World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
87
Citations
26085
World Ranking
737
National Ranking
389

Michael J. Carey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Carey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 310 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael J. Carey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Carey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to the design, implementation, and evaluation of database systems.
  • 2000 - ACM Fellow For broad and influential contributions to the engineering of database management systems.

Overview

Michael J. Carey is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems and Management.

The main topics of Michael J. Carey's work include:

  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Carey illustrate their research interests and publication activity. These include:

  • SmartBench, published in 2020 in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Robust and efficient memory management in Apache AsterixDB, published in 2020 in Software Practice and Experience
  • Breaking down memory walls, published in 2020 in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • JEDI: These aren't the JSON documents you're looking for..., published in 2022 in the Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data
  • PolyFrame, published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael J. Carey include:

  • Vassilis J. Tsotras
  • Chen Luo
  • Wail Y. Alkowaileet
  • Phanwadee Sinthong
  • Xikui Wang

Publication venues where Carey has commonly contributed are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Software Practice and Experience
  • Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data
  • 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)

Michael J. Carey has received several professional recognitions including membership in the National Academy of Engineering awarded in 2002 for contributions to the design, implementation, and evaluation of database systems. Additionally, the ACM Fellow distinction was awarded in 2000 for broad and influential contributions to the engineering of database management systems.

Best Publications

  • XMark: a benchmark for XML data management

    Albrecht Schmidt;Florian Waas;Martin Kersten;Michael J. Carey

  • The 007 Benchmark

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Jeffrey F. Naughton

  • The HiPAC project: combining active databases and timing constraints

    U. Dayal;B. Blaustein;A. Buchmann;U. Chakravarthy

  • Efficient parallel set-similarity joins using MapReduce

    Rares Vernica;Michael J. Carey;Chen Li

  • Shoring up persistent applications

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Michael J. Franklin;Nancy E. Hall

  • Towards heterogeneous multimedia information systems: the Garlic approach

    M.J. Carey;L.M. Haas;P.M. Schwarz;M. Arya

  • Concurrency control performance modeling: alternatives and implications

    Rakesh Agrawal;Michael J. Carey;Miron Livny

  • A Study of Index Structures for Main Memory Database Management Systems

    Tobin J. Lehman;Michael J. Carey

  • Efficiently Publishing Relational Data as XML Documents

    Jayavel Shanmugasundaram;Eugene J. Shekita;Rimon Barr;Michael J. Carey

  • Object and File Management in the EXODUS Extensible Database System

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Joel E. Richardson;Eugene J. Shekita

  • A data model and query language for EXODUS

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Scott L. Vandenberg

  • The Architecture of the EXODUS Extensible DBMS.

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Daniel Frank;Goetz Graefe

  • Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies

    Alon Y. Halevy;Naveen Ashish;Dina Bitton;Michael Carey

  • The oo7 Benchmark.

    Michael J. Carey;David J. DeWitt;Jeffrey F. Naughton

  • Hyracks: A flexible and extensible foundation for data-intensive computing

    Vinayak Borkar;Michael Carey;Raman Grover;Nicola Onose

  • On saying “Enough already!” in SQL

    Michael J. Carey;Donald Kossmann

  • The XML benchmark project

    A. R. Schmidt;Florian Waas;Martin L. Kersten;D. Florescu

  • Data caching tradeoffs in client-server DBMS architectures

    Michael J. Carey;Michael J. Franklin;Miron Livny;Eugene J. Shekita

  • Starburst mid-flight: as the dust clears (database project)

    L.M. Haas;W. Chang;G.M. Lohman;J. McPherson

  • A Benchmark for XML Data Management

    A.R. Schmidt;F. Waas;M.L. Kersten;M.J. Carey

  • Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2010

    Feifei Li;Mirella M. Moro;Shahram Ghandeharizadeh;Jayant R. Haritsa

  • Concurrency control performance modeling: alternatives and implications

    Rakesh Agrawal;Michael J. Carey;Miron Livny

Frequent Co-Authors

Miron Livny
Miron Livny University of Wisconsin–Madison
David J. DeWitt
David J. DeWitt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Chen Li
Chen Li University of California, Irvine
Michael J. Franklin
Michael J. Franklin University of Chicago
Laura M. Haas
Laura M. Haas University of Massachusetts Amherst
Vassilis J. Tsotras
Vassilis J. Tsotras University of California, Riverside
Jeffrey F. Naughton
Jeffrey F. Naughton University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eugene J. Shekita
Eugene J. Shekita Google (United States)
Donald Kossmann
Donald Kossmann Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens a variety of online education and career options. If you’re interested in quick ways to boost your credentials, consider easy certifications to get in tech fields. These can enhance your resume and may lead to high-paying opportunities without a long-term commitment.

For those wanting a deeper specialization, fast-tracking your education is possible through the shortest masters degree programs available online. These programs let you earn an advanced degree in less time, making it easier to balance work and study.

Deciding which degree is most valuable? Many look for the best masters degree to get in today's job market. In-demand programs often focus on data science, cybersecurity, and AI, connecting graduates to future-ready career paths.

Additionally, associates degrees online offer an affordable and flexible entry point into computer science. These degrees are perfect for those starting out or looking to pivot into tech from another industry.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles