World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
10396
World Ranking
10486
National Ranking
4388

Robert G. Sargent publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert G. Sargent D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Robert G. Sargent is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily Environmental Science and Engineering, with particular focus on Environmental Engineering as a subfield.

Their recent scholarly work includes publications that address cartography and numerical analysis techniques, reflecting interests in Historical Geography and Cartography as well as Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques.

  • Minimum-distortion continuous cartograms by numerically optimized meshes (2024), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Minimum-distortion continuous cartograms by numerically optimized meshes (2025), published in the International Journal of Cartography

Robert G. Sargent has frequently collaborated with co-authors Brett Walters and Chris Wickens. Their publications have appeared most often in arXiv (Cornell University) and the International Journal of Cartography.

  • arXiv (Cornell University): 1 publication
  • International Journal of Cartography: 1 publication

Their research topics cover a broad spectrum of fields and applications. Key areas of work include:

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Optical measurement and interference techniques
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Historical Geography and Cartography

In terms of subfields, Robert G. Sargent has contributed to Environmental Engineering, Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Surgery, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Social Psychology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Surgery
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Among accolades, Robert G. Sargent was recognized as a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • A Methodology for Fitting and Validating Metamodels in Simulation

    Jack P.C. Kleijnen;Robert G. Sargent

  • Validation and verification of simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Unknown

  • A Unifying View of Hybrid Simulation/Analytic Models and Modeling

    J. G. Shanthikumar;R. G. Sargent

  • Verification, validation and accreditation of simulation models

    R.G. Sargent

  • Verification and Validation of Simulation Models

    Unknown

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Unknown

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation

    Richard E. Nance;Robert G. Sargent

  • A methodology for cost-risk analysis in the statistical validation of simulation models

    Osman Balci;Robert G. Sargent

  • Some approaches and paradigms for verifying and validating simulation models

    R.G. Sargent

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Unknown

  • Verifying and validating simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Validation and Verification of Simulation Models

    Unknown

  • Validation of Simulation Models via Simultaneous Confidence Intervals

    Osman Balci;Robert G. Sargent

  • Validation of simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Unknown

  • Analysis of future event set algorithms for discrete event simulation

    William M. McCormack;Robert G. Sargent

  • An investigation of finite-sample behavior of confidence interval estimators

    Robert G. Sargent;Keebom Kang;David Goldsman

  • A tutorial on verification and validation of simulation models (1984)

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Simulation model verification and validation

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Simulation Model Validation

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Some examples of simulation model validation using hypothesis testing

    Osman Balci;Robert G. Sargent

  • Some subjective validation methods using graphical displays of data

    Robert G. Sargent

  • Verification and validation of simulation models

    Unknown

  • A modification of the process interaction world view

    Bruce A. Cota;Robert G. Sargent

  • A tutorial on validation and verification of simulation models

    Robert G. Sargent

  • A Formal Development of Event Graphs as an Aid to Structured and Efficient Simulation Programs

    Tapas K. Som;Robert G. Sargent

Frequent Co-Authors

Osman Balci
Osman Balci Virginia Tech
David Goldsman
David Goldsman Georgia Institute of Technology
Jack P. C. Kleijnen
Jack P. C. Kleijnen Tilburg University
Christopher D. Wickens
Christopher D. Wickens Colorado State University
Bernard P. Zeigler
Bernard P. Zeigler University of Arizona
Lee W. Schruben
Lee W. Schruben University of California, Berkeley
Stewart Robinson
Stewart Robinson Loughborough University
Paul A. Fishwick
Paul A. Fishwick The University of Texas at Dallas
Russell R. Barton
Russell R. Barton Pennsylvania State University
Sally C. Brailsford
Sally C. Brailsford University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science online opens the door to exciting and flexible learning opportunities across closely related STEM fields. Many students opt for an accelerated cs degree to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These intensive programs are perfect for motivated learners looking to advance quickly.

Affordability is another key concern for prospective students. For those interested in sustainability, searching for the cheapest online environmental science degree can help manage education costs while gaining skills relevant to environmental careers. Similarly, if your passion is machinery and innovation, comparing mechanical engineering degree online cost options is essential to find quality programs within your budget.

For students drawn to the fundamentals of science, an online physics degree provides another flexible pathway. Graduates from these online STEM degrees can pursue careers in technology, research, and engineering, as well as advanced graduate study. Choosing the right degree helps you align your studies with your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert G. Sargent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles