World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
D. Stephen Lindsay

D. Stephen Lindsay

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4347 4018 288 267 150 14772

D. Stephen Lindsay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by D. Stephen Lindsay between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. D. Stephen Lindsay published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1995. 6 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1995. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1985 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
D. Stephen Lindsay: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 4
1992 0
1993 3
1994 6
1995 8
1996 3
1997 8
1998 7
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 4
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 4
2009 6
2010 3
2011 3
2012 5
2013 4
2014 7
2015 4
2016 6
2017 6
2018 6
2019 4
2020 7
2021 5
2022 2
2023 7
2024 1
2025 5
Total 162
Download as CSV

D. Stephen Lindsay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Stephen Lindsay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

D. Stephen Lindsay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Stephen Lindsay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

D. Stephen Lindsay is a researcher affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology as predominant subfields. Lindsay's research addresses various specialized areas including memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, as well as social and intergroup psychology.

Their body of work includes publications in several notable venues, with frequent contributions to the Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, Memory & Cognition, and Memory. These journals reflect Lindsay's engagement with research on memory, cognition, and applied psychological science.

Prominent topics within Lindsay's research encompass memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, social and intergroup psychology, child and animal learning development, psychological and educational research studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and face recognition and perception. These themes highlight a multidisciplinary approach incorporating both psychological theory and applied forensic aspects.

Frequent collaborators in Lindsay's research include Eric Y. Mah, Kaitlyn M. Fallow, Ira E. Hyman, Mario J. Baldassari, and Kara N. Moore. Collaboration patterns suggest a focus on cognitive and memory psychology intersecting with social and forensic contexts.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lindsay include:

  • Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science, 2020, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility, 2023, Meta-Psychology

Additionally, Lindsay has been indirectly associated with other research publications on topics related to cognition and psychology, appearing alongside senior authors such as Megan E. Graham and Eric Y. Mah, reflecting ongoing engagement in contemporary psychological investigations.

Best Publications

  • Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers:

    Daniel J. Simons;Yuichi Shoda;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Marcia K. Johnson

  • Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions

    Colleen M . Kelley;D.Stephen Lindsay

  • Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories

    Kimberley A. Wade;Maryanne Garry;J. Don Read;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Developmental changes in memory source monitoring.

    D.Stephen Lindsay;Marcia K Johnson;Paul Kwon

  • Misleading Suggestions Can Impair Eyewitnesses' Ability to Remember Event Details

    D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference.

    D S Lindsay;L L Jacoby

  • Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events

    Debra A. Poole;D.Stephen Lindsay

  • True Photographs and False Memories

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Lisa Hagen;J. Don Read;Kimberley A. Wade

  • Psychotherapy and the Recovery of Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse: U.S. and British Practitioners' Opinions, Practices, and Experiences

    Debra A. Poole;D. Stephen Lindsay;Amina Memon;Ray Bull

  • Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations

    Larry L. Jacoby;D. Stephen Lindsay;Sandra Hessels

  • Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents.

    Debra Ann Poole;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Replication in Psychological Science

    D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Accuracy and Confidence in Person Identification: The Relationship Is Strong When Witnessing Conditions Vary Widely

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read;Kusum Sharma

  • Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals

    Robert F. Belli;D. Stephen Lindsay;Maria S. Gales;Thomas T. McCarthy

  • Other-race face perception.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Philip C. Jack;Marcus A. Christian

  • "Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies

    Alan Scoboria;Kimberley A. Wade;D. Stephen Lindsay;Tanjeem Azad

  • Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness

    Eryn J. Newman;Maryanne Garry;Daniel M. Bernstein;Justin Kantner

  • The Process-Dissociation Procedure and Similarity: Defining and Estimating Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory

    Vincenza Gruppuso;D. Stephen Lindsay;Colleen M. Kelley

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Don Read
J. Don Read University of East London
Maryanne Garry
Maryanne Garry University of Waikato
Marcia K. Johnson
Marcia K. Johnson Yale University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Michael E. J. Masson
Michael E. J. Masson University of Victoria
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Daniel M. Bernstein
Daniel M. Bernstein Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Roger A. Dixon
Roger A. Dixon University of Alberta
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career options and flexible study opportunities. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer high-quality online programs tailored to different needs and locations.

Factors to consider when choosing an online psychology bachelor's program include curriculum focus, faculty expertise, support services for online students, and accreditation status. Regional offerings, such as the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Cincinnati and best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania, can help you compare top-rated regional schools.

State-wide options are also plentiful. For example, check out online psychology bachelor's programs in Illinois and online psychology bachelor's programs in New York to see how each state supports distance learning and professional development in psychology.

Earning a psychology degree online can pave the way for roles such as counselor, human resources specialist, or case manager. Graduates may also choose to specialize further with advanced degrees or certifications, depending on their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing D. Stephen Lindsay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles