World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 50 5056 4844 1854 1713 128 8049

Edwin P. Gerber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edwin P. Gerber between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edwin P. Gerber published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2020. 9 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edwin P. Gerber: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 8
2011 1
2012 7
2013 9
2014 9
2015 9
2016 11
2017 9
2018 5
2019 9
2020 17
2021 15
2022 8
2023 15
2024 13
2025 7
2026 2
Total 169
Download as CSV

Edwin P. Gerber publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin P. Gerber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 128
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Edwin P. Gerber D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin P. Gerber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263 50
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Edwin P. Gerber is affiliated with the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with particular focus on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses topics such as climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, and geophysics and gravity measurements.

The scientific output of Edwin P. Gerber is documented in multiple publication venues. Frequent journals include:

  • Journal of Climate
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Edwin P. Gerber include:

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Tropical teleconnection impacts on Antarctic climate changes, 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Uncertainty in the Response of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupling to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations in CMIP6 Models, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • The Building Blocks of Northern Hemisphere Wintertime Stationary Waves, 2020, Journal of Climate
  • The Generic Nature of the Tropospheric Response to Sudden Stratospheric Warmings, 2020, Journal of Climate

Edwin P. Gerber frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including:

  • Chaim I. Garfinkel
  • Martin Jucker
  • Ian White
  • Justin Finkel
  • Dorian S. Abbot

Best Publications

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

    Mark P. Baldwin;Blanca Ayarzagüena;Thomas Birner;Thomas Birner;Neal Butchart

  • Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

    S.-W. Son.;E. P. Gerber;J. Perlwitz;J. Perlwitz;L. M. Polvani

  • On the Lack of Stratospheric Dynamical Variability in Low‐Top Versions of the CMIP5 Models

    Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;Mark P. Baldwin;Thomas Birner;Robert X. Black

  • Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems

    Masatomo Fujiwara;Jonathon S. Wright;Gloria L. Manney;Lesley J. Gray

  • Impacts of the north and tropical Atlantic Ocean on the Antarctic Peninsula and sea ice

    Xichen Li;David M. Holland;Edwin P. Gerber;Changhyun Yoo

  • Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology.

    J. Kidston;E. P. Gerber

  • Tropical teleconnection impacts on Antarctic climate changes

    Xichen Li;Wenju Cai;Wenju Cai;Gerald A. Meehl;Dake Chen

  • The predictability of the extratropical stratosphere on monthly time‐scales and its impact on the skill of tropospheric forecasts

    Om P. Tripathi;Mark Baldwin;Andrew Charlton-Perez;Martin Charron

  • The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP) : experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6

    Davide Zanchettin;Myriam Khodri;Claudia Timmreck;Matthew Toohey;Matthew Toohey

  • A Mechanism and Simple Dynamical Model of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Annular Modes

    Geoffrey K. Vallis;Edwin P. Gerber;Paul J. Kushner;Benjamin A. Cash

  • Assessing and understanding the impact of stratospheric dynamics and variability on the earth system

    Edwin P. Gerber;Amy Butler;Natalia Calvo;Andrew Charlton-Perez

  • Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability

    Edwin P. Gerber;Lorenzo M. Polvani

  • Northern winter climate change: Assessment of uncertainty in CMIP5 projections related to stratosphere-troposphere coupling

    E. Manzini;A. Yu. Karpechko;J. Anstey;M. P. Baldwin

  • Stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and annular mode variability in chemistry‐climate models

    Edwin P. Gerber;Mark P. Baldwin;Hideharu Akiyoshi;John Austin

  • Eddy-zonal flow interactions and the persistence of the zonal index

    Edwin P. Gerber;Geoffrey K. Vallis

  • The Effect of Tropospheric Jet Latitude on Coupling between the Stratospheric Polar Vortex and the Troposphere

    Chaim I. Garfinkel;Darryn W. Waugh;Edwin P. Gerber

  • The Downward Influence of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings: Association with Tropospheric Precursors.

    Ian White;Chaim I. Garfinkel;Edwin P. Gerber;Martin Jucker

  • Testing the Annular Mode Autocorrelation Time Scale in Simple Atmospheric General Circulation Models

    Edwin P. Gerber;Sergey Voronin;Lorenzo M. Polvani

  • Stratospheric Influence on the Tropospheric Circulation Revealed by Idealized Ensemble Forecasts

    E. P. Gerber;Clara Orbe;Lorenzo M. Polvani

  • The role of stratosphere‐troposphere coupling in the occurrence of extreme winter cold spells over northern Europe

    Lorenzo Tomassini;Edwin P. Gerber;Mark P. Baldwin;Felix Bunzel

  • Isca, v1.0: a framework for the global modelling of the atmospheres of Earth and other planets at varying levels of complexity

    Geoffrey K. Vallis;Greg Colyer;Ruth Geen;Edwin Gerber

Frequent Co-Authors

Chaim I. Garfinkel
Chaim I. Garfinkel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Lorenzo M. Polvani Columbia University
Andrew Charlton-Perez
Andrew Charlton-Perez University of Reading
Mark P. Baldwin
Mark P. Baldwin University of Exeter
Seok-Woo Son
Seok-Woo Son Seoul National University
Elisa Manzini
Elisa Manzini Max Planck Society
Amy H. Butler
Amy H. Butler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Michael Sigmond
Michael Sigmond Environment and Climate Change Canada
Geoffrey K. Vallis
Geoffrey K. Vallis University of Exeter
Ryo Mizuta
Ryo Mizuta Japan Meteorological Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also consider complementary online degrees to boost their expertise and job prospects. For those interested in advancing educational leadership roles or research, options like online EdD programs no dissertation offer flexible alternatives that streamline doctoral studies without the added pressure of a dissertation.

Educators aiming to transition from a master’s to a doctoral degree may find the online EdS to EdD bridge program particularly convenient. Such pathways help professionals broaden their qualifications while continuing to work in their field.

For those looking to apply social work principles alongside environmental expertise, online DSW programs provide advanced training with affordability in mind, equipping graduates for impactful community and policy roles.

Finally, students seeking a more interdisciplinary foundation may explore budget-friendly options like the budget friendly online general studies degree. These programs can support environmental sciences knowledge while allowing customization based on career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin P. Gerber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles