World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Portugal
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 81 934 886 5 5 245 20777

Casimiro Pio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Casimiro Pio between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Casimiro Pio published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2007. 1 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2007. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1981 2025

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Casimiro Pio: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 5
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 4
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 3
1999 7
2000 8
2001 14
2002 4
2003 5
2004 2
2005 6
2006 12
2007 26
2008 11
2009 17
2010 19
2011 17
2012 12
2013 17
2014 14
2015 7
2016 8
2017 4
2018 3
2019 1
2020 6
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 253
Download as CSV

Casimiro Pio publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casimiro Pio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 245 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217 245
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Casimiro Pio D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casimiro Pio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38 81
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

Casimiro Pio is affiliated with the University of Aveiro in Portugal and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science, Psychology, and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Clinical Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Applied Psychology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research focuses on several key topics, notably:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Vehicle emissions and performance

Casimiro Pio has published in various peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Atmospheric Research
  • Urban Climate

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Casimiro Pio are:

  • Impact of biomass burning and non-exhaust vehicle emissions on PM10 levels in a mid-size non-industrial western Iberian city, 2022, Atmospheric Environment
  • Vickybot, a Chatbot for Anxiety-Depressive Symptoms and Work-Related Burnout in Primary Care and Health Care Professionals: Development, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness Studies, 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • X-ray Spectroscopic Quantification of Phosphorus Transformation in Saharan Dust during Trans-Atlantic Dust Transport, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Morphological properties, chemical composition, cancer risks and toxicological potential of airborne particles from traffic and urban background sites, 2021, Atmospheric Research
  • Application of SUEWS model forced with WRF: Energy fluxes validation in urban and suburban Portuguese areas, 2020, Urban Climate

Frequent collaborators in research include Oxana Tchepel, Miriam Sanabra, Mireia Primé-Tous, Ivette Morilla, and Iría Grande. These partnerships reflect interdisciplinary cooperation in both environmental and psychological domains.

Best Publications

  • Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres: estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations

    L.M. Castro;C.A. Pio;Roy M. Harrison;D.J.T. Smith

  • Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Mathilde Jammet;Paul C. Stoy;Stephen Estel

  • Levoglucosan levels at background sites in Europe for assessing the impact of biomass combustion on the European aerosol background

    Hans Puxbaum;Alexandre Caseiro;Alexandre Caseiro;Asunción Sánchez-Ochoa;Anne Kasper-Giebl

  • Results of the "Carbon Conference" International Aerosol Carbon Round Robin Test Stage I

    Heidrun Schmid;Lothar Laskus;Hans Jürgen Abraham;Urs Baltensperger

  • Source apportionment of PM2.5 organic aerosol over Europe: Primary/secondary, natural/anthropogenic, and fossil/biogenic origin

    András Gelencsér;Barbara May;David Simpson;David Simpson;Asunción Sánchez-Ochoa

  • OC/EC ratio observations in Europe: Re-thinking the approach for apportionment between primary and secondary organic carbon

    Casimiro Pio;Mário Cerqueira;Roy M. Harrison;Teresa Nunes

  • Partitioning European grassland net ecosystem CO2 exchange into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration using light response function analysis

    T. G. Gilmanov;J. F. Soussana;L. Aires;V. Allard

  • AIRUSE-LIFE+: a harmonized PM speciation and source apportionment in five southern European cities

    Fulvio Amato;Andrés Alastuey;Angeliki Karanasiou;Franco Lucarelli

  • Source apportionment of fine and coarse particulate matter in a sub-urban area at the Western European Coast

    S.M. Almeida;C.A. Pio;M.C. Freitas;M.A. Reis

  • General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) - integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales

    M. Kulmala;A. Asmi;H. K. Lappalainen;H. K. Lappalainen;U. Baltensperger

  • Children exposure to atmospheric particles in indoor of Lisbon primary schools

    Susana Marta Almeida;Nuno Canha;Ana Silva;Maria do Carmo Freitas

  • Chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols during the 2003 summer intense forest fire period

    C.A. Pio;M. Legrand;C.A. Alves;T. Oliveira

  • Net ecosystem carbon exchange in three contrasting Mediterranean ecosystems ? the effect of drought

    J. S. Pereira;J. A. Mateus;L. M. Aires;G. Pita

  • Wood burning impact on PM10 in three Austrian regions

    Alexandre Caseiro;Alexandre Caseiro;Heidi Bauer;Christoph Schmidl;Casimiro A. Pio

  • Climatology of aerosol composition (organic versus inorganic) at nonurban sites on a west-east transect across Europe

    Casimiro Pio;Michel Legrand;Tiago Oliveira;Joana Afonso

  • Size-differentiated composition of inorganic atmospheric aerosols of both marine and polluted continental origin

    Roy M. Harrison;Casimiro A. Pio

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives (nitro-PAHs, oxygenated PAHs, and azaarenes) in PM 2.5 from Southern European cities

    Célia A. Alves;Ana M. Vicente;Danilo Custódio;Mário Cerqueira

  • Composition of extractable organic matter of air particles from rural and urban Portuguese areas

    Célia Alves;Casimiro Pio;Armando Duarte

  • Seasonal trends and possible sources of brown carbon based on 2-year aerosol measurements at six sites in Europe

    Hajnalka Lukács;András Gelencsér;Samuel Hammer;Hans Puxbaum

  • Fireplace and woodstove fine particle emissions from combustion of western Mediterranean wood types

    Célia Alves;Cátia Gonçalves;Ana Patrícia Fernandes;Luís Tarelho

  • Modeling carbonaceous aerosol over Europe: Analysis of the CARBOSOL and EMEP EC/OC campaigns

    David Simpson;David Simpson;K. E. Yttri;Z. Klimont;K. Kupiainen

Frequent Co-Authors

Célia Alves
Célia Alves University of Aveiro
Teresa Nunes
Teresa Nunes University of Aveiro
Susana Marta Almeida
Susana Marta Almeida Instituto Superior Técnico
Xavier Querol
Xavier Querol Spanish National Research Council
Michel Legrand
Michel Legrand University of Lille
András Gelencsér
András Gelencsér University of Pannonia
Roy M. Harrison
Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham
Armando C. Duarte
Armando C. Duarte University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads to interdisciplinary interests, including sociology and social work, which address the human impact on the environment. For those seeking a foundational social science background, online sociology bachelor programs offer accessible options that can complement environmental studies.

For advanced professionals aiming to deepen their expertise, there are unique doctoral pathways that bypass traditional hurdles. Particularly noteworthy are 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, designed for those who want a streamlined doctorate experience, facilitating faster career advancement in academic or policy roles related to environmental issues.

Educators and researchers can also benefit from flexible options like eds to edd programs online, which allow seamless progression from a master's level education degree to a doctoral level without disrupting full-time commitments. These programs are ideal for those focusing on environmental education and advocacy.

Additionally, those interested in the intersection of social work and environmental justice might consider affordable pathways such as the cheapest online dsw programs. These programs prepare graduates for leadership positions tackling social and environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Casimiro Pio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles