World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Szolovits

Peter Szolovits

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 65 2400 2326 1200 1156 237 26159

Peter Szolovits publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Szolovits between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Szolovits published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2014. 5 of the 283 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2014. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1973 2025

283 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Szolovits: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 2
1993 6
1994 8
1995 1
1996 7
1997 6
1998 5
1999 0
2000 6
2001 8
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 6
2010 1
2011 6
2012 7
2013 12
2014 22
2015 7
2016 12
2017 22
2018 18
2019 21
2020 18
2021 15
2022 6
2023 5
2024 2
2025 3
Total 283
Download as CSV

Peter Szolovits publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Szolovits sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 237
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Szolovits D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Szolovits sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292 65
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)
  • 2005 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1992 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For pioneering the application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

Overview

Peter Szolovits is affiliated with MIT in the United States and works primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Oncology.

Their work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Peter Szolovits include:

  • Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailment, 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Assessing the potential of GPT-4 to perpetuate racial and gender biases in health care: a model evaluation study, 2023, The Lancet Digital Health
  • What Disease Does This Patient Have? A Large-Scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams, 2021, Applied Sciences
  • A multidimensional precision medicine approach identifies an autism subtype characterized by dyslipidemia, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams, 2021, Preprints.org

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Peter Szolovits include:

  • Di Jin
  • Matthew B. A. McDermott
  • Emily Alsentzer
  • Wei-Hung Weng
  • Eric Lehman

Peter Szolovits frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • The Lancet Digital Health

The scientist has received several awards over the years, including:

  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1992 for pioneering the application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2005
  • Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2006

Best Publications

  • MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database

    Alistair E.W. Johnson;Tom J. Pollard;Lu Shen;Li-wei H. Lehman

  • What Is a Knowledge Representation

    Randall Davis;Howard E. Shrobe;Peter Szolovits

  • Knowledge representation

    Unknown

  • Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailment

    Di Jin;Zhijing Jin;Joey Tianyi Zhou;Peter Szolovits

  • Position paper: The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine

    Vimla L. Patel;Edward H. Shortliffe;Mario Stefanelli;Peter Szolovits

  • Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis

    Peter Szolovits;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems.

    Trishan Panch;Peter Szolovits;Rifat Atun

  • Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Automatic De-identification

    Özlem Uzuner;Yuan Luo;Peter Szolovits

  • Automated de-identification of free-text medical records

    Ishna Neamatullah;Margaret M Douglass;Li-wei H Lehman;Andrew Tomas Reisner

  • What Disease Does This Patient Have? A Large-Scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams

    Di Jin;Eileen Pan;Nassim Oufattole;Wei-Hung Weng

  • Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private.

    Kenneth D Mandl;Peter Szolovits;Isaac S Kohane

  • Implementing electronic medical record systems in developing countries.

    Hamish S F Fraser;Paul Biondich;Deshen Moodley;Sharon Choi

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • De-identification of patient notes with recurrent neural networks.

    Franck Dernoncourt;Ji Young Lee;Ozlem Uzuner;Peter Szolovits

  • Electronic Medical Records for Discovery Research in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Katherine P. Liao;Tianxi Cai;Vivian Gainer;Sergey Goryachev

  • Causal understanding of patient illness in medical diagnosis

    Ramesh S. Patil;Peter Szolovits;William B. Schwartz

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medical Diagnosis

    Peter Szolovits;Ramesh S. Patil;William B. Schwartz

  • Development of phenotype algorithms using electronic medical records and incorporating natural language processing

    Katherine P Liao;Katherine P Liao;Tianxi Cai;Guergana K Savova;Shawn N Murphy

  • Unfolding physiological state: mortality modelling in intensive care units

    Marzyeh Ghassemi;Tristan Naumann;Finale Doshi-Velez;Nicole Brimmer

  • A multivariate timeseries modeling approach to severity of illness assessment and forecasting in ICU with sparse, heterogeneous clinical data

    Marzyeh Ghassemi;Marco A. F. Pimentel;Tristan Naumann;Thomas Brennan

  • Building National Electronic Medical Record Systems via the World Wide Web

    Isaac S. Kohane;Philip Greenspun;James C. Fackler;Christopher Cimino

  • Clinically Accurate Chest X-Ray Report Generation.

    Guanxiong Liu;Tzu-Ming Harry Hsu;Matthew B. A. McDermott;Willie Boag

Frequent Co-Authors

Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University
Elizabeth W. Karlson
Elizabeth W. Karlson Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan Harvard University
Robert M. Plenge
Robert M. Plenge Bristol Myers Squibb
Guergana Savova
Guergana Savova Harvard University
Özlem Uzuner
Özlem Uzuner George Mason University
Franck Dernoncourt
Franck Dernoncourt Adobe Systems (United States)
Kenneth D. Mandl
Kenneth D. Mandl Harvard Medical School
Philip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can significantly broaden your career prospects in the field of Computer Science. Many professionals consider earning an online mba to develop strong business and leadership skills that complement technical expertise.

If you’re seeking to advance your qualifications rapidly, you might want to review the best one year masters programs available online for a streamlined academic experience. These programs are ideal for those who want to upskill without a lengthy time commitment.

Fast-tracking your entry into the workforce is also possible with quick degrees that pay well. Such degrees deliver specialized, in-demand training and open doors to lucrative job roles in tech-driven industries.

Additionally, with artificial intelligence rapidly transforming business and industry, pursuing one of the cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence can help you stay ahead in a competitive job market. Affordable options make advanced study accessible and practical for many students.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Szolovits

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles