World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre Zweigenbaum

Pierre Zweigenbaum

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8942 8690 215 210 257 5962

Pierre Zweigenbaum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Zweigenbaum between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Zweigenbaum published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 12 of the 288 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1968 2025

288 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Zweigenbaum: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 4
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 4
1998 4
1999 3
2000 7
2001 5
2002 8
2003 9
2004 9
2005 9
2006 9
2007 6
2008 8
2009 10
2010 12
2011 14
2012 19
2013 22
2014 9
2015 17
2016 19
2017 9
2018 10
2019 10
2020 10
2021 3
2022 6
2023 10
2024 4
2025 8
Total 288
Download as CSV

Pierre Zweigenbaum publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Zweigenbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 252–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 257 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377 257
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Zweigenbaum D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Zweigenbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pierre Zweigenbaum is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research focuses primarily on computer science, with a strong emphasis on artificial intelligence.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Toxicology

They have contributed to a range of topics, notably:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Pierre Zweigenbaum has published extensively in several venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Journal of Medical Systems
  • BMC Bioinformatics

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials (2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  • CharacterBERT: Reconciling ELMo and BERT for Word-Level Open-Vocabulary Representations From Characters (2020, arXiv [Cornell University])
  • Lessons Learned from the Usability Evaluation of a Simulated Patient Dialogue System (2021, Journal of Medical Systems)
  • C-Norm: a neural approach to few-shot entity normalization (2020, BMC Bioinformatics)
  • Decorate the Examples: A Simple Method of Prompt Design for Biomedical Relation Extraction (2022, arXiv [Cornell University])

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Serge Sharoff
  • Reinhard Rapp
  • Thomas Lavergne
  • Louise Deléger
  • Robert Bossy

In addition to research articles, Pierre Zweigenbaum has contributed to book publications. One such work is titled Building and Using Comparable Corpora for Multilingual Natural Language Processing, published in 2023 by Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Best Publications

  • Frontiers of biomedical text mining: current progress

    Pierre Zweigenbaum;Dina Demner-Fushman;Hong Yu;Kevin Bretonnel Cohen

  • Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges

    Aurélie Névéol;Hercules Dalianis;Sumithra Velupillai;Sumithra Velupillai;Guergana Savova

  • MEANS: A medical question-answering system combining NLP techniques and semantic Web technologies

    Asma Ben Abacha;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Overview of BioNLP Shared Task 2013

    Claire Nédellec;Robert Bossy;Jin-Dong Kim;Jung-Jae Kim

  • Automatic extraction of semantic relations between medical entities: a rule based approach

    Asma Ben Abacha;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Looking for candidate translational equivalents in specialized, comparable corpora

    Yun-Chuang Chiao;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Text mining applications in psychiatry: a systematic literature review.

    Adeline Abbe;Adeline Abbe;Cyril Grouin;Pierre Zweigenbaum;Bruno Falissard;Bruno Falissard

  • MENELAS: an access system for medical records using natural language.

    Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • CharacterBERT: Reconciling ELMo and BERT for Word-Level Open-Vocabulary Representations From Characters

    Hicham El Boukkouri;Olivier Ferret;Thomas Lavergne;Hiroshi Noji

  • Issues in the structuring and acquisition of an ontology for medical language understanding.

    P Zweigenbaum;B Bachimont;J Bouaud;J Charlet

  • Medical Entity Recognition: A Comparaison of Semantic and Statistical Methods

    Asma Ben Abacha;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Towards a medical question-answering system: a feasibility study.

    Pierre Jacquemart;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Identifying bilingual Multi-Word Expressions for Statistical Machine Translation

    Dhouha Bouamor;Nasredine Semmar;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Text mining for pharmacovigilance

    Asma Ben Abacha;Md. Faisal Mahbub Chowdhury;Aikaterini Karanasiou;Yassine Mrabet

  • Proposal for an Extension of Traditional Named Entities: From Guidelines to Evaluation, an Overview

    Cyril Grouin;Sophie Rosset;Pierre Zweigenbaum;Karën Fort

  • Medical question answering: translating medical questions into sparql queries

    Asma Ben Abacha;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Proposal for an Extension of Traditional Named Entitites: from Guidelines to Evaluation, an Overview

    Cyril Grouin;Sophie Rosset;Pierre Zweigenbaum;Karen Fort

  • Mining defining contexts to help structuring differential ontologies

    Véronique Malaisé;Pierre Zweigenbaum;Bruno Bachimont

  • Extracting Lay Paraphrases of Specialized Expressions from Monolingual Comparable Medical Corpora.

    Louise Deléger;Pierre Zweigenbaum

  • Detecting Semantic Relations between Terms in Definitions

    Véronique Malaisé;Pierre Zweigenbaum;Bruno Bachimont

  • Overview of the Second BUCC Shared Task: Spotting Parallel Sentences in Comparable Corpora

    Pierre Zweigenbaum;Serge Sharoff;Reinhard Rapp

Frequent Co-Authors

Anita Burgun
Anita Burgun Université Paris Cité
Marc Cavazza
Marc Cavazza University of Stirling
Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
Loïc Lepiniec
Loïc Lepiniec University of Paris-Saclay
Patrick Ruch
Patrick Ruch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Guergana Savova
Guergana Savova Harvard University
Lawrence Hunter
Lawrence Hunter University of Colorado Denver
Hong Yu
Hong Yu University of Massachusetts Lowell
Pascale Fung
Pascale Fung Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Stefan Schulz
Stefan Schulz Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA connects you with a world of flexible online degrees and career options. When deciding on your educational journey, it helps to consider the best college majors for your interests and the current job market. Many students choose majors that balance earning potential with personal fulfillment.

For those seeking advanced credentials without a lengthy time commitment, pursuing the easiest masters degree to get online can be a smart move. These programs often offer flexible schedules and streamlined curricula. If affordability is a top priority, exploring a cheap doctorate degree online can open doors to advanced roles without overwhelming debt.

Education professionals looking to move into leadership roles may consider edd online programs that offer fast-track options and practical experience. With so many online pathways, you can align your education with both your budget and your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Zweigenbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles