World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
10067
World Ranking
9552
National Ranking
591

Stewart Robinson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart Robinson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stewart Robinson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart Robinson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stewart Robinson is affiliated with Loughborough University in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated at the intersection of decision sciences and economics, with a strong emphasis on management science, operations research, and econometrics.

Their work covers a range of topics including health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, simulation techniques and applications, business process modeling and analysis, schizophrenia research and treatment, complex systems and decision making, mental health treatment and access, as well as transportation planning and optimization.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robinson include Huajie Jin, Sarah Byford, Paul Tappenden, James H. MacCabe, and Evanthia Achilla. These collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach to research spanning economics, health services, and operational modeling.

Robinson has published research in several academic venues, with the highest number of contributions appearing in the Journal of Simulation and the Journal of the Operational Research Society. Other notable venues include PLoS ONE, PharmacoEconomics, and Health Economics.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Robinson are:

  • Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions, 2023, Health Economics
  • Exploring the relationship between simulation model accuracy and complexity, 2022, Journal of the Operational Research Society
  • Healthcare workers' perspectives on participatory system dynamics modelling and simulation: designing safe and efficient hospital pharmacy dispensing systems together, 2020, Ergonomics
  • Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Services for Schizophrenia in the UK Across the Entire Care Pathway in a Single Whole-Disease Model, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Can we learn from simplified simulation models? An experimental study on user learning, 2020, Journal of Simulation

Best Publications

  • Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use

    Stewart Robinson

  • Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements

    Stewart Robinson

  • The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context

    Antuela A. Tako;Stewart Robinson

  • Measuring service quality: current thinking and future requirements

    Stewart Robinson

  • Simulation Maidel Verification And Validation: Increasing The Users' Confidence

    Stewart Robinson

  • SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare

    Stewart Robinson;Zoe Jane Radnor;Nicola Burgess;Claire Worthington

  • Discrete-event simulation : from the pioneers to the present, what next?

    Stewart Robinson

  • Operational research from Taylorism to Terabytes: A research agenda for the analytics age

    Michael J. Mortenson;Neil F. Doherty;Stewart Robinson

  • Conceptual modelling for simulation Part II: a framework for conceptual modelling

    Stewart Robinson

  • Successful Simulation: A Practical Approach to Simulation Projects

    Stewart Robinson

  • Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles

    Stewart Robinson;Richard E. Nance;Ray J. Paul;Michael Pidd

  • Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines

    Thomas Monks;Christine S. M. Currie;Bhakti Stephan Onggo;Stewart Robinson

  • Conceptual modeling for simulation: issues and research requirements

    Stewart Robinson

  • Conceptual Modeling for Discrete-Event Simulation

    Stewart Robinson;Roger Brooks;Kathy Kotiadis;Durk-Jouke Van Der Zee

  • Business process modelling and analysis using discrete-event simulation

    Vlatka Hlupic;Stewart Robinson

  • Provider and customer expectations of successful simulation projects

    Stewart Robinson;Michael Pidd

  • Conceptual modelling: knowledge acquisition and model abstraction

    Kathy Kotiadis;Stewart Robinson

  • Model development in discrete-event simulation and system dynamics: An empirical study of expert modellers

    Antuela A. Tako;Stewart Robinson

  • Soft with a hard centre: discrete-event simulation in facilitation

    Stewart Robinson

  • Comparing discrete-event simulation and system dynamics: users' perceptions

    Antuela A. Tako;Stewart Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Edwards
John S. Edwards Aston University
Zoe Radnor
Zoe Radnor Aston University
Paul Tappenden
Paul Tappenden University of Sheffield
James H. MacCabe
James H. MacCabe King's College London
Tracy Hall
Tracy Hall Lancaster University
Martin Kunc
Martin Kunc University of Southampton
Peter J. Haas
Peter J. Haas University of Massachusetts Amherst
Sheldon H. Jacobson
Sheldon H. Jacobson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lee W. Schruben
Lee W. Schruben University of California, Berkeley
Shane G. Henderson
Shane G. Henderson Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to flexible learning options and diverse career opportunities. For those looking to earn a degree in less time, 2 year online degrees are becoming increasingly popular. These programs require less commitment than traditional four-year degrees but still equip students with essential technical skills.

Many students seek affordable and efficient ways to earn credentials. Choosing cheap online degrees fast can significantly reduce costs and time to graduation. This can be especially attractive for adults balancing work and study or for high school graduates seeking quicker entry into the workforce.

Not all online colleges have strict admissions criteria. There are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, making higher education more accessible to a wider range of learners. This opens up pathways for those who may have faced academic challenges in the past yet are determined to pursue a degree.

Considering career paths, Computer Science graduates have a broad range of options, similar to those who wonder what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. From software engineering to data analysis, online degrees can be the launchpad for rewarding tech careers in various industries.

Best Scientists Citing Stewart Robinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles