World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank A. Vicini

Frank A. Vicini

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
38330
World Ranking
6580
National Ranking
3493

Frank A. Vicini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank A. Vicini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 766 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank A. Vicini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank A. Vicini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank A. Vicini is affiliated with Beaumont Health in the United States. Their research is principally focused on oncology, particularly breast cancer treatment and radiotherapy approaches.

The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. More specialized subfields in which they have contributed are Cancer Research, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Radiation.

Their research covers major topics such as Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Breast Lesions and Carcinomas, Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy, Lymphatic System and Diseases, and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Cancer Research
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Brachytherapy

Coauthors they collaborate with regularly are:

  • Chirag Shah
  • Troy Bremer
  • Pat W. Whitworth
  • Steven C. Shivers
  • Lori J. Pierce

Some recent publications featuring Frank A. Vicini as an author or contributor include:

  • NRG RTOG 1005: A Phase III Trial of Hypo Fractionated Whole Breast Irradiation with Concurrent Boost vs. Conventional Whole Breast Irradiation Plus Sequential Boost Following Lumpectomy for High Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2022, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Abstract GS02-07: Loco-Regional Irradiation in Patients with Biopsy-proven Axillary Node Involvement at Presentation Who Become Pathologically Node-negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Primary Outcomes of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304, 2024, Cancer Research
  • Novel radiation therapy approaches for breast cancer treatment, 2020, Seminars in Oncology
  • The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT® on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery, 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Prognostic Risk Assessment and Prediction of Radiotherapy Benefit for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast, in a Randomized Clinical Trial (SweDCIS), 2021, Cancers

Best Publications

  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

    Benjamin D. Smith;Benjamin D. Smith;Douglas W. Arthur;Thomas A. Buchholz;Bruce G. Haffty

  • Adaptive radiation therapy

    Di Yan;Frank Vicini;John Wong;Alvaro Martinez

  • Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.

    Asa J. Nixon;Donna Neuberg;Daniel F. Hayes;Rebecca Gelman

  • Long-term radiation complications following conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with early stage breast cancer

    Susan M Pierce;Abram Recht;Tatiana I Lingos;Anthony Abner

  • Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy

    Tatiana I. Lingos;Abram Recht;Frank Vicini;Anthony Abner

  • Initial clinical experience with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator in women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.

    Martin Keisch;Frank Vicini;Robert R Kuske;Mary Hebert

  • Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation.

    Vincent M Remouchamps;Frank A Vicini;Michael B Sharpe;Larry L Kestin

  • Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy☆

    Editha A Krueger;Edwin G Wilkins;Myla Strawderman;Paul Cederna

  • Fractionation for Whole Breast Irradiation: An American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Evidence-Based Guideline

    Benjamin D. Smith;Soren M. Bentzen;Candace R. Correa;Carol A. Hahn

  • Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI).

    Michel J. Ghilezan;David A. Jaffray;Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen;Marcel Van Herk

  • Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.

    Larry L Kestin;Michael B Sharpe;Robert C Frazier;Frank A Vicini

  • Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

    Frank A Vicini;Michael Sharpe;Larry Kestin;Alvaro Martinez

  • Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial

    Frank A Vicini;Reena S Cecchini;Julia R White;Douglas W Arthur

  • Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer: A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation

    Inga S Grills;Di Yan;Alvaro A Martinez;Frank A Vicini

  • Limited-Field Radiation Therapy in the Management of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Frank A. Vicini;Larry Kestin;Peter Chen;Pamela Benitez

  • Variability of Target and Normal Structure Delineation for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: An RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study

    X. Allen Li;An Tai;Douglas W. Arthur;Thomas A. Buchholz

  • Regional nodal failure after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

    A Recht;S M Pierce;A Abner;F Vicini

  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation using 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT)

    Kathy L Baglan;Michael B Sharpe;David Jaffray;Robert C Frazier

  • Five-year results: the initial clinical trial of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer.

    Pamela R. Benitez;Martin E. Keisch;Frank Vicini;Alan Stolier

  • Initial clinical experience with moderate deep-inspiration breath hold using an active breathing control device in the treatment of patients with left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy.

    Vincent M. Remouchamps;Nicola Letts;Frank A. Vicini;Michael B. Sharpe

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Martinez
Alvaro Martinez Beaumont Health
Larry L. Kestin
Larry L. Kestin Beaumont Health
Di Yan
Di Yan Beaumont Health
Bruce G. Haffty
Bruce G. Haffty Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John Wong
John Wong Johns Hopkins University
Henry Mark Kuerer
Henry Mark Kuerer The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Lori J. Pierce
Lori J. Pierce University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abram Recht
Abram Recht Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David A. Jaffray
David A. Jaffray The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jay R. Harris
Jay R. Harris Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in the healthcare field but not ready to commit to a full medical degree have several alternative online pathways to consider. For example, if you already hold a bachelor’s degree in another field, you may be eligible for direct entry msn online programs that fast-track your journey into nursing and advanced practice roles.

Those who are looking for more accessible options may want to explore easy nursing programs to get into, which often have simplified admissions requirements compared to traditional medical schools. Similarly, if you are concerned about entrance exams, you might consider institutions listed as do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school, as many of these programs waive standardized test requirements.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, exploring programs that offer financial aid for medical billing and coding can be a smart and flexible career move. These online options provide practical skills and credentials for roles that are in high demand within the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Frank A. Vicini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles