World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Larry L. Kestin

Larry L. Kestin

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
18120
World Ranking
18188
National Ranking
9065

Larry L. Kestin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry L. Kestin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 363 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Larry L. Kestin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry L. Kestin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Larry L. Kestin is affiliated with Beaumont Health in the United States and has a substantial body of research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work is extensively focused on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, with significant contributions also in radiation, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, otorhinolaryngology, and oncology. Their research encompasses both clinical and therapeutic aspects with a particular emphasis on lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Larry L. Kestin has contributed to numerous publications and collaborated frequently with several coauthors. Notable frequent collaborators include M.M. Matuszak, James A. Hayman, M.M. Dominello, Benjamin Movsas, and Shruti Jolly.

Their recent published papers include:

  • American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic or Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Predictors of Pneumonitis After Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria: Radiation Therapy for Limited-Stage SCLC 2020, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria on Radiation Therapy for Extensive-Stage SCLC, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Chemoradiation with Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Proton Collaborative Group Phase 2 Trial, 2022, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

The primary venues where their research has been published include:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Practical Radiation Oncology
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Cureus
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology

Best Publications

  • Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Peter T. Scardino;Michael W. Kattan;Thomas M. Pisansky

  • Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation.

    Vincent M Remouchamps;Frank A Vicini;Michael B Sharpe;Larry L Kestin

  • Outcomes after stereotactic lung radiotherapy or wedge resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

    Inga S. Grills;Victor S. Mangona;Robert Welsh;Gary Chmielewski

  • Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.

    Larry L Kestin;Michael B Sharpe;Robert C Frazier;Frank A Vicini

  • Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

    Frank A Vicini;Michael Sharpe;Larry Kestin;Alvaro Martinez

  • Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer: A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation

    Inga S Grills;Di Yan;Alvaro A Martinez;Frank A Vicini

  • Defining A radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography

    Quinten C. Black;Inga S. Grills;Larry L. Kestin;Ching Yee O. Wong

  • Limited-Field Radiation Therapy in the Management of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Frank A. Vicini;Larry Kestin;Peter Chen;Pamela Benitez

  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation using 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT)

    Kathy L Baglan;Michael B Sharpe;David Jaffray;Robert C Frazier

  • Initial clinical experience with moderate deep-inspiration breath hold using an active breathing control device in the treatment of patients with left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy.

    Vincent M. Remouchamps;Nicola Letts;Frank A. Vicini;Michael B. Sharpe

  • Accelerated Treatment of Breast Cancer

    Frank A. Vicini;Kathy L. Baglan;Larry L. Kestin;Chris Mitchell

  • Ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy to deliver partial-breast irradiation in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy

    Frank A Vicini;Vincent Remouchamps;Michelle Wallace;Michael Sharpe

  • Image-Guided Radiotherapy via Daily Online Cone-Beam CT Substantially Reduces Margin Requirements for Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy

    Inga S. Grills;Geoffrey Hugo;Larry L. Kestin;Ana Paula Galerani

  • THE USE OF HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE AFTER LUMPECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER TREATED WITH BREAST-CONSERVING THERAPY

    Kathy L Baglan;Alvaro A Martinez;Robert C Frazier;Vijay R Kini

  • Dose-volume analysis of predictors for chronic rectal toxicity after treatment of prostate cancer with adaptive image-guided radiotherapy.

    Carlos Vargas;Alvaro Martinez;Larry L. Kestin;Di Yan

  • A Collaborative Analysis of Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy Outcomes for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Daily Online Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy

    Inga Siiner Grills;Andrew J. Hope;Matthias Guckenberger;Larry L. Kestin

  • Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy.

    Asif Harsolia;Larry Kestin;Inga Grills;Michelle Wallace

  • Long-term cosmetic results and toxicity after accelerated partial-breast irradiation: a method of radiation delivery by interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma.

    Peter Y. Chen;Frank A. Vicini;Pamela Benitez;Larry L. Kestin

  • Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy.

    Frank A. Vicini;Larry L. Kestin;Neal S. Goldstein;Peter Y. Chen

  • Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation.

    Di Yan;David Lockman;Alvaro Martinez;John Wong

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank A. Vicini
Frank A. Vicini Beaumont Health
Alvaro Martinez
Alvaro Martinez Beaumont Health
Di Yan
Di Yan Beaumont Health
John Wong
John Wong Johns Hopkins University
Howard M. Sandler
Howard M. Sandler Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Benjamin Movsas
Benjamin Movsas Henry Ford Health System
Matthias Guckenberger
Matthias Guckenberger University of Zurich
Deborah A. Kuban
Deborah A. Kuban The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alan Pollack
Alan Pollack University of Miami
David A. Jaffray
David A. Jaffray The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding healthcare careers and flexible educational options. Prospective students can consider paths that fit their individual needs and timelines. For those seeking accessible routes into nursing, adn nursing programs provide a direct entry point, often requiring less time than traditional bachelor's degrees.

Additionally, administrative roles in healthcare are growing rapidly. Students interested in combining healthcare with office skills can pursue medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid, making this career path more accessible financially and logistically.

If standardized test requirements are a hurdle, some programs offer flexibility. For example, you can find a nursing school that don't require teas, helping students focus on their studies without the added pressure of entrance exams.

Leadership-minded individuals may explore online health administration programs, designed for those wanting to manage or innovate within healthcare organizations. These online programs make it easier to balance work, study, and personal life while advancing toward a fulfilling healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Larry L. Kestin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles