World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4937
World Ranking
9891
National Ranking
5221

Sarah L. Desmarais publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Desmarais sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sarah L. Desmarais D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Desmarais sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah L. Desmarais is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a focused interest in subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and general health professions.

Their scholarly contributions encompass a range of topics, prominently including:

  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Several academic outlets frequently feature their work. These venues include:

  • Criminal Justice and Behavior
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • Military Psychology
  • International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
  • Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

Among their more recent publications are:

  • Predictive Validity of Pretrial Risk Assessments: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2020, Criminal Justice and Behavior
  • The Empirical Case for Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments, 2021, Criminal Justice and Behavior

Additional notable papers include:

  • It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators within their scholarly network are:

  • Samantha A. Zottola
  • Sam Cacace
  • Sarah Clarke
  • Evan M. Lowder
  • Katherine Warburton

Sarah L. Desmarais has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Cambridge University Press titled Decriminalizing Mental Illness in 2021.

Best Publications

  • International Perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment : a global survey of 44 countries

    Jay P. Singh;Sarah L. Desmarais;Cristina Hurducas;Karin Arbach-Lucioni

  • Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration.

    Sarah L. Desmarais;Kim A. Reeves;Tonia L. Nicholls;Robin P. Telford

  • The Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) A Prospective Validation Study in a Forensic Psychiatric Sample

    Tonia L. Nicholls;Johann Brink;Sarah L. Desmarais;Christopher D. Webster

  • Community Violence Perpetration and Victimization Among Adults With Mental Illnesses

    Sarah L. Desmarais;Richard A. Van Dorn;Kiersten L. Johnson;Kevin J. Grimm

  • Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme.

    Christopher D. Webster;Tonia L. Nicholls;Mary-Lou Martin;Sarah L. Desmarais

  • Using Dynamic Risk and Protective Factors to Predict Inpatient Aggression: Reliability and Validity of START Assessments

    Sarah L. Desmarais;Tonia L. Nicholls;Catherine M. Wilson;Johann Brink

  • Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: a second-order systematic review

    Jay P. Singh;Sarah L. Desmarais;Richard A. Van Dorn

  • A meta-analysis of public attitudes toward ex-offenders.

    Candalyn B. Rade;Sarah L. Desmarais;Roger E. Mitchell

  • Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients

    Catherine M. Wilson;Sarah L. Desmarais;Tonia L. Nicholls;Stephen D. Hart

  • After 30 Years, What Do We Know about What Jurors Know? A Meta-Analytic Review of Lay Knowledge Regarding Eyewitness Factors

    Sarah L. Desmarais;J. Don Read

  • The State of Scientific Knowledge Regarding Factors Associated With Terrorism.

    Sarah L. Desmarais;Joseph Simons-Rudolph;Christine Shahan Brugh;Eileen Schilling

  • Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings.

    Sarah L Desmarais;Kiersten L Johnson;Jay P Singh

  • Sexual Coercion Practices Among Undergraduate Male Recreational Athletes, Intercollegiate Athletes, and Non-Athletes

    Belinda-Rose Young;Sarah L. Desmarais;Julie A. Baldwin;Rasheeta Chandler

  • Perceptions and experiences of people with mental illness regarding their interactions with police.

    James D. Livingston;Sarah L. Desmarais;Simon Verdun-Jones;Richard Parent

  • From Risk Assessment to Risk Management: Matching Interventions to Adolescent Offenders' Strengths and Vulnerabilities.

    Jay P. Singh;Sarah L. Desmarais;Brian G. Sellers;Tatiana Hylton

  • The Role of Client Strengths in Assessments of Violence Risk Using the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START)

    Catherine M. Wilson;Sarah L. Desmarais;Tonia L. Nicholls;Johann Brink

  • Intimate partner abuse before and during pregnancy as risk factors for postpartum mental health problems.

    Sarah L Desmarais;Ashley Pritchard;Evan M Lowder;Patricia A Janssen

  • Effects of Outpatient Treatment on Risk of Arrest of Adults With Serious Mental Illness and Associated Costs

    Richard A. Van Dorn;Sarah L. Desmarais;John Petrila;Diane Haynes

  • Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis.

    Evan M. Lowder;Candalyn B. Rade;Sarah L. Desmarais

  • Assessment of multiple risk outcomes, strengths, and change with the START:AV: a short-term prospective study with adolescent offenders

    Jodi L. Viljoen;Jennifer L. Beneteau;Erik Gulbransen;Etta Brodersen

  • Risk of arrest in persons with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in a Florida Medicaid program: the role of atypical antipsychotics, conventional neuroleptics, and routine outpatient behavioral health services.

    Richard A. Van Dorn;Ross Andel;Timothy L. Boaz;Sarah L. Desmarais

  • Peer-support intervention for postpartum depression: Participant satisfaction and program effectiveness

    Betty-Shannon Prevatt;Evan M. Lowder;Sarah L. Desmarais

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Van Dorn
Richard A. Van Dorn Policy Research Associates
Marvin S. Swartz
Marvin S. Swartz Duke University
Kevin J. Grimm
Kevin J. Grimm Arizona State University
John Petrila
John Petrila University of South Florida
Martin Grann
Martin Grann Karolinska Institute
Corine de Ruiter
Corine de Ruiter Maastricht University
Robert J. Cramer
Robert J. Cramer University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Michael W. Doyle
Michael W. Doyle Columbia University
Kevin S. Douglas
Kevin S. Douglas Simon Fraser University
J. Don Read
J. Don Read University of East London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous online study options and diverse career pathways. Many accredited universities now offer online bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology, allowing for flexibility and convenience. These programs often serve as a first step for those interested in clinical practice or counseling careers.

If your goal is to become a licensed professional counselor, it’s important to understand that licensing requirements can vary by state and city. For example, the Chandler licensed therapist requirements emphasize specific educational and supervised experience standards. Similarly, the Charlotte licensed therapist education requirements detail unique steps for those seeking licensure in North Carolina.

Those considering careers in Virginia must meet the licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake, which may differ from other regions. In Illinois, becoming a licensed therapist in Chicago involves another set of specific criteria. It’s crucial to research your desired location’s requirements when choosing your educational and career path.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah L. Desmarais

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles