World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
6679
World Ranking
9081
National Ranking
3257

Philip M. Fine publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Fine sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Philip M. Fine D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Fine sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Fine is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans across multiple fields within environmental and earth sciences, focusing on topics related to air quality and atmospheric processes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader fields, their work delves into several subfields, notably:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science

Philip M. Fine's research topics prominently feature:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Their scholarly contributions include publication in specialized venues such as:

  • Environmental Research Letters

Among recent papers, one representative work is:

  • Responsive high-resolution air quality index mapping using model, regulatory monitor, and sensor data in real-time (2020, Environmental Research Letters)

This publication exemplifies the intersection of environmental monitoring, data integration, and real-time analysis to address air quality assessments.

Philip M. Fine commonly collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Nico Schulte
  • Xiang Li
  • Jo Kay Ghosh
  • Scott A. Epstein

Best Publications

  • Chemical Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from Fireplace Combustion of Woods Grown in the Northeastern United States

    Philip M. Fine;Glen R. Cass;Bernd R. T. Simoneit

  • Open burning of agricultural biomass: Physical and chemical properties of particle-phase emissions

    Michael D. Hays;Philip M. Fine;Christopher D. Geron;Michael J. Kleeman

  • Mobile platform measurements of ultrafine particles and associated pollutant concentrations on freeways and residential streets in Los Angeles

    Dane Westerdahl;Scott Fruin;Todd Sax;Philip M. Fine

  • Chemical Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from the Wood Stove Combustion of Prevalent United States Tree Species

    Philip M. Fine;Glen R. Cass;Bernd R.T. Simoneit

  • Chemical Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from the Fireplace Combustion of Wood Types Grown in the Midwestern and Western United States

    Philip M. Fine;Glen R. Cass;Bernd R. T. Simoneit

  • Measurements and predictors of on-road ultrafine particle concentrations and associated pollutants in Los Angeles

    S. Fruin;S. Fruin;D. Westerdahl;T. Sax;C. Sioutas

  • Measurements of particle number and mass concentrations and size distributions in a tunnel environment.

    Michael D Geller;Satya Brata Sardar;Harish Phuleria;Philip M Fine

  • Diurnal variations of individual organic compound constituents of ultrafine and accumulation mode particulate matter in the Los Angeles Basin.

    Philip M. Fine;Bhabesh Chakrabarti;Meg Krudysz;James J. Schauer

  • Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements

    Bhabesh Chakrabarti;Philip M. Fine;Ralph Delfino;Constantinos Sioutas

  • Air quality impacts of the October 2003 Southern California wildfires

    Harish C. Phuleria;Philip M. Fine;Yifang Zhu;Constantinos Sioutas

  • Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from Burning Church Candles

    Philip M. Fine;Glen R. Cass;Bernd R. T. Simoneit

  • Size-resolved emissions of organic tracers from light- and heavy-duty vehicles measured in a California roadway tunnel.

    Harish C Phuleria;Michael D Geller;Philip M Fine;Constantinos Sioutas

  • Primary Particulate Matter from Ocean-Going Engines in the Southern California Air Basin

    Harshit Agrawal;Rudy Eden;Xinqiu Zhang;Philip M. Fine

  • Roadside measurements of size-segregated particulate organic compounds near gasoline and diesel-dominated freeways in Los Angeles, CA

    Harish C. Phuleria;Rebecca J. Sheesley;James J. Schauer;Philip M. Fine

  • Size distribution of trace organic species emitted from biomass combustion and meat charbroiling

    Michael J. Kleeman;Michael A. Robert;Sarah G. Riddle;Philip M. Fine

  • Seasonal and spatial variability of the size‐resolved chemical composition of particulate matter (PM10) in the Los Angeles Basin

    Satya B. Sardar;Philip M. Fine;Constantinos Sioutas

  • Health effects of subchronic exposure to low levels of wood smoke in rats.

    Yohannes Tesfaigzi;Shashibhushan P. Singh;Jennifer E. Foster;Justin Kubatko

  • Size-Fractionated Measurements of Ambient Ultrafine Particle Chemical Composition in Los Angeles Using the NanoMOUDI

    Satya B Sardar;Philip M Fine;Paul R Mayo;Constantinos Sioutas

  • Organic compounds in biomass smoke from residential wood combustion: Emissions characterization at a continental scale

    Philip M. Fine;Philip M. Fine;Glen R. Cass;Bernd R. T. Simoneit

  • CHARACTERIZATION AND IN VITRO BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATED PARTICULATE MATTER FROM MEXICO CITY

    A. De Vizcaya-Ruiz;M. E. Gutiérrez-Castillo;M. E. Gutiérrez-Castillo;M. Uribe-Ramirez;M. E. Cebrián

  • Intra-community spatial variation of size-fractionated PM mass, OC, EC, and trace elements in the Long Beach, CA area

    Margaret A. Krudysz;John R. Froines;Philip M. Fine;Constantinos Sioutas

Frequent Co-Authors

Constantinos Sioutas
Constantinos Sioutas University of Southern California
James J. Schauer
James J. Schauer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Harish C. Phuleria
Harish C. Phuleria Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Bernd R.T. Simoneit
Bernd R.T. Simoneit Oregon State University
Judith C. Chow
Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute
John G. Watson
John G. Watson Desert Research Institute
Anthony S. Wexler
Anthony S. Wexler University of California, Davis
Yifang Zhu
Yifang Zhu University of California, Los Angeles
Glen R. Cass
Glen R. Cass California Institute of Technology
John R. Froines
John R. Froines University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse careers that benefit from specialized knowledge. Many students complement their studies with related online degrees to broaden their expertise and enhance employability.

For those interested in the earth's physical processes, pursuing the best online geology degree programs offers a solid foundation. These degrees focus on studying the Earth's structure, hazards, and resources, skills highly relevant to environmental science professionals.

Geospatial technologies play an increasingly vital role in environmental management. Students may consider a gis degree, which equips them with tools to analyze spatial data crucial for environmental planning, conservation, and disaster response.

Environmental challenges often require policy solutions. An best online masters in public administration is an excellent choice for individuals aiming to influence public policy, lead sustainability initiatives, and work within governmental or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is essential, making an accredited online bachelors in sociology a valuable asset. This degree enhances comprehension of social behaviors, community dynamics, and environmental justice issues.

Together, these related online degrees provide versatile pathways for students passionate about making a positive environmental impact through science, technology, administration, and social awareness.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Fine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles