World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
20787
World Ranking
16296
National Ranking
8193

Blake Cady publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blake Cady sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Blake Cady D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blake Cady sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Blake Cady is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific subfields including Oncology and Cancer Research. The main topics explored in their work are Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies.

They have published research in several notable venues, including:

  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Psychology

Among their recent papers are:

  • "57% decline in Rhode Island invasive breast cancer mortality between 1987 and 2017: mammography predominates in preventing mortality," published in 2020 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • "Acknowledgment," published in 2020 in Health Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Blake Cady include:

  • John P Fulton
  • Rachel V. Aaron
  • Emma K. Adam
  • Marieke Adriaanse
  • Amanda Adrian

Best Publications

  • An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

    Cady B;Rossi R

  • Initial results from a prospective cohort study of 5583 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the United States during 1996: An American college of surgeons commission on cancer patient care evaluation study

    Scott A. Hundahl;Blake Cady;Myles P. Cunningham;Ernest Mazzaferri

  • Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome.

    Blake Cady;Roger Jenkins;Glenn Steele;W. Lewis

  • Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases. A multi-institutional study of long-term survivors.

    Kevin S. Hughes;Rebecca B. Rosenstein;Sate Songhorabodi;Martin A. Adson

  • Edema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage I-II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy.

    David Larson;Mark Weinstein;Itzhak Goldberg;Barbara Silver

  • The Cell Cycle Inhibitor p27 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Small (T1a,b) Invasive Breast Carcinomas

    Puay Tan;Blake Cady;Molly Wanner;Peter Worland

  • The New Era in Breast Cancer: Invasion, Size, and Nodal Involvement Dramatically Decreasing as a Result of Mammographic Screening

    Blake Cady;Michael D. Stone;John G. Schuler;Ravi Thakur

  • Changing clinical, pathologic, therapeutic, and survival patterns in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

    Blake Cady;Cornelius E. Sedgwick;William A. Meissner;John R. Bookwalter

  • Conservative Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: Long-term Cosmetic Results

    Mary Ann Rose;Ivo Olivotto;Blake Cady;Clinton Koufman

  • Risk factor analysis in differentiated thyroid cancer

    Blake Cady;Cornelius E. Sedgwick;William A. Meissner;Marvin S. Wool

  • Technical and biological factors in disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

    Blake Cady;Michael D. Stone;William V. McDermott;Roger L. Jenkins

  • Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure.

    Ivo A. Olivotto;Mary Ann Rose;Robert T. Osteen;Susan Love

  • A 5-year study of cryosurgery in the treatment of liver tumors.

    T. S. Ravikumar;Robert Kane;Blake Cady;Roger Jenkins

  • Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer.

    Blake Cady;William V. McDERMOTT

  • Differentiated thyroid cancer: reexamination of risk groups and outcome of treatment.

    Laura E. Sanders;Blake Cady

  • Early breast cancer: predictors of breast recurrence for patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy☆

    John Boyages;Abram Recht;James L. Connolly;Stuart J. Schnitt

  • Lymph node metastases. Indicators, but not governors of survival

    Blake Cady

  • Preliminary results of a phase I/II study of HDR brachytherapy alone for T1/T2 breast cancer

    David E. Wazer;David E. Wazer;Lisa Berle;Roger Graham;Maureen Chung

  • Role of the Cdc25A phosphatase in human breast cancer.

    M. Giulia Cangi;Barry Cukor;Peggy Soung;Sabina Signoretti

  • Current results of conservative surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

    Ricardo L. Rossi;Ricardo L. Rossi;Ricardo L. Rossi;Blake Cady;Blake Cady;Blake Cady;Mark L. Silverman;Mark L. Silverman;Mark L. Silverman;Marvin S. Wool;Marvin S. Wool;Marvin S. Wool

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn Steele
Glenn Steele Geisinger Health System
Jay R. Harris
Jay R. Harris Brigham and Women's Hospital
Abram Recht
Abram Recht Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Daniel B. Kopans
Daniel B. Kopans Harvard University
Stuart J. Schnitt
Stuart J. Schnitt Brigham and Women's Hospital
James L. Connolly
James L. Connolly Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lawrence J. Solin
Lawrence J. Solin University of Pennsylvania
Barbara L. Smith
Barbara L. Smith Harvard University
Rebecca Gelman
Rebecca Gelman Harvard University
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA goes beyond traditional degrees—there are many alternative and online pathways to start or further your healthcare career. For registered nurses seeking advancement, comparing rn to bsn online cost options is important, as affordability can significantly impact your educational decisions.

Individuals with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree can transition into advanced nursing roles by looking into non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs. These accelerated degrees are designed to streamline entry into the nursing profession, making it easier for career changers.

If you're concerned about admission requirements, some easiest nursing programs to get into offer more flexible entry criteria without compromising educational quality. This makes the nursing path more accessible, especially for adult learners or those with non-traditional backgrounds.

Healthcare roles outside direct patient care, such as medical billing and coding, are also in demand. Many aspiring professionals seek out medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa to help finance their education. These online programs offer flexibility and open up opportunities in the healthcare industry beyond clinical positions.

Best Scientists Citing Blake Cady

Trending Scientists