World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
12635
World Ranking
5272
National Ranking
2429

Peter J. Haas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Haas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter J. Haas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Haas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
  • 2013 - ACM Fellow For leadership in probabilistic methods for the management and analysis of data and for system simulation.

Overview

Peter J. Haas is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably Data Management and Algorithms, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, High-Energy Particle Collisions Research, Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Simulation Techniques and Applications, and Data Stream Mining Techniques.

Peter J. Haas has authored multiple papers in prominent academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany" (2022) published in BMC Health Services Research
  • "Enhanced Simulation Metamodeling via Graph and Generative Neural Networks" (2022) presented at the 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • "NIM: Generative Neural Networks for Automated Modeling and Generation of Simulation Inputs" (2023) featured in ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
  • "Evaluating Psychosocial Support Provided by an Augmented Reality Device for Children With Type 1 Diabetes" (2021) presented at the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care
  • "Planning for Implementation Success of an Electronic Cross-Facility Health Record for Pediatric Palliative Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)" (2022) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent coauthors working with Peter J. Haas include Alexandra Meliou, Azza Abouzied, Matteo Brucato, J. Friedrich, and S. Gerassimov, reflecting collaboration across multiple research projects.

The scientist's frequent publication venues further illustrate their research breadth, with multiple papers appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, BMC Health Services Research, and the 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

Peter J. Haas has been recognized within the scientific community through awards such as the ACM Fellow title awarded in 2013 for leadership in probabilistic methods for the management and analysis of data and for system simulation. In 2016, they were also named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS).

Best Publications

  • Online aggregation

    Joseph M. Hellerstein;Peter J. Haas;Helen J. Wang

  • Improved histograms for selectivity estimation of range predicates

    Viswanath Poosala;Peter J. Haas;Yannis E. Ioannidis;Eugene J. Shekita

  • Large-scale matrix factorization with distributed stochastic gradient descent

    Rainer Gemulla;Erik Nijkamp;Peter J. Haas;Yannis Sismanis

  • Synopses for Massive Data: Samples, Histograms, Wavelets, Sketches

    Graham Cormode;Minos Garofalakis;Peter J. Haas;Chris Jermaine

  • Ripple joins for online aggregation

    Peter J. Haas;Joseph M. Hellerstein

  • Stochastic Petri Nets: Modelling, Stability, Simulation

    Peter J. Haas

  • CORDS: automatic discovery of correlations and soft functional dependencies

    Ihab F. Ilyas;Volker Markl;Peter Haas;Paul Brown

  • Sampling-Based Estimation of the Number of Distinct Values of an Attribute

    Peter J. Haas;Jeffrey F. Naughton;S. Seshadri;Lynne Stokes

  • The New Jersey Data Reduction Report.

    Daniel Barbará;William DuMouchel;Christos Faloutsos;Peter J. Haas

  • MCDB: a monte carlo approach to managing uncertain data

    Ravi Jampani;Fei Xu;Mingxi Wu;Luis Leopoldo Perez

  • Watermarking relational data: framework, algorithms and analysis

    Rakesh Agrawal;Peter J. Haas;Jerry Kiernan

  • Ricardo: integrating R and Hadoop

    Sudipto Das;Yannis Sismanis;Kevin S. Beyer;Rainer Gemulla

  • Interactive data analysis: the Control project

    J.M. Hellerstein;R. Avnur;A. Chou;C. Hidber

  • Sequential sampling procedures for query size estimation

    Peter J. Haas;Arun N. Swami

  • On synopses for distinct-value estimation under multiset operations

    Kevin Beyer;Peter J. Haas;Berthold Reinwald;Yannis Sismanis

  • Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature

    Scott Spangler;Angela D. Wilkins;Benjamin J. Bachman;Meena Nagarajan

  • Selectivity and Cost Estimation for Joins Based on Random Sampling

    Peter J. Haas;Jeffrey F. Naughton;S. Seshadri;Arun N. Swami

  • A new two-phase sampling based algorithm for discovering association rules

    Bin Chen;Peter Haas;Peter Scheuermann

  • Large-sample and deterministic confidence intervals for online aggregation

    P.J. Haas

  • GORDIAN: efficient and scalable discovery of composite keys

    Yannis Sismanis;Paul Brown;Peter J. Haas;Berthold Reinwald

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker Markl
Volker Markl Technical University of Berlin
Rainer Gemulla
Rainer Gemulla University of Mannheim
Berthold Reinwald
Berthold Reinwald IBM (United States)
Guy M. Lohman
Guy M. Lohman IBM (United States)
Joseph M. Hellerstein
Joseph M. Hellerstein University of California, Berkeley
Wang-Chiew Tan
Wang-Chiew Tan Facebook (United States)
Paul P. Maglio
Paul P. Maglio University of California, Merced
Peter W. Glynn
Peter W. Glynn Stanford University
Nimrod Megiddo
Nimrod Megiddo IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens a gateway to diverse online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students begin with foundational programming or analytics before branching into specialized areas. For those interested in analytics, consider following a data science learning path to acquire in-demand skills in big data and artificial intelligence.

Engineering continues to be a popular option, and there are many online electrical engineering courses USA offers that combine theoretical learning with real-world applications. These programs can be completed entirely online, making them accessible for working professionals.

Certifications are another quick way to boost your resume and earning potential. There’s a growing list of certifications for jobs that require less time and investment compared to a full degree, yet can open doors to well-paying roles in IT and tech support.

Finally, if you want to advance quickly, consider enrolling in one of the shortest master degree programs. These accelerated options allow you to gain advanced expertise and credentials in about a year, helping you move forward in your career faster.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Haas

Trending Scientists