World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7615 7316 340 319 90 8355

Michael Sigmond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Sigmond between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Sigmond published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 9 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
2000 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Sigmond: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 7
2011 6
2012 0
2013 5
2014 3
2015 5
2016 6
2017 4
2018 6
2019 8
2020 8
2021 5
2022 12
2023 10
2024 5
2025 4
Total 111
Download as CSV

Michael Sigmond publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sigmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 90
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Sigmond D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sigmond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Sigmond is a researcher affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada. Their work primarily spans Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on the Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change subfields. Additional areas of research include Oceanography, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research topics include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Michael Sigmond has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications. Some recent papers include:

  • "Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss" (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • "Uncertainty in the Response of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupling to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations in CMIP6 Models" (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Long-range prediction and the stratosphere" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Ongoing AMOC and related sea-level and temperature changes after achieving the Paris targets" (2020), published in Nature Climate Change
  • "Quantifying the influence of short-term emission reductions on climate" (2021), published in Science Advances

Frequent coauthors in Michael Sigmond's work include:

  • John C. Fyfe
  • Isla R. Simpson
  • Amy H. Butler
  • Neil C. Swart
  • Clara Deser

The prominent venues where Michael Sigmond's research has appeared comprise:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Climate
  • Nature Communications
  • Science Advances

Best Publications

  • The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3)

    Neil C. Swart;Jason N. S. Cole;Viatcheslav V. Kharin;Mike Lazare

  • Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models

    M. J. Alexander;M. Geller;C. McLandress;S. Polavarapu

  • Simulations of anthropogenic change in the strength of the Brewer–Dobson circulation

    N. Butchart;A. A. Scaife;M. Bourqui;M. Bourqui;J. de Grandpre

  • Enhanced seasonal forecast skill following stratospheric sudden warmings

    M. Sigmond;J. F. Scinocca;V. V. Kharin;T. G. Shepherd;T. G. Shepherd

  • On the Lack of Stratospheric Dynamical Variability in Low‐Top Versions of the CMIP5 Models

    Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;Mark P. Baldwin;Thomas Birner;Robert X. Black

  • Impact of Polar Ozone Depletion on Subtropical Precipitation

    Sarah M. Kang;L. M. Polvani;J. C. Fyfe;M. Sigmond

  • The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification

    Doug M. Smith;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Judah Cohen

  • Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to Arctic sea-ice loss

    Kelly E. McCusker;John C. Fyfe;Michael Sigmond

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Separating the Dynamical Effects of Climate Change and Ozone Depletion. Part II: Southern Hemisphere Troposphere

    Charles McLandress;Theodore G. Shepherd;John F. Scinocca;David A. Plummer

  • The predictability of the extratropical stratosphere on monthly time‐scales and its impact on the skill of tropospheric forecasts

    Om P. Tripathi;Mark Baldwin;Andrew Charlton-Perez;Martin Charron

  • Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere

    N. Butchart;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;I. Cionni;S. C. Hardiman

  • Has the ozone hole contributed to increased Antarctic sea ice extent

    M. Sigmond;J. C. Fyfe

  • Seasonal forecast skill of Arctic sea ice area in a dynamical forecast system

    M. Sigmond;J. C. Fyfe;G. M. Flato;V. V. Kharin

  • The Influence of the Basic State on the Northern Hemisphere Circulation Response to Climate Change

    Michael Sigmond;John F. Scinocca

  • The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in boreal winter?

    Amy H. Butler;Amy H. Butler;Alberto Arribas;Maria Athanassiadou;Johanna Baehr

  • Ice-free Arctic projections under the Paris Agreement

    Michael Sigmond;John C. Fyfe;Neil C. Swart

  • A Simulation of the Separate Climate Effects of Middle-Atmospheric and Tropospheric CO2 Doubling

    M Michael Sigmond;PC Peter Siegmund;E Ezio Manzini;HM Hennie Kelder

  • Enhanced long-range forecast skill in boreal winter following stratospheric strong vortex conditions

    Om P Tripathi;Andrew Charlton-Perez;Michael Sigmond;Frederic Vitart

  • Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere-troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models

    Blanca Ayarzagüena;A. J. Charlton-Perez;A. Butler;Peter Hitchcock

  • Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models

    Piers M. Forster;Victor I. Fomichev;Eugene Rozanov;Chiara Cagnazzo

  • Impact of the stratosphere on tropospheric climate change

    Michael Sigmond;John F. Scinocca;Paul J. Kushner

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Kushner
Paul J. Kushner University of Toronto
Nathan P. Gillett
Nathan P. Gillett University of Victoria
Andrew Charlton-Perez
Andrew Charlton-Perez University of Reading
Viatcheslav V. Kharin
Viatcheslav V. Kharin Environment and Climate Change Canada
John F. Scinocca
John F. Scinocca University of Victoria
Amy H. Butler
Amy H. Butler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
John C. Fyfe
John C. Fyfe University of Victoria
Edwin P. Gerber
Edwin P. Gerber Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Theodore G. Shepherd
Theodore G. Shepherd University of Reading
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Lorenzo M. Polvani Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interconnected fields that enhance understanding of our planet and society. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing the best online geology degree can be a perfect complement, deepening knowledge in earth materials, natural hazards, and resource management.

Geospatial technologies are also vital to environmental research and management. Earning a qualification through the best gis programs equips students with skills to analyze spatial data, a critical asset in conservation, urban planning, and disaster response.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public administration, a focused approach such as a one-year Master of Public Administration can be beneficial. The one year mpa programs offer accelerated paths for professionals to gain leadership skills and navigate government and nonprofit sectors effectively.

Finally, understanding human behaviors and societal impacts is crucial to addressing environmental issues. A foundation in social sciences through the best online bachelor degree in sociology provides insights into social dynamics, which helps design more effective environmental policies and community initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Sigmond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles