World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18064 16977 9001 8319 283 21641

Glenn Steele publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Glenn Steele between 1974 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Glenn Steele published across 43 years, from 1974 to 2016, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 1993. 3 of the 285 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 1993. 1974: 6 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 21 publications 1990: 17 publications 1991: 20 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 31 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication
1974 2016

285 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Glenn Steele: publications per year, 1974 to 2016
Year Publications
1974 6
1975 7
1976 0
1977 0
1978 5
1979 5
1980 11
1981 12
1982 6
1983 8
1984 13
1985 2
1986 10
1987 9
1988 5
1989 21
1990 17
1991 20
1992 16
1993 31
1994 16
1995 19
1996 6
1997 4
1998 4
1999 2
2000 4
2001 0
2002 2
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 0
2010 3
2011 2
2012 5
2013 1
2014 3
2015 2
2016 1
Total 285
Download as CSV

Glenn Steele publications per year - data summary

  • Glenn Steele, a Medicine scholar from Geisinger Health System, has 285 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1974 to 2016.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1974 and the most recent to 2016.
  • The most productive year is 1993, with 31 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2007, 2013 and 2016, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1976, 1977, 2001, 2003 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.9 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2012-2016) hold 12 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1974-1988: 99 publications (6.6 per year); 1989-2003: 162 publications (10.8 per year); 2004-2016: 24 publications (1.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Glenn Steele publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Steele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 283 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 283
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Glenn Steele publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Glenn Steele, a Medicine scholar from Geisinger Health System, records 283 publications - the 13th percentile of the discipline.
  • 13% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Glenn Steele, and about 87% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Glenn Steele ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Glenn Steele D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Steele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Glenn Steele D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Glenn Steele, a Medicine scholar from Geisinger Health System, records 78 D-Index - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Glenn Steele, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Glenn Steele ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Glenn Steele is affiliated with Geisinger Health System in the United States. The available data does not specify particular research papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work.

There is no detailed information regarding the scientist's main or subfields of study, nor about their principal topics of research or the specific areas covered in publications. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been recorded in the provided data.

Based on the information given, Glenn Steele is an active researcher whose contributions are linked to Geisinger Health System, a notable institution in healthcare. Further details about their academic output and collaboration network are not provided.

Best Publications

  • Intracellular heterogeneity in mitochondrial membrane potentials revealed by a J-aggregate-forming lipophilic cation JC-1.

    Stephen T. Smiley;Martin Reers;Cristina Mottola-Hartshorn;Mei Lin

  • Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Biologic perspective.

    Glenn Steele;T. S. Ravikumar

  • A clinical-pharmacological evaluation of hepatic arterial infusions of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and 5-fluorouracil.

    William D. Ensminger;Andre Rosowsky;Vic Raso;David C. Levin

  • Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome.

    Blake Cady;Roger Jenkins;Glenn Steele;W. Lewis

  • Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases. A multi-institutional study of long-term survivors.

    Kevin S. Hughes;Rebecca B. Rosenstein;Sate Songhorabodi;Martin A. Adson

  • A prospective evaluation of hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group Protocol 6584.

    G Steele;R Bleday;R J Mayer;A Lindblad

  • Continuous Innovation In Health Care: Implications Of The Geisinger Experience

    Ronald A. Paulus;Karen Davis;Karen Davis;Glenn D. Steele

  • The DCC Protein and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

    David Shibata;Michael A. Reale;Philip Lavin;Mark Silverman

  • Prospective comparison of preoperative imaging and intraoperative ultrasonography in the detection of liver tumors

    Maureen P. Clarke;Robert A. Kane;Glenn Steele;Edna S. Hamilton

  • The integrin alpha 6 beta 4 is a laminin receptor.

    Edward C. Lee;Margaret M. Lotz;Glenn D. Steele Jr.;Arthur M. Mercurio

  • Technical and biological factors in disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

    Blake Cady;Michael D. Stone;William V. McDermott;Roger L. Jenkins

  • The National Cancer Data Base report on colon cancer

    J. Milburn Jessup;J. Milburn Jessup;Lamar S. McGinnis;Lamar S. McGinnis;Glenn D. Steele;Glenn D. Steele;Herman R. Menck

  • Sphincter-Sparing Treatment for Distal Rectal Adenocarcinoma

    Glenn D. Steele;James E. Herndon;Ron Bleday;Anthony Russell

  • A 5-year study of cryosurgery in the treatment of liver tumors.

    T. S. Ravikumar;Robert Kane;Blake Cady;Roger Jenkins

  • Dequalinium, a topical antimicrobial agent, displays anticarcinoma activity based on selective mitochondrial accumulation

    Michael J. Weiss;James R. Wong;Chul Soo Ha;Ronald Bleday

  • Decreased expression of Mac-2 (carbohydrate binding protein 35) and loss of its nuclear localization are associated with the neoplastic progression of colon carcinoma.

    Margaret M. Lotz;Charles W. Andrews Jr.;Cynthia A. Korzelius;Edward C. Lee

  • Immediate reconstruction of the perineal wound with gracilis muscle flaps following abdominoperineal resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent carcinoma of the rectum.

    David Shibata;William Hyland;Paul Busse;H. Katherine Kim

  • Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection : Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry

    Petar Vukasin;Adrian E. Ortega;Frederick L. Greene;Glenn D. Steele

  • Prospective evaluation of local excision for small rectal cancers.

    Ronald Bleday;Ronald Bleday;Elizabeth Breen;Elizabeth Breen;Milburn J. Jessup;Milburn J. Jessup;Anne Burgess;Anne Burgess

  • Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology

    Glenn Steele

Frequent Co-Authors

Blake Cady
Blake Cady Harvard University
Lan Bo Chen
Lan Bo Chen Harvard University
Robert J. Mayer
Robert J. Mayer Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Arthur M. Mercurio
Arthur M. Mercurio University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
John A. Mannick
John A. Mannick Brigham and Women's Hospital
David P. Winchester
David P. Winchester American College of Surgeons
Herman R. Menck
Herman R. Menck University of Southern California
Jerome P. Richie
Jerome P. Richie Brigham and Women's Hospital
Richard Wilson
Richard Wilson Harvard University
Masaki Mori
Masaki Mori Kyushu University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA offers more than traditional doctor pathways—numerous online degrees and certifications can open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. For example, if you’re interested in medication management, a pharmacy degree online can help you become a licensed pharmacist while offering flexibility in your studies.

If managing healthcare records or data interests you, consider rhit programs online. These programs focus on the growing need for professionals in health information management and electronic health records.

For those who prefer medical administration roles, earning a medical billing and coding certification online can pave the way for work-from-home and flexible office positions in the healthcare sector.

Nurses looking to advance their practice might explore the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs. These programs enable career growth and specialization with the convenience of remote learning.

Exploring these online pathways can help you find your best fit in the growing and diverse field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn Steele

Recently Published Articles