World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
11679
World Ranking
3728
National Ranking
398

Amina Memon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amina Memon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amina Memon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amina Memon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amina Memon is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a notable presence in clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and general health professions.

Their recent scholarly contributions include publications in several peer-reviewed journals. Key articles feature titles such as:

  • Culture, trauma, and memory in investigative interviews (2023, Psychology Crime and Law)
  • White paper on forensic child interviewing: research-based recommendations by the European Association of Psychology and Law (2024, Psychology Crime and Law)
  • Secondary traumatization in criminal justice professions: a literature review (2022, Psychology Crime and Law)
  • What have we learned about cues to deception? A survey of expert opinions (2023, Psychology Crime and Law)
  • Vulnerability to interrogative suggestibility from negative life events. A comparison of separated asylum-seeking youth and age-matched peers. (2021, Personality and Individual Differences)

The recurring themes across their research are deception detection and forensic psychology, child abuse and trauma, memory processes and influences, migration, health and trauma, interpreting and communication in healthcare, posttraumatic stress disorder research, and resilience and mental health.

Several frequent co-authors have contributed to their work, including Zoe Given-Wilson, Pekka Santtila, Julia Korkman, Henry Otgaar, and Linda Geven.

Their publications have appeared regularly in venues such as Psychology Crime and Law and Applied Cognitive Psychology, with additional contributions to Personality and Individual Differences, Medicine Science and the Law, and the European Journal of Public Health.

Amina Memon's research supports interdisciplinary dialogue bridging psychological insights with forensic and clinical applications. Their work encompasses both theoretical and applied aspects, addressing issues related to trauma, memory, communication, and the psychological challenges within justice and healthcare systems.

Best Publications

  • The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years.

    Amina Memon;Christian A. Meissner;Joanne Fraser

  • Eyewitness Evidence Improving Its Probative Value

    Gary L. Wells;Amina Memon;Steven D. Penrod

  • On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts.

    Saul M. Kassin;V. Anne Tubb;Harmon M. Hosch;Amina Memon

  • Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event?

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Kevin Allan

  • The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis

    Günter Köhnken;Rebecca Milne;Amina Memon;Ray Bull

  • Psychotherapy and the Recovery of Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse: U.S. and British Practitioners' Opinions, Practices, and Experiences

    Debra A. Poole;D. Stephen Lindsay;Amina Memon;Ray Bull

  • Say it to my face: examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Kevin Allan;Daniel B. Wright

  • Imagination Can Create False Autobiographical Memories

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Amina Memon

  • Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence

    Amina Memon;Lorraine Hope;Ray Bull

  • The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation

    Carole Hill;Amina Memon;Peter McGeorge

  • Isolating the effects of the Cognitive Interview techniques

    Amina Memon;Linsey Wark;Ray Bull;Guenter Koehnken

  • Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion.

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Daniel B. Wright

  • When Eyewitnesses Talk

    Daniel B. Wright;Amina Memon;Elin M. Skagerberg;Fiona Gabbert

  • Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.

    Jean H. Searcy;James C. Bartlett;Amina Memon

  • The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications

    Amina Memon;Ray Bull

  • Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility

    Kevin Colwell;Cheryl K. Hiscock;Amina Memon

  • The Effects of Repeated Questioning on Young Children's Eyewitness Testimony

    Amina Memon;Rita Vartoukian

  • Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview

    Amina Memon;Angela Holley;Rebecca Milne;Guenter Koehnken

  • Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility

    Amina Memon;Aldert Vrij;Ray Bull

  • I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Daniel B. Wright

  • Handbook of the psychology of interviewing

    Amina Memon;Ray Bull

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby
Tim Valentine
Tim Valentine Goldsmiths University of London
James C. Bartlett
James C. Bartlett The University of Texas at Dallas
Laura Crane
Laura Crane University of Birmingham
Lorraine Hope
Lorraine Hope University of Portsmouth
Rebecca Milne
Rebecca Milne University of Portsmouth
D. Stephen Lindsay
D. Stephen Lindsay University of Victoria
Christian A. Meissner
Christian A. Meissner Iowa State University
Ola Svenson
Ola Svenson Stockholm University
Giuliana Mazzoni
Giuliana Mazzoni Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online study options and career pathways, particularly in the area of therapy and counseling. Many students consider the possibility of online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility while covering the foundational knowledge and skills critical for clinical roles.

If you’re interested in a therapy career, each state or city has unique requirements for licensure. For example, check out the educational and licensing steps involved in becoming a licensed therapist in Newark or understand the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Norfolk. In the western U.S., you can review the specific North Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements or learn more about the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Oakland.

When choosing your online degree or planning your psychology career, research local licensure requirements and ensure your program is properly accredited. This preparation is essential for a successful future in therapy or counseling across different U.S. regions.

Best Scientists Citing Amina Memon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles