World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
37648
World Ranking
15875
National Ranking
7987

Anthony Gamst publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Gamst sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 239 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Anthony Gamst D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Gamst sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Gamst is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Hepatology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their main research topics include:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Liver Diseases and Immunity

Recent scholarly contributions by Anthony Gamst cover a range of subjects within these domains. Notable papers published in recent years include:

  • In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition (2022), published in Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
  • Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration (2020), published in Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Changes in abdominal adipose tissue depots assessed by MRI correlate with hepatic histologic improvement in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (2022), published in Journal of Hepatology
  • LI-RADS ancillary feature prediction of longitudinal category changes in LR-3 observations: an exploratory study (2020), published in Abdominal Radiology
  • Sex Differences in Longitudinal Tau-PET in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease (2025), published in JAMA Neurology

Anthony Gamst has collaborated frequently with other researchers in their field. Some of their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Tanya Wolfson (11 co-authored papers)
  • Claude B. Sirlin (10 co-authored papers)
  • Kathryn J. Fowler (8 co-authored papers)
  • John C. Morris (6 co-authored papers)
  • Michael S. Middleton (6 co-authored papers)

Their work has been published in multiple scientific venues, with several recurring publication destinations notable for specialization in medical imaging and hepatology. Frequently appearing journals and platforms for their research include:

  • Abdominal Radiology (4 publications)
  • European Radiology (3 publications)
  • Radiology (2 publications)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) (1 publication)
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

    Marilyn S. Albert;Steven T. DeKosky;Dennis Dickson;Bruno Dubois

  • HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study.

    R. K. Heaton;D. B. Clifford;D. R. Franklin;S. P. Woods

  • Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization.

    R. C. Petersen;P. S. Aisen;Laurel A Beckett;M. C. Donohue

  • HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors

    Robert K. Heaton;Donald R. Franklin;Ronald J. Ellis;J. Allen McCutchan

  • Estrogen Replacement Therapy for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    R. A. Mulnard;C. W. Cotman;C. Kawas;C. H. Van Dyck

  • Effects of age on tissues and regions of the cerebrum and cerebellum.

    Terry L. Jernigan;Terry L. Jernigan;Sarah L. Archibald;Christine Fennema-Notestine;Anthony C. Gamst

  • Association of the metabolic syndrome with history of myocardial infarction and stroke in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    John K. Ninomiya;Gilbert L’Italien;Michael H. Criqui;Joanna L. Whyte

  • Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation

    Shu-Hong Zhu;Jessica Y Sun;Erika Bonnevie;Sharon E Cummins

  • Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: a structural MRI study

    Elizabeth R Sowell;Doris A Trauner;Anthony Gamst;Terry L Jernigan

  • Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration.

    Barbara L Brody;Anthony C Gamst;Rebecca A Williams;Amanda R Smith

  • Brain dysmorphology in individuals with severe prenatal alcohol exposure.

    Sarah L Archibald;Chris Fennema-Notestine;Anthony Gamst;Edward P Riley

  • Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans

    Paul S. Aisen;Ronald C. Petersen;Michael C. Donohue;Anthony Gamst

  • Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: MR Imaging of Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction to Assess Hepatic Steatosis

    An Tang;Justin Tan;Mark Sun;Gavin Hamilton

  • Magnetic resonance elastography predicts advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study.

    Rohit Loomba;Tanya Wolfson;Brandon Ang;Jonathan Hooker

  • A multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of melatonin for sleep disturbance in Alzheimer's disease.

    Clifford Singer;Rochelle E. Tractenberg;Jeffrey Kaye;Kim Schafer

  • Neurocognitive Change in the Era of HIV Combination Antiretroviral Therapy: The Longitudinal CHARTER Study

    Robert K. Heaton;Donald R. Franklin;Reena Deutsch;Scott Letendre

  • Subclavian Artery Stenosis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Association With Cardiovascular Diseases

    Ramin Shadman;Michael H. Criqui;Warner P. Bundens;Arnost Fronek

  • Ethnicity and Peripheral Arterial Disease The San Diego Population Study

    Michael H. Criqui;Veronica Vargas;Julie O. Denenberg;Elena Ho

  • Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Diagnostic and Fat-Grading Accuracy of Low-Flip-Angle Multiecho Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging at 1.5 T

    Takeshi Yokoo;Mark Bydder;Gavin Hamilton;Michael S. Middleton

  • Brain dysmorphology in Individuals with Severe Prenatal Alcohol Exposure, Archibald et al., DMCN 43: 148-54, Erratum

    Sarah L Archibald;Chris Fennema-Notestine;Anthony Gamst;Edward P Riley

Frequent Co-Authors

Claude B. Sirlin
Claude B. Sirlin University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey B. Schwimmer
Jeffrey B. Schwimmer University of California, San Diego
Rohit Loomba
Rohit Loomba University of California, San Diego
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego
Michael C. Donohue
Michael C. Donohue University of Southern California
Christine Fennema-Notestine
Christine Fennema-Notestine University of California, San Diego
Igor Grant
Igor Grant University of California, San Diego
Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Ronald J. Ellis
Ronald J. Ellis University of California, San Diego
Paul S. Aisen
Paul S. Aisen University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn’t always mean going to traditional medical school. There are several flexible online degree programs for students who want to enter healthcare or advance their careers. For example, an online dietitian degree can help you qualify for nutrition-based roles in clinical and wellness settings.

For those interested in health administration, pursuing a degree from the cahme accredited online mha programs list ensures high-quality training recognized by employers. Nurses looking to advance can consider an rn to bsn online with no clinicals for additional flexibility while working.

Additionally, those aiming for leadership and advanced clinical practice can accelerate their education with accelerated dnp programs. These online pathways offer diverse entry points into healthcare and can broaden your opportunities beyond traditional medical studies.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Gamst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles