World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul Nicholas Pearson

Paul Nicholas Pearson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 68 1123 994 115 101 236 19378

Paul Nicholas Pearson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Nicholas Pearson between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Nicholas Pearson published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2006. 24 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2006. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 16 publications
1989 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Nicholas Pearson: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 6
1993 4
1994 0
1995 11
1996 2
1997 4
1998 5
1999 4
2000 4
2001 8
2002 3
2003 4
2004 2
2005 5
2006 23
2007 12
2008 12
2009 9
2010 2
2011 5
2012 11
2013 6
2014 13
2015 7
2016 10
2017 11
2018 22
2019 8
2020 13
2021 13
2022 10
2023 10
2024 8
2025 16
Total 284
Download as CSV

Paul Nicholas Pearson publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Nicholas Pearson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 236 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262 236
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Nicholas Pearson D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Nicholas Pearson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89 68
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Nicholas Pearson is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to Engineering as well. Their expertise covers several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Ocean Engineering, Paleontology, Oceanography, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's research topics encompass geology and paleoclimatology research, paleontology and stratigraphy of fossils, drilling and well engineering, reservoir engineering and simulation methods, methane hydrates and related phenomena, geological and geophysical studies, and geological formations and processes.

Paul Nicholas Pearson has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • The Miocene: The Future of the Past (2020), published in Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
  • The Eocene-Oligocene transition: a review of marine and terrestrial proxy data, models and model-data comparisons (2021), published in Climate of the Past
  • Proxy evidence for state-dependence of climate sensitivity in the Eocene greenhouse (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • Temperature controls carbon cycling and biological evolution in the ocean twilight zone (2021), published in Science
  • Revisiting the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum "Carbon Cycle Conundrum" With New Estimates of Atmospheric pCO2 From Boron Isotopes (2020), published in Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology

Frequent collaborators of Pearson include:

  • Bridget S. Wade
  • Tom Dunkley Jones
  • Bradley N. Opdyke
  • Isabella Premoli Silvá
  • Isabella Raffi

The common venues for Pearson's publications include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Micropalaeontology
  • Nature Communications
  • Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Martin R. Palmer

  • Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibration to the geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale

    Bridget S. Wade;Paul Nicholas Pearson;William A. Berggren;William A. Berggren;Heiko Pälike

  • Are we now living in the Anthropocene

    Jan Zalasiewicz;Mark Williams;Alan Smith;Tiffany L. Barry

  • Warm tropical sea surface temperatures in the Late Cretaceous and Eocene epochs

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Peter V. Ditchfield;Joyce Singano;Katherine G. Harcourt-Brown

  • A revised tropical to subtropical Paleogene planktonic foraminiferal zonation

    William A. Berggren;William A. Berggren;Paul Nicholas Pearson

  • Atmospheric carbon dioxide through the Eocene–Oligocene climate transition

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Gavin L. Foster;Bridget S. Wade

  • Changing atmospheric CO2 concentration was the primary driver of early Cenozoic climate

    Eleni Anagnostou;Eleanor H. John;Kirsty M. Edgar;Gavin L. Foster

  • Stable warm tropical climate through the Eocene Epoch

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Bart E. van Dongen;Christopher J. Nicholas;Richard D. Pancost

  • The Miocene: The Future of the Past

    M. Steinthorsdottir;M. Steinthorsdottir;H. K. Coxall;A. M. de Boer;M. Huber

  • Cooling and ice growth across the Eocene-Oligocene transition

    Caroline Helen Lear;Trevor R. Bailey;Paul Nicholas Pearson;Helen Kathrine Coxall

  • Very large release of mostly volcanic carbon during the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

    Marcus Gutjahr;Andy Ridgwell;Philip F Sexton;Eleni Anagnostou

  • Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record

    Rampal S. Etienne;Bart Haegeman;Tanja Stadler;Tracy Aze

  • Interplay Between Changing Climate and Species’ Ecology Drives Macroevolutionary Dynamics

    Thomas H. G. Ezard;Thomas H. G. Ezard;Tracy Aze;Paul Nicholas Pearson;Andy Purvis

  • A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera from fossil data.

    Tracy Aze;Thomas H. G. Ezard;Andy Purvis;Helen Kathrine Coxall

  • Microstructural and geochemical perspectives on planktic foraminiferal preservation: “Glassy” versus “Frosty”

    Phillip Francis Sexton;Paul A. Wilson;Paul Nicholas Pearson

  • Atlas of eocene planktonic foraminifera

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Richard K. Olsson;Brian T. Huber;C. Hemleben

  • Early Paleogene temperature history of the Southwest Pacific Ocean: Reconciling proxies and models

    Christopher J. Hollis;Kyle W. R. Taylor;Luke Handley;Richard D. Pancost

  • Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene

    J Zalasiewicz;M Williams;R Fortey;Alan Smith

  • Middle eocene seawater pH and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations

    Paul Nicholas Pearson;Martin R. Palmer

  • Eocene greenhouse climate revealed by coupled clumped isotope-Mg/Ca thermometry

    David M Evans;Navjit Sagoo;Willem Renema;Laura J. Cotton

  • Stable warm tropical climate through the Eocene Epoch: Reply

    PN Pearson;BS Wade

Frequent Co-Authors

Bridget S. Wade
Bridget S. Wade University College London
Helen K. Coxall
Helen K. Coxall Stockholm University
Gavin L. Foster
Gavin L. Foster University of Southampton
William A. Berggren
William A. Berggren Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Brian T. Huber
Brian T. Huber National Museum of Natural History
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Richard K. Olsson
Richard K. Olsson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Richard D. Pancost
Richard D. Pancost University of Bristol
Paul R. Bown
Paul R. Bown University College London
Caroline H. Lear
Caroline H. Lear Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields through online programs. For example, veterans looking for creative outlets may find best military friendly online photography degrees useful for leveraging their unique experiences into new professions.

Language skills can be crucial in global environmental work or research, which is why programs such as military friendly online spanish degree programs offer veterans the chance to specialize in Spanish. These degrees often enhance communication opportunities in diverse communities and increase employability.

For those seeking cost-effective education options, the spanish degrees online provide affordable and flexible pathways to gain valuable language proficiency. This makes them appealing for professionals aiming to add language skills to their Earth Science credentials.

Creative professions related to Earth Science, like environmental design or media, may benefit from the insight offered through mfa online programs. These programs offer specialized training while allowing for flexible schedules, perfect for working students or career changers.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Nicholas Pearson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles