World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7133 6649 709 675 107 11140

Tim Valentine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tim Valentine between 1985 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tim Valentine published across 36 years, from 1985 to 2020, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2009. 1 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2009. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1985 2020

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tim Valentine: publications per year, 1985 to 2020
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 4
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 4
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 6
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 6
2006 4
2007 7
2008 3
2009 8
2010 3
2011 1
2012 4
2013 2
2014 4
2015 8
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
Total 110
Download as CSV

Tim Valentine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Valentine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tim Valentine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Valentine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tim Valentine is affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, with primary focus areas in Arts and Humanities, Neuroscience, and Psychology. This interdisciplinary approach informs their work and contributions to related subfields.

Their work is positioned within key subfields such as Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered by Tim Valentine's research include:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity

Collaboration plays a role in their research, with frequent co-authors including Viv Moore and Jarrod Hollis. Viv Moore has co-authored two works alongside Valentine, while Jarrod Hollis has appeared as a co-author on one occasion.

Best Publications

  • A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition:

    Tim Valentine

  • Upside-down faces : a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition

    Tim Valentine

  • Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning☆

    Costanza Papagno;Tim Valentine;Alan Baddeley

  • Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness:

    Tim Valentine;Mitsuo Endo

  • An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition:

    Patrick Chiroro;Tim Valentine

  • The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces

    Tim Valentine;Vicki Bruce

  • The cognitive psychology of proper names

    Serge Bredart;Tim Brennen;Tim Valentine

  • Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces

    Vicki Bruce;Tim Valentine

  • The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition

    Vicki Bruce;Tim Valentine;Alan Baddeley

  • The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

    Tim Valentine;Vicki Bruce

  • Face-space: A unifying concept in face recognition research

    Tim Valentine;Michael Bevan Lewis;Petter J. Hills

  • The cognitive psychology of proper names: On the importance of being Ernest

    Tim Valentine;Tim Brennen;Serge Brédart

  • Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups

    Tim Valentine;Alan Pickering;Stephen Darling

  • Face–space models of face recognition.

    Tim Valentine

  • Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity.

    Valentine T;Bruce

  • Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990)

    V. K. Alogna;M. K. Attaya;P. Aucoin;Š. Bahník

  • Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces

    Tim Valentine;Stephen Darling;Mary Donnelly

  • CCTV on trial: Matching video images with the defendant in the dock

    Josh P. Davis;Tim Valentine

  • Mental rotation of faces

    Tim Valentine;Vicki Bruce

  • The effects of the age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony

    Pamela Coxon;Tim Valentine

Frequent Co-Authors

Serge Brédart
Serge Brédart University of Liège
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Vicki Bruce
Vicki Bruce Newcastle University
Jules Davidoff
Jules Davidoff Goldsmiths University of London
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby
Graham Davies
Graham Davies University of Leicester
Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
Richard Greenwood
Richard Greenwood University College London
Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Andrew J. Calder
Andrew J. Calder University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study opens doors to a range of online degrees and evolving career pathways. Students often consider specializations like counseling, mental health services, or school psychology to enhance their career prospects. With the flexibility of online learning, you can access high-quality programs across the country, no matter your location.

For those interested in geographic hotspots, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in San Francisco offer strong foundations in therapy and psychological assessment. Alternatively, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Stockton are known for their specialized training and community-focused curricula.

Students seeking options in other states may review popular counseling programs in Texas that combine practical skills with flexible study. On a national scale, popular counseling degrees in the US highlight the most accessible and respected online pathways for advancing your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Valentine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles