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Anand Shah

  • Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications

    Tsung-Ting Kuo;Hyeon-Eui Kim;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics

    Thomas A. Lasko;Jui G. Bhagwat;Kelly H. Zou;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies

    Winston Patrick Kuo;Tor Kristian Jenssen;Atul J. Butte;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines.

    Lucila Ohno-Machado;John H. Gennari;Shawn N. Murphy;Nilesh L. Jain

  • Reviewing social media use by clinicians.

    Marcio von Muhlen;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format.

    Mor Peleg;Aziz A. Boxwala;Omolola Ogunyemi;Qing T. Zeng

  • A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models.

    Yingxiang Huang;Wentao Li;Fima Macheret;Rodney A Gabriel

  • A comparison of machine learning methods for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions

    Stephan Dreiseitl;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Harald Kittler;Staal Vinterbo

  • Comparison of blockchain platforms: a systematic review and healthcare examples.

    Tsung-Ting Kuo;Hugo Zavaleta Rojas;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing.

    Luca Bonomi;Yingxiang Huang;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • ModelChain: Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Healthcare Predictive Modeling Framework on Private Blockchain Networks

    Tsung-Ting Kuo;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • "Big data" and the electronic health record.

    M. K. Ross;Wei Wei;L. Ohno-Machado

  • Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): building shared models without sharing data.

    Yuan Wu;Xiaoqian Jiang;Jihoon Kim;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • Calibrating predictive model estimates to support personalized medicine.

    Xiaoqian Jiang;Melanie Osl;Jihoon Kim;Lucila Ohno-Machado

  • Comparing three-class diagnostic tests by three-way ROC analysis.

    Stephan Dreiseitl;Lucila Ohno-Machado;Michael Binder

  • A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies

    Winston Patrick Kuo;Winston Patrick Kuo;Fang Liu;Jeff Trimarchi;Claudio Punzo

  • Modeling medical prognosis: survival analysis techniques

    Lucila Ohno-Machado

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaoqian Jiang
Xiaoqian Jiang The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Robert A. Greenes
Robert A. Greenes Arizona State University
Siddharth Singh
Siddharth Singh University of California, San Diego
Hua Xu
Hua Xu Yale University
William J. Sandborn
William J. Sandborn University of California, San Diego
Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University
Jane C. Burns
Jane C. Burns University of California, San Diego
Li Xiong
Li Xiong Emory University
Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Susanna-Assunta Sansone University of Oxford
Haixu Tang
Haixu Tang Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring easy certifications to get can be a smart starting point for those seeking quick entry into tech careers. Many certifications now offer flexibility through online platforms and can lead to well-paying roles, even without a full degree.

For students aiming to advance rapidly, consider enrolling in one of the shortest online masters degree programs. These accelerated options can help working professionals upgrade their skills and employability in as little as one year.

It’s important to choose credentials that align with career demand. Insights into masters degrees that are worth it reveal that certain specializations lead to better job prospects and higher salaries in the tech sector.

If you’re looking for a faster, two-year option, 2 year online degrees in computer science or IT can also open doors to entry-level tech positions, and often serve as stepping stones to further studies.

Best Scientists Citing Lucila Ohno-Machado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles