World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2783 2543 112 106 210 9454

Vincent Blok publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vincent Blok between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vincent Blok published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2017. 25 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2017. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 16 publications
2009 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vincent Blok: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 5
2013 16
2014 9
2015 14
2016 16
2017 36
2018 25
2019 23
2020 21
2021 26
2022 22
2023 18
2024 9
2025 16
Total 261
Download as CSV

Vincent Blok publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Blok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 210
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Vincent Blok D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Blok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Vincent Blok is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Social Sciences, with significant contributions in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change, and Strategy and Management.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Vincent Blok has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication sites include the Journal of Responsible Innovation, Philosophy & Technology, Foundations of Science, Techné Research in Philosophy and Technology, and Environmental Values.

Recent published papers include:

  • Improve alignment of research policy and societal values, 2020, Science
  • Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsible research and innovation, 2020, Journal of Responsible Innovation
  • Steering Representations-Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins, 2021, Philosophy & Technology
  • What's wrong with global challenges?, 2021, Journal of Responsible Innovation
  • Reconceptualising responsible research and innovation from a Global South perspective, 2021, Journal of Responsible Innovation

The scientist often collaborates with others, having frequent co-authors such as Eugen Octav Popa, Mark Ryan, Róbert Braun, R. Wesselink, and Edurne A. Iñigo.

Vincent Blok has authored books published by Springer Nature (Netherlands), Open Book Publishers, and Wageningen University & Research. Notable titles include Putting Responsible Research and Innovation into Practice (2022), Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies (2023), and The Critique of Management: Towards a Philosophy and Ethics of Business Management (2021).

Best Publications

  • Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: a survey on the pro-environmental behaviour of university employees

    Vincent Blok;Renate Wesselink;Oldrich Studynka;Ron Kemp

  • Learning apart and together: towards an integrated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education

    Thomas Lans;Vincent Blok;Renate Wesselink

  • Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy

    Thomas B. Long;Vincent Blok;Ingrid Coninx

  • The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation

    Vincent Blok;Pieter Lemmens

  • Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices

    Rob Lubberink;Vincent Blok;Johan van Ophem;Onno Omta

  • Toward a Validated Competence Framework for Sustainable Entrepreneurship

    Lisa Ploum;Vincent Blok;Thomas Lans;Onno Omta

  • Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation

    Renate Wesselink;Vincent Blok;Jarno Ringersma

  • Individual Competencies for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature and Practice Perspective

    E. R. Osagie;R. Wesselink;V. Blok;T. Lans

  • How the characteristics of innovations impact their adoption: An exploration of climate-smart agricultural innovations in South Africa

    Mmapatla Precious Senyolo;Mmapatla Precious Senyolo;Thomas B. Long;Vincent Blok;Onno Omta

  • Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously

    Michael P. Schlaile;Sophie Urmetzer;Vincent Blok;Allan Dahl Andersen

  • Individual competencies for managers engaged in corporate sustainable management practices

    Renate Wesselink;Vincent Blok;Sebastiaan van Leur;Thomas Lans

  • Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices

    V. Blok;L. Hoffmans;E.F.M. Wubben

  • From best practices to bridges for a more sustainable future: advances and challenges in the transition to global sustainable production and consumption: Introduction to the ERSCP stream of the Special volume

    Vincent Blok;Thomas B. Long;A. Idil Gaziulusoy;Nilgun Ciliz

  • Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands

    Thomas B. Long;Arnold Looijen;Vincent Blok

  • Ecological Innovation : Biomimicry as a New Way of Thinking and Acting Ecologically

    Vincent Blok;Bart Gremmen

  • Show me your network and I'll tell you who you are: social competence and social capital of early-stage entrepreneurs

    Thomas Lans;Vincent Blok;Judith Gulikers

  • Look who's talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes

    Vincent Blok

  • Responsible innovation in business: a critical reflection on deliberative engagement as a central governance mechanism

    Teunis Brand;Vincent Blok

  • Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: Lessons from responsible research and innovation

    Edurne A. Inigo;Vincent Blok

  • Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives

    André Martinuzzi;Vincent Blok;Alexander Brem;Bernd Stahl

  • Dealing with the Wicked Problem of Sustainability: The Role of Individual Virtuous Competence

    V. Blok;H.G.J. Gremmen;R. Wesselink

  • Moral “Lock-In” in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives

    M. R. N. Bruijnis;V. Blok;E. N. Stassen;H. G. J. Gremmen

Frequent Co-Authors

Onno Omta
Onno Omta Wageningen University & Research
Thomas Lans
Thomas Lans HAN University of Applied Sciences
Martin Mulder
Martin Mulder Wageningen University & Research
Donald Huisingh
Donald Huisingh University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Carlo Ingrao
Carlo Ingrao University of Bari Aldo Moro
Anastasia Zabaniotou
Anastasia Zabaniotou Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Rodrigo Lozano
Rodrigo Lozano University of A Coruña
Marcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner European Forest Institute
Michael J. Bernstein
Michael J. Bernstein Pennsylvania State University
Jacopo Bacenetti
Jacopo Bacenetti University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse opportunities for both academic advancement and professional growth. With increasing demand for flexibility, online programs are an attractive option for many learners.

For those seeking a quicker path, a masters degree online offers a streamlined approach to advanced study, while an online bachelor's degree helps students earn credentials faster.

Career-oriented students in social work may consider affordable msw programs online, which prepare graduates for frontline roles in communities and organizations. Similarly, those interested in behavioral analysis will find specialized training through bcba programs—a valuable credential for those passionate about serving individuals with developmental or behavioral needs.

Each of these pathways can lead to meaningful careers while offering the flexibility and affordability students need. Online degrees continue to expand access to quality education in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent Blok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles