World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6422
World Ranking
8268
National Ranking
4422

James C. Bartlett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James C. Bartlett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Bartlett is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, with a focus on topics such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, prion diseases and protein misfolding, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, aortic disease and treatment approaches, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

The main fields of study for Bartlett include Medicine, with subfields in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Bartlett are:

  • Recovering high-quality FODs from a reduced number of diffusion-weighted images using a model-driven deep learning architecture, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • MRI-guided histology of TDP-43 knock-in mice implicates parvalbumin interneuron loss, impaired neurogenesis and aberrant neurodevelopment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia, 2021, Brain Communications
  • Understanding aortic valve repair through Ozaki procedure: A review of literature evidence, 2022, Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • MRI-guided histology of TDP-43 knock-in mice implicates parvalbumin interneuron loss, impaired neurogenesis and aberrant neurodevelopment in ALS-FTD, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • 1292 Aortic Valve Neocuspidization Using Glutaraldehyde-Treated Autologous Pericardium: A Literature Review, 2021, British journal of surgery

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Ziqiang Lin
  • Eugene Kim
  • Mohi Ahmed
  • Gang Han
  • Camilla Simmons

Bartlett has published multiple times in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Brain Communications, Journal of Cardiac Surgery, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the British journal of surgery.

Best Publications

  • Inversion and Configuration of Faces.

    James C. Bartlett;Jean Searcy

  • Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces.

    Jean H. Searcy;James C. Bartlett

  • Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective.

    James C. Bartlett;W. Jay Dowling

  • The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies.

    W. Jay Dowling;James C. Bartlett

  • Typicality and familiarity of faces

    James C. Bartlett;Susan Hurry;Warren Thorley

  • Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.

    Jean H. Searcy;James C. Bartlett;Amina Memon

  • 3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of “averages” in attractiveness and age

    Alice J. O'Toole;Theodore J. Price;Thomas Vetter;James C. Bartlett

  • Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces

    James C. Bartlett;Jo E. Leslie

  • False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.

    James C. Bartlett;Laura Strater;Annette Fulton

  • Young and old faces in young and old heads : the factor of age in face recognition

    Annette Fulton;James C. Bartlett

  • Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.

    James C. Bartlett;Annette Fulton

  • The persistence of musical memories: A descriptive study of earworms

    Andrea R. Halpern;James C. Bartlett

  • Aging and memory for pictures of faces.

    James C. Bartlett;Joe E. Leslie;Ann Tubbs;Annette Fulton

  • Recognition of familiar and unfamiliar melodies in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease

    James C. Bartlett;Andrea R. Halpern;W. Jay Dowling

  • Simulating the ‘Other-race Effect* as a Problem in Perceptual Learning

    Alice J. O'toole;Kenneth Deffenbacher;Hervé Abdi;James C. Bartlett

  • Lifespan Memory for Popular Songs

    James C. Bartlett;Paul Snelus

  • Aging and experience in the recognition of musical transpositions

    Andrea R. Halpern;James C Bartlett;Walter J Dowling

  • Affect-Dependent Episodic Memory in Young Children.

    James C. Bartlett;John W. Santrock

  • Emotional mood and memory in young children

    James C. Bartlett;Georgia Burleson;John W. Santrock

  • What Are the Routes to Face Recognition

    James C. Bartlett;Jean H. Searcy;Hervé Abdi

  • PSYCHOMUSICOLOGY Spring 1981 THE IMPORTANCE OF 'INTERVAL INFORMATION IN LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR MELODIES

    W. Jay Dowling;James C. Bartlett

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea R. Halpern
Andrea R. Halpern Bucknell University
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Daniel C. Krawczyk
Daniel C. Krawczyk The University of Texas at Dallas
Hervé Abdi
Hervé Abdi The University of Texas at Dallas
Alice J. O'Toole
Alice J. O'Toole The University of Texas at Dallas
Elizabeth L. Glisky
Elizabeth L. Glisky University of Arizona
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby
Amy E. Pinkham
Amy E. Pinkham The University of Texas at Dallas
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, it’s helpful to explore closely related fields and career options. Social Work is a popular pathway, blending psychological insight with practical skills to support individuals and communities. Many universities offer accredited online degrees in both Psychology and Social Work, increasing flexibility for busy students.

Career opportunities in these fields span healthcare, schools, nonprofits, and private practice. High-quality programs—such as the best social work degrees in Salt Lake City, top social work degrees in San Diego, and best social work degrees in Tacoma—equip graduates for rewarding roles in counseling, advocacy, and case management.

Whether you study online or on campus, earning a degree from one of the top social work programs in USA can open doors to meaningful professional pathways. For those passionate about making a difference, these related degrees offer a strong foundation for impactful, people-focused careers.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Bartlett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles