World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 48 6161 5984 2766 2666 151 9785

Özlem Uzuner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Özlem Uzuner between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Özlem Uzuner published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 21 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Özlem Uzuner: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 3
2005 6
2006 6
2007 3
2008 6
2009 4
2010 8
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 4
2015 14
2016 4
2017 11
2018 8
2019 8
2020 16
2021 22
2022 11
2023 15
2024 10
2025 11
Total 191
Download as CSV

Özlem Uzuner publications per year - data summary

  • Özlem Uzuner, a Computer Science scholar from George Mason University, has 191 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1999, 2001 and 2002, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 27 years in the span carries no publications at all (2000).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.3 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 69 publications, 36% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 25 publications (2.8 per year); 2008-2016: 54 publications (6.0 per year); 2017-2025: 112 publications (12.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Özlem Uzuner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Özlem Uzuner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 151
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Özlem Uzuner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Özlem Uzuner, a Computer Science scholar from George Mason University, records 151 publications - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Özlem Uzuner, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Özlem Uzuner ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Özlem Uzuner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Özlem Uzuner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 48
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Özlem Uzuner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Özlem Uzuner, a Computer Science scholar from George Mason University, records 48 D-Index - the 58th percentile of the discipline.
  • 58% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Özlem Uzuner, and about 42% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Özlem Uzuner ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Özlem Uzuner is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research is primarily focused on the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems.

Their work encompasses a range of topics, with notable emphasis on:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

They have published extensively in prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
  • JMIR Medical Informatics

Their recent papers show a diversity of collaborative and topical focus. Some selected recent publications are:

  • An Empirical Study of Machine learning Algorithms for Social Media Bot Detection (2021), 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS)
  • A Survey of Offensive Language Detection for the Arabic Language (2021), ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
  • The 2019 n2c2/OHNLP Track on Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity: Overview (2020), JMIR Medical Informatics
  • The 2019 n2c2/UMass Lowell shared task on clinical concept normalization (2020), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Large language models for biomedicine: foundations, opportunities, challenges, and best practices (2024), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Özlem Uzuner collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Meliha Yetişgen
  • Kevin Lybarger
  • Nicholas J Dobbins
  • Giridhar Kaushik Ramachandran
  • Fatemah Husain

Best Publications

  • 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text.

    Özlem Uzuner;Brett R South;Shuying Shen;Scott L DuVall

  • Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Automatic De-identification

    Özlem Uzuner;Yuan Luo;Peter Szolovits

  • Extracting medication information from clinical text

    Özlem Uzuner;Imre Solti;Eithon Cadag

  • Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge.

    Weiyi Sun;Anna Rumshisky;Ozlem Uzuner

  • Identifying Patient Smoking Status from Medical Discharge Records

    Özlem Uzuner;Özlem Uzuner;Ira Goldstein;Yuan Luo;Isaac S. Kohane

  • De-identification of patient notes with recurrent neural networks.

    Franck Dernoncourt;Ji Young Lee;Ozlem Uzuner;Peter Szolovits

  • Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: the role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions

    Wendy Webber Chapman;Prakash M. Nadkarni;Lynette Hirschman;Leonard W. D'Avolio;Leonard W. D'Avolio

  • Automated systems for the de-identification of longitudinal clinical narratives

    Amber Stubbs;Christopher Kotfila;Özlem Uzuner

  • 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records.

    Sam Henry;Kevin Buchan;Michele Filannino;Michele Filannino;Amber Stubbs

  • Viewpoint Paper: Recognizing Obesity and Comorbidities in Sparse Data

    Unknown

  • Annotating longitudinal clinical narratives for de-identification

    Amber Stubbs;Özlem Uzuner

  • Sentiment Analysis of Suicide Notes: A Shared Task.

    John P. Pestian;Pawel Matykiewicz;Michelle Linn-Gust;Brett R South

  • Evaluating the state of the art in coreference resolution for electronic medical records.

    Ozlem Uzuner;Andreea Bodnari;Shuying Shen;Tyler Forbush

  • Identifying risk factors for heart disease over time

    Amber Stubbs;Christopher Kotfila;Hua Xu;Özlem Uzuner

  • CLPsych 2019 Shared Task: Predicting the Degree of Suicide Risk in Reddit Posts

    Ayah Zirikly;Philip Resnik;Özlem Uzuner;Kristy Hollingshead

  • Community annotation experiment for ground truth generation for the i2b2 medication challenge.

    Özlem Uzuner;Imre Solti;Fei Xia;Eithon Cadag

  • Can Linguistic Predictors Detect Fraudulent Financial Filings

    Sunita Goel;Jagdish Gangolly;Sue R. Faerman;Ozlem Uzuner

  • A de-identifier for medical discharge summaries

    Özlem Uzuner;Tawanda C. Sibanda;Yuan Luo;Peter Szolovits

  • De-identification of psychiatric intake records: Overview of 2016 CEGS N-GRID shared tasks Track 1.

    Amber Stubbs;Michele Filannino;Özlem Uzuner

  • Machine Learning and Rule-based Approaches to Assertion Classification

    Özlem Uzuner;Özlem Uzuner;Özlem Uzuner;Xiaoran Zhang;Tawanda C. Sibanda

  • Methodological Review: Annotating temporal information in clinical narratives

    Weiyi Sun;Anna Rumshisky;Ozlem Uzuner

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna Rumshisky
Anna Rumshisky University of Massachusetts Lowell
Hua Xu
Hua Xu Yale University
Franck Dernoncourt
Franck Dernoncourt Adobe Systems (United States)
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
Pierre Zweigenbaum
Pierre Zweigenbaum University of Paris-Saclay
Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students look into specialized programs to broaden their skills or transition into fields like data analysis, accounting, or project management.

When considering your options, cost is a key factor. For those interested in law and public safety, a cheap criminal justice degree offers an affordable way to build foundational knowledge and enter the workforce quickly. Alternatively, those aiming for business roles should compare the cost of accounting degree programs to find budget-friendly options with solid job prospects.

Professionals drawn to tech-forward roles can benefit from the best data science master's programs online, which provide in-demand analytical and programming expertise. Additionally, those interested in managing complex projects may consider a construction management degree online for a fast-tracked route into leadership roles in the construction industry.

Each pathway offers flexibility, affordability, and the potential for rewarding careers—making them excellent complements or alternatives to a Computer Science degree.

Best Scientists Citing Özlem Uzuner

Trending Scientists