World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 52 2473 2255 427 386 262 8830

Bernd Carsten Stahl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernd Carsten Stahl between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernd Carsten Stahl published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2008. 31 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2008. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 11 publications
2000 2025

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernd Carsten Stahl: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 7
2004 13
2005 10
2006 10
2007 12
2008 30
2009 12
2010 10
2011 12
2012 9
2013 8
2014 11
2015 11
2016 11
2017 11
2018 9
2019 14
2020 16
2021 27
2022 20
2023 16
2024 20
2025 11
Total 317
Download as CSV

Bernd Carsten Stahl publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Carsten Stahl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 254–263 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 262 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162 262
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernd Carsten Stahl D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Carsten Stahl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138 52
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernd Carsten Stahl is affiliated with De Montfort University in the United Kingdom and contributes to the interdisciplinary study of artificial intelligence ethics, social sciences, and neuroscience. Their research prominently addresses the ethical and social implications of emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence.

The scholar's primary fields of study are social sciences and neuroscience, with significant focus on the subfields of cognitive neuroscience, safety research, sociology and political science, health informatics, and artificial intelligence.

The main topics that Bernd Carsten Stahl has explored include:

  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Bernd Carsten Stahl has authored several scholarly papers, including:

  • "The ethics of ChatGPT - Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology" (2023, International Journal of Information Management)
  • "Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications" (2020, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society)

Other notable recent papers in related areas by various authors in the field include:

  • "Opinion Paper: 'So what if ChatGPT wrote it?' Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy" (2023, International Journal of Information Management)
  • "Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: insights from AI policy" (2020, Policy and Society)
  • "Effects of urban living environments on mental health in adults" (2023, Nature Medicine)

The author frequently publishes in several academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Responsible Innovation
  • Nature Mental Health
  • International Journal of Information Management
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Journal of Responsible Technology

Bernd Carsten Stahl has collaborated often with the following coauthors:

  • George Ogoh
  • Damian Eke
  • Rowena Rodrigues
  • Doris Schroeder
  • Nathalie Holz

In addition to articles, Bernd Carsten Stahl has contributed to books published by Springer International Publishing, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future (2021)
  • Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2022)

Best Publications

  • The ethics of ChatGPT - Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology

    Unknown

  • Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;David Wright

  • Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies

    Unknown

  • Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Mark Coeckelbergh;Mark Coeckelbergh

  • Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications

    Mark Ryan;Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Responsible research and innovation in the digital age

    Marina Jirotka;Barbara Grimpe;Bernd Stahl;Grace Eden

  • Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy

    Inga Ulnicane;William Knight;Tonii Leach;Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Michael Obach;Emad Yaghmaei;Emad Yaghmaei;Veikko Ikonen

  • On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen's capability approach?

    Yingqin Zheng;Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • The ethical nature of critical research in information systems

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning

    B.C. Stahl;A. Andreou;P. Brey;T. Hatzakis

  • The Ethics of Computing: A Survey of the Computing-Oriented Literature

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Job Timmermans;Brent Daniel Mittelstadt

  • A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments

    Unknown

  • Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Grace Eden;Marina Jirotka

  • Information security policies in the UK Healthcare Sector: A critical evaluation.

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Neil F. Doherty;Mark Christopher Shaw

  • Information Systems: Critical Perspectives

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Organisational Responses to the Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence.

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Josephina Antoniou;Mark Ryan;Kevin Macnish

  • Ethical Issues of AI

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives

    André Martinuzzi;Vincent Blok;Alexander Brem;Bernd Stahl

  • The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation☆

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Neil McBride;Kutoma Wakunuma;Catherine Flick

  • Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

  • Focus groups and critical social IS research: How the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers.

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Monica Chiarini Tremblay;Cynthia M LeRouge

  • From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Grace Eden;Marina Jirotka;Mark Coeckelbergh

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Brem
Alexander Brem University of Stuttgart
Rob Procter
Rob Procter University of Warwick
Peter Burnap
Peter Burnap Cardiff University
Omer F. Rana
Omer F. Rana Cardiff University
Richard L. Baskerville
Richard L. Baskerville Georgia State University
Gurpreet Dhillon
Gurpreet Dhillon University of Nebraska at Omaha
Jan G. Bjaalie
Jan G. Bjaalie University of Oslo
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Nikolas Rose
Nikolas Rose King's College London
Neil F. Doherty
Neil F. Doherty Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are numerous online degree options tailored to your interests and professional goals. These programs are designed to provide flexibility for working adults and those seeking remote learning opportunities.

Many students are drawn to counseling careers. Those interested in becoming licensed counselors should explore cacrep-accredited counseling programs, which ensure high educational standards and eligibility for professional certification. For those focused on helping families and couples, there are specialized marriage and family masters programs that prepare graduates for impactful, client-focused roles.

Students also frequently pursue online psychology degrees. These programs offer foundational knowledge in human behavior, opening doors to education, business, healthcare, or further graduate study. Similarly, those committed to advocacy and social change often look for the easiest online msw program to begin a career in social work.

With each pathway, online learning can make these rewarding careers more accessible, affordable, and flexible for today's students.

Best Scientists Citing Bernd Carsten Stahl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles