World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9197
World Ranking
6188
National Ranking
2775

Sanda M. Harabagiu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanda M. Harabagiu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 181 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sanda M. Harabagiu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanda M. Harabagiu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sanda M. Harabagiu is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with a focus on computer science and social sciences. This interdisciplinary approach is reflected in their extensive publication record and collaboration network.

The main fields of study for Harabagiu include:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader fields, their work touches on several subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Harabagiu's research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Relevance Modeling for Microblog Summarization," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Misinformation Adoption or Rejection in the Era of COVID-19," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Identifying the Adoption or Rejection of Misinformation Targeting COVID-19 Vaccines in Twitter Discourse," 2022, Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
  • "From Hesitancy Framings to Vaccine Hesitancy Profiles: A Journey of Stance, Ontological Commitments and Moral Foundations," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The impact of learning Unified Medical Language System knowledge embeddings in relation extraction from biomedical texts," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Harabagiu frequently collaborates with other researchers, sharing co-authorship particularly with:

  • Maxwell Weinzierl
  • Suellen Hopfer
  • Andrew Hickl
  • Ramón Maldonado
  • Kalani Kieu-Diem Phillips

The most common publication venues for Harabagiu include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
  • Frontiers in Digital Health

Best Publications

  • Using Predicate-Argument Structures for Information Extraction

    Mihai Surdeanu;Sanda Harabagiu;John Williams;Paul Aarseth

  • Performance issues and error analysis in an open-domain question answering system

    Dan Moldovan;Marius Paşca;Sanda Harabagiu;Mihai Surdeanu

  • FALCON: Boosting Knowledge for Answer Engines

    Sanda M. Harabagiu;Dan I. Moldovan;Marius. Paşca;Rada Mihalcea

  • LASSO: A Tool for Surfing the Answer Net

    Dan I. Moldovan;Sanda M. Harabagiu;Marius. Paşca;Rada Mihalcea

  • High performance question/answering

    Marius A. Pasca;Sandra M. Harabagiu

  • Experiments with open-domain textual Question Answering

    Sanda M. Harabagiu;Marius A. Paşca;Steven J. Maiorano

  • EmpaTweet: Annotating and Detecting Emotions on Twitter

    Kirk Roberts;Michael A. Roach;Joseph Johnson;Josh Guthrie

  • Question answering based on semantic structures

    Srini Narayanan;Sanda Harabagiu

  • Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering

    Sanda Harabagiu;Andrew Hickl

  • The structure and performance of an open-domain question answering system

    Dan Moldovan;Sanda Harabagiu;Marius Pasca;Rada Mihalcea

  • UTD: Classifying Semantic Relations by Combining Lexical and Semantic Resources

    Bryan Rink;Sanda Harabagiu

  • LCC Tools for Question Answering.

    Dan I. Moldovan;Sanda M. Harabagiu;Roxana Girju;Paul Morarescu

  • COGEX: a logic prover for question answering

    Dan Moldovan;Christine Clark;Sanda Harabagiu;Steve Maiorano

  • WordNet 2 - A Morphologically and Semantically Enhanced Resource

    Sanda M. Harabagiu;George A. Miller;Dan I. Moldovan

  • Topic themes for multi-document summarization

    Sanda Harabagiu;Finley Lacatusu

  • Issues, Tasks and Program Structures to Roadmap Research in Question & Answering (Q&A)

    John Burger;Claire Cardie;Vinay Chaudhri;Robert Gaizauskas

  • Automatic extraction of relations between medical concepts in clinical texts

    Bryan Rink;Sanda M. Harabagiu;Kirk Roberts

  • Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution with Rich Linguistic Features

    Cosmin Bejan;Sanda Harabagiu

  • Negation, contrast and contradiction in text processing

    Sanda Harabagiu;Andrew Hickl;Finley Lacatusu

  • The Role of Lexico-Semantic Feedback in Open-Domain Textual Question-Answering

    Sanda Harabagiu;Dan Moldovan;Marius Pasca;Rada Mihalcea

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Moldovan
Dan Moldovan The University of Texas at Dallas
Mihai Surdeanu
Mihai Surdeanu University of Arizona
Alessandro Moschitti
Alessandro Moschitti Amazon (United States)
Richard H. Scheuermann
Richard H. Scheuermann J. Craig Venter Institute
Ronald M Peshock
Ronald M Peshock The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Rada Mihalcea
Rada Mihalcea University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
George A. Miller
George A. Miller Princeton University
Claire Cardie
Claire Cardie Cornell University
Dragomir R. Radev
Dragomir R. Radev Yale University
Robert Gaizauskas
Robert Gaizauskas University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science in the USA connects with many related online degree opportunities and fast-track career paths. Students often consider expanding their expertise into specialized areas like data analysis, machine learning, and engineering. Exploring data science programs can help you tap into one of today’s most in-demand sectors—with some options offering affordability without sacrificing quality.

If you're interested in the hardware side or crave a hybrid skill set, an online electrical engineering degree ranking can guide you to top remote programs recognized for their reputation and value.

For those eager to enhance their résumé quickly, there are a number of easy certifications to get that open doors to higher-paying tech jobs—often without the commitment of a full degree.

Finally, professionals seeking rapid advancement may consider the quickest online masters degree options. Accelerated programs can help you gain specialized skills in less time, so you can move up the career ladder or switch to a new tech field efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Sanda M. Harabagiu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles