World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
D. Stephen Lindsay

D. Stephen Lindsay

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14772
World Ranking
4347
National Ranking
288

D. Stephen Lindsay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Stephen Lindsay sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

D. Stephen Lindsay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Stephen Lindsay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

D. Stephen Lindsay is a researcher affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology as predominant subfields. Lindsay's research addresses various specialized areas including memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, as well as social and intergroup psychology.

Their body of work includes publications in several notable venues, with frequent contributions to the Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, Memory & Cognition, and Memory. These journals reflect Lindsay's engagement with research on memory, cognition, and applied psychological science.

Prominent topics within Lindsay's research encompass memory processes and influences, deception detection and forensic psychology, social and intergroup psychology, child and animal learning development, psychological and educational research studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and face recognition and perception. These themes highlight a multidisciplinary approach incorporating both psychological theory and applied forensic aspects.

Frequent collaborators in Lindsay's research include Eric Y. Mah, Kaitlyn M. Fallow, Ira E. Hyman, Mario J. Baldassari, and Kara N. Moore. Collaboration patterns suggest a focus on cognitive and memory psychology intersecting with social and forensic contexts.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lindsay include:

  • Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science, 2020, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility, 2023, Meta-Psychology

Additionally, Lindsay has been indirectly associated with other research publications on topics related to cognition and psychology, appearing alongside senior authors such as Megan E. Graham and Eric Y. Mah, reflecting ongoing engagement in contemporary psychological investigations.

Best Publications

  • Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers:

    Daniel J. Simons;Yuichi Shoda;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Marcia K. Johnson

  • Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions

    Colleen M . Kelley;D.Stephen Lindsay

  • Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories

    Kimberley A. Wade;Maryanne Garry;J. Don Read;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Developmental changes in memory source monitoring.

    D.Stephen Lindsay;Marcia K Johnson;Paul Kwon

  • Misleading Suggestions Can Impair Eyewitnesses' Ability to Remember Event Details

    D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference.

    D S Lindsay;L L Jacoby

  • Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events

    Debra A. Poole;D.Stephen Lindsay

  • True Photographs and False Memories

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Lisa Hagen;J. Don Read;Kimberley A. Wade

  • Psychotherapy and the Recovery of Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse: U.S. and British Practitioners' Opinions, Practices, and Experiences

    Debra A. Poole;D. Stephen Lindsay;Amina Memon;Ray Bull

  • Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations

    Larry L. Jacoby;D. Stephen Lindsay;Sandra Hessels

  • Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents.

    Debra Ann Poole;D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Replication in Psychological Science

    D. Stephen Lindsay

  • Accuracy and Confidence in Person Identification: The Relationship Is Strong When Witnessing Conditions Vary Widely

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read;Kusum Sharma

  • Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals

    Robert F. Belli;D. Stephen Lindsay;Maria S. Gales;Thomas T. McCarthy

  • Other-race face perception.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Philip C. Jack;Marcus A. Christian

  • "Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues.

    D. Stephen Lindsay;J. Don Read

  • A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies

    Alan Scoboria;Kimberley A. Wade;D. Stephen Lindsay;Tanjeem Azad

  • Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness

    Eryn J. Newman;Maryanne Garry;Daniel M. Bernstein;Justin Kantner

  • The Process-Dissociation Procedure and Similarity: Defining and Estimating Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory

    Vincenza Gruppuso;D. Stephen Lindsay;Colleen M. Kelley

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Don Read
J. Don Read University of East London
Maryanne Garry
Maryanne Garry University of Waikato
Marcia K. Johnson
Marcia K. Johnson Yale University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Michael E. J. Masson
Michael E. J. Masson University of Victoria
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Daniel M. Bernstein
Daniel M. Bernstein Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Roger A. Dixon
Roger A. Dixon University of Alberta
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career options and flexible study opportunities. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer high-quality online programs tailored to different needs and locations.

Factors to consider when choosing an online psychology bachelor's program include curriculum focus, faculty expertise, support services for online students, and accreditation status. Regional offerings, such as the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Cincinnati and best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania, can help you compare top-rated regional schools.

State-wide options are also plentiful. For example, check out online psychology bachelor's programs in Illinois and online psychology bachelor's programs in New York to see how each state supports distance learning and professional development in psychology.

Earning a psychology degree online can pave the way for roles such as counselor, human resources specialist, or case manager. Graduates may also choose to specialize further with advanced degrees or certifications, depending on their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing D. Stephen Lindsay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles