World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

J. Don Read publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Don Read between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Don Read published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2007. 1 of the 78 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2007. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1975 2026

78 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Don Read: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 5
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 3
2003 0
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 8
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 3
2012 1
2013 3
2014 5
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 78
Download as CSV

J. Don Read publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Don Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Don Read D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Don Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Don Read is affiliated with the University of East London in the United Kingdom. Their academic activities are linked to this institution.

There are no recent papers listed for J. Don Read in the provided data, and no frequent co-authors are documented.

Information about frequent publication venues is not available.

The available data does not include details on book publications, main fields of study, or subfields of study connected to this researcher.

No specific topics of research work are mentioned, nor are there any recorded academic awards attributed to J. Don Read.

Best Publications

  • Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories

    Kimberley A. Wade;Maryanne Garry;J. Don Read;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • True Photographs and False Memories

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Lisa Hagen;J. Don Read;Kimberley A. Wade

  • Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

    John R. Vokey;J. Don Read

  • From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.

    J. Don Read

  • Accuracy and Confidence in Person Identification: The Relationship Is Strong When Witnessing Conditions Vary Widely

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read;Kusum Sharma

  • Subliminal messages. Between the devil and the media.

    John R. Vokey;J. Don Read

  • "Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Current Trends and Developments

    David Frank Ross;J. Don Read;Michael P. Toglia

  • Recollections of Trauma: Scientific Evidence and Clinical Practice

    J. Don Read;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • After 30 Years, What Do We Know about What Jurors Know? A Meta-Analytic Review of Lay Knowledge Regarding Eyewitness Factors

    Sarah L. Desmarais;J. Don Read

  • Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports.

    M Nieves Pérez-Mata;J Don Read;Margarita Diges

  • The relation between confidence and accuracy in eyewitness identification studies: Is the conclusion changing?

    J. Don Read;D. Stephen Lindsay;Tonia Nicholls

  • The availability heuristic in person identification: The sometimes misleading consequences of enhanced contextual information

    J. Don Read

  • Recollections of a Robbery Effects of Arousal and Alcohol upon Recall and Person Identification

    J. Don Read;John C. Yuille;Patricia Tollestrup

  • Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Elizabeth S. Nilsen;J. Don Read

  • Longitudinal tracking of difficult memory retrievals

    J. Don Read;Darryl Bruce

  • Changing photos of faces: effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy−confidence relationship

    J. Don Read;John R. Vokey;Richard Hammersley

  • Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives.

    Charles P. Thompson;Douglas J. Herrmann;J. Don Read;Darryl Bruce

  • Delayed prosecutions of historic child sexual abuse: analyses of 2064 Canadian criminal complaints

    Deborah A. Connolly;J. Don Read

  • Recalling more childhood events leads to judgments of poorer memory: Implications for the recovered/false memory debate

    Robert F. Belli;Piotr Winkielman;J. Don Read;Norbert Schwarz

Frequent Co-Authors

D. Stephen Lindsay
D. Stephen Lindsay University of Victoria
Sarah L. Desmarais
Sarah L. Desmarais North Carolina State University
Maryanne Garry
Maryanne Garry University of Waikato
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Cathy Spatz Widom
Cathy Spatz Widom City University of New York
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
John Briere
John Briere University of Southern California
John C. Yuille
John C. Yuille University of British Columbia
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in pursuing psychology in the USA? Online degrees in counseling and related fields are rapidly growing. These programs offer flexibility and can lead to rewarding careers in various settings, from schools to private practice. As demand for mental health professionals increases, online pathways can provide efficient access to education and open doors to counseling and therapy roles.

Choosing where to study can make a significant difference. Regional factors and local job markets may matter when selecting a degree. For example, you may want to explore the most valuable counseling degrees in Philadelphia or the most valuable counseling degrees in Seattle to find top-ranked programs matching your goals.

If you are considering studying in the southern or midwestern United States, check out the most valuable counseling programs in Texas and the most valuable counseling degrees in Wisconsin. These resources can help you compare program quality, earnings outlook, and specialization options, positioning you for greater career success in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing J. Don Read

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles