World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1588 252 150 7453

Neil F. Doherty publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil F. Doherty between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil F. Doherty published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 1 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1975 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil F. Doherty: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 6
1996 6
1997 2
1998 8
1999 7
2000 3
2001 3
2002 6
2003 8
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 15
2009 5
2010 7
2011 13
2012 9
2013 10
2014 12
2015 9
2016 8
2017 2
2018 3
2019 1
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Neil F. Doherty publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil F. Doherty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 150 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85 150
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil F. Doherty D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil F. Doherty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil F. Doherty is affiliated with Loughborough University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences, with a focus on occupational health, employment studies, and education.

The main fields of study associated with Neil F. Doherty include social sciences, with specific subfields such as sociology and political science, radiological and ultrasound technology, general health professions, communication, and education.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, encompassing occupational health and safety research, employment and welfare studies, workplace violence and bullying, international student and expatriate challenges, higher education and employability, human resource and talent management, as well as cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Recent published papers by Neil F. Doherty are as follows:

  • Safety risk factors in two different types of routine outsourced work: a systematic literature review, 2020, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
  • Self-initiated expatriation and older women: composing a further life, 2021, Personnel Review
  • Medical and Physician Assistant Student Competence in Basic Life Support: Opportunities to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training, 2021, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Integrative Objects in Sociotechnical Contexts: Constructing Digital Well-Being with Generic Epistemology, 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

Neil F. Doherty has contributed to venues including:

  • Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
  • Personnel Review
  • Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Colin Pilbeam
  • David Denyer
  • Barbara Myers
  • Kaye Thorn
  • Rohit Gupta

Best Publications

  • Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model

    Colin Ashurst;Neil F Doherty;Joe Peppard

  • Why do they go? Individual and corporate perspectives on the factors influencing the decision to accept an international assignment

    Michael Dickmann;Noeleen Doherty;Timothy Mills;Chris Brewster

  • Internet retailing: the past, the present and the future

    Neil F. Doherty;Fiona Ellis‐Chadwick

  • Operational research from Taylorism to Terabytes: A research agenda for the analytics age

    Michael J. Mortenson;Neil F. Doherty;Stewart Robinson

  • Retailer adoption of the Internet – Implications for retail marketing

    Cathy Hart;Neil Doherty;Fiona Ellis‐Chadwick

  • Exploring the motives of company-backed and self-initiated expatriates

    Unknown

  • Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies

    Neil F Doherty;Colin Ashurst;Joe Peppard

  • Aligning the information security policy with the strategic information systems plan

    Neil F. Doherty;Heather Fulford

  • Cyber retailing in the UK: the potential of the internet as a retail channel

    Neil Doherty;Fiona Ellis-Chadwick;Cathryn A. Hart

  • Web advertising: The role of e-mail marketing

    Fiona Ellis-Chadwick;Neil F. Doherty

  • The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems planning: an empirical analysis

    Neil F. Doherty;Chris Marples;A. Suhaimi

  • A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical

    Neil F Doherty;Crispin R Coombs;John Loan-Clarke

  • From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects

    Neil F. Doherty;Molcolm King

  • Do Information Security Policies Reduce the Incidence of Security Breaches: An Exploratory Analysis

    Neil F. Doherty;Heather Fulford

  • The information security policy unpacked: A critical study of the content of university policies

    Neil Francis Doherty;Leonidas Anastasakis;Heather Fulford

  • The Meanings of Career Revisited: Implications for Theory and Practice

    Unknown

  • An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects

    N. F. Doherty;M. King

  • Safety leadership practices for organizational safety compliance: developing a research agenda from a review of the literature

    Colin Pilbeam;Noeleen Doherty;Ross Davidson;David Denyer

  • The role of IS capabilities in delivering sustainable improvements to competitive positioning

    Neil F. Doherty;Mark Terry

  • The application of information security policies in large UK‐based organizations: an exploratory investigation

    Heather Fulford;Neil F. Doherty

  • An analysis of the anticipated cultural impacts of the implementation of data warehouses

    N.F. Doherty;G. Doig

  • Information security policies in the UK Healthcare Sector: A critical evaluation.

    Bernd Carsten Stahl;Neil F. Doherty;Mark Christopher Shaw

  • Understanding the Self-initiated Expatriate: A Review and Directions for Future Research

    Unknown

  • The impact of inadequacies in the treatment of organizational issues on information systems development projects

    Neil F. Doherty;Malcolm King;Omar Al-Mushayt

  • An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet in the UK retail sector

    Neil Doherty;Fiona Ellis-Chadwick;Cathy Hart

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Carsten Stahl
Bernd Carsten Stahl De Montfort University
Stewart Robinson
Stewart Robinson Loughborough University
Joe Peppard
Joe Peppard University College Dublin
Helge Janicke
Helge Janicke Edith Cowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens doors to many flexible learning opportunities and career tracks. Today, online education makes it easier to specialize while balancing work or family commitments. For those interested in the booming construction industry, a construction management online degree can provide practical skills to lead projects and teams efficiently.

Many professionals also consider advanced credentials such as executive mba online programs to accelerate their leadership growth. These online MBAs are designed for working managers seeking to take on higher roles without pausing their careers.

If affordability is a priority, a variety of cheap online master's programs are now available across business disciplines, enabling access to recognized qualifications at a lower cost.

Data-driven decision-making is also critical in modern business management. Pursuing an online masters in data science can help you gain expertise in analytics and technology, boosting your employability in nearly every sector.

Best Scientists Citing Neil F. Doherty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles