World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
6969
World Ranking
6932
National Ranking
3032

Erik Meijer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Meijer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Erik Meijer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Meijer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik Meijer is affiliated with Facebook in the United States and has an active research portfolio spanning several interconnected fields. Their work predominantly focuses on issues related to health, psychiatry, and artificial intelligence, with notable engagement in sociology and political science. The scientist's research addresses topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment, health disparities and outcomes, frailty in older adults, software engineering research, retirement and employment issues, conducting polymers, and survey methodology.

Their recent publications include significant contributions to the understanding of dementia and health outcomes. Key papers authored or co-authored by Erik Meijer include:

  • "Prevalence of dementia in India: National and state estimates from a nationwide study" (2023), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Tracking the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Lives of American Households" (2020), published in DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • "Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control and their association with healthcare access in the middle-aged and older Indian population: A nationwide cohort study" (2022), published in PLoS Medicine
  • "Economic costs of dementia in 11 countries in Europe: Estimates from nationally representative cohorts of a panel study" (2022), published in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • "Measurement and Structure of Cognition in the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia" (2020), published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent co-authors working alongside Erik Meijer include Jinkook Lee, Alden L. Gross, Haomiao Jin, Stefan Schneider, and Emma Nichols. These collaborations reflect a strong interdisciplinary approach linking epidemiology, geriatrics, and social science.

Erik Meijer's publications appear regularly in several respected venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Polymer Science
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B

In addition to journal articles, Erik Meijer has contributed to book publications under RAND Corporation eBooks, with works documenting longitudinal studies that track health and demographic variables over extended periods:

  • RAND HRS Longitudinal File 2018 (V2) Documentation: Includes 1992-2018 (Final Release) (2022)
  • RAND HRS Longitudinal File 2020 (V1) Documentation: Includes 1992-2020 (Early Release) (2023)

The breadth of Erik Meijer's research encompasses both theoretical and applied dimensions, linking advanced analytical techniques with public health and social issues. This includes software engineering aspects related to survey methodology and health data systems. Their work contributes to multiple domains that intersect health sciences and computational methods.

Best Publications

  • Functional programming with bananas, lenses, envelopes and barbed wire

    Erik Meijer;Maarten M. Fokkinga;Ross Paterson

  • LINQ: reconciling object, relations and XML in the .NET framework

    Erik Meijer;Brian Beckman;Gavin Bierman

  • Domain specific embedded compilers

    Daan Leijen;Erik Meijer

  • Three-dimensional object simulation using audio, visual, and tactile feedback

    Erik Meijer;Umut Alev;Sinan Ussakli

  • Monadic parsing in Haskell

    Graham Hutton;Erik Meijer

  • Shortcut deforestation in calculational form

    Akihiko Takano;Erik Meijer

  • Parsec: direct style monadic parser combinators for the real world

    D. Leijen;E. Meijer

  • Type classes: an exploration of the design space

    Simon Peyton Jones;Mark Jones;Erik Meijer

  • Monadic parser combinators

    Graham Hutton;Erik Meijer

  • Implicit parameters: dynamic scoping with static types

    Jeffrey R. Lewis;John Launchbury;Erik Meijer;Mark B. Shields

  • Bananas in space: extending fold and unfold to exponential types

    Erik Meijer;Graham Hutton

  • Technical Overview of the Common Language Runtime

    Erik Meijer;John Gough

  • The world according to LINQ

    Erik Meijer

  • The essence of data access in Cω : The power is in the dot!

    Gavin Bierman;Erik Meijer;Wolfram Schulte

  • A co-relational model of data for large shared data banks

    Erik Meijer;Gavin Bierman

  • Systems and methods providing lightweight runtime code generation

    Erik Meijer;Dario Russi;Peter F. Drayton

  • Merging Monads and Folds for Functional Programming

    Erik Meijer;Johan Jeuring

  • Calling hell from heaven and heaven from hell

    Sigbjorn Finne;Daan Leijen;Erik Meijer;Simon Peyton Jones

  • The Essence of Data Access in C omega .

    Gavin M. Bierman;Erik Meijer;Wolfram Schulte

  • Lost in translation: formalizing proposed extensions to c#

    Gavin M. Bierman;Erik Meijer;Mads Torgersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Wolfram Schulte
Wolfram Schulte Microsoft (United States)
Simon Jones
Simon Jones Microsoft (United States)
Mark Harman
Mark Harman University College London
Tim Sheard
Tim Sheard Portland State University
Frank Tip
Frank Tip Northeastern University
Nigel B. Perry
Nigel B. Perry University of Otago
Satish Chandra
Satish Chandra Association for Computing Machinery
Guido Boella
Guido Boella University of Turin
Matei Zaharia
Matei Zaharia University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science opens up flexible options for students from diverse backgrounds. Many choose to begin with an associate's degree online, which offers a fast and affordable way to build foundational skills and enter the tech workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for those seeking hands-on experience or a stepping stone to further education.

For those aiming to specialize or advance their careers, earning one of the most useful graduate degrees in computer science can lead to greater job opportunities and higher salaries. Online graduate programs make it easier to balance work and personal commitments while upskilling.

Budget is always a concern, but students have excellent choices among cheap online colleges that deliver quality education at a lower cost. Plus, those concerned about academic qualifications will find online graduate schools with low gpa requirements, further widening the path to a degree in computer science.

With flexible formats and options to fit nearly any situation, online education is making computer science careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Erik Meijer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles