World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven C. Hardiman

Steven C. Hardiman

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
12840
World Ranking
3995
National Ranking
304

Steven C. Hardiman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven C. Hardiman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Steven C. Hardiman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven C. Hardiman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven C. Hardiman is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans various subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Environmental Engineering, and Ocean Engineering.

Their research primarily focuses on topics such as Climate Variability and Models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, and Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics.

Recent publications by Steven C. Hardiman include:

  • "Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Historical Simulations With HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 - an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP," 2020, Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Predictability of European winter 2019/20: Indian Ocean dipole impacts on the NAO," 2020, Atmospheric Science Letters

Steven C. Hardiman frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Adam A. Scaife
  • Nick Dunstone
  • Doug Smith
  • Yu Nie
  • Leon Hermanson

Their work is published widely in leading scientific venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric Science Letters
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Best Publications

  • The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations

    David Walters;Anthony J. Baran;Anthony J. Baran;Ian Boutle;Malcolm Brooks

  • The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations

    C. D. Jones;J. K. Hughes;Nicolas Bellouin;S. C. Hardiman

  • The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations

    N. Bellouin;W. J. Collins;I. D. Culverwell

  • Stratospheric influence on tropospheric jet streams, storm tracks and surface weather

    Joseph Kidston;Adam A. Scaife;Steven C. Hardiman;Daniel M. Mitchell

  • Defining Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

    Amy H. Butler;Dian J. Seidel;Steven C. Hardiman;Neal Butchart

  • The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations

    Unknown

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

    S.-W. Son.;E. P. Gerber;J. Perlwitz;J. Perlwitz;L. M. Polvani

  • On the Lack of Stratospheric Dynamical Variability in Low‐Top Versions of the CMIP5 Models

    Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;Mark P. Baldwin;Thomas Birner;Robert X. Black

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Implementation of U.K. Earth system models for CMIP6

    Alistair A. Sellar;Jeremy Walton;Colin G. Jones;Richard Wood

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Tropics and global trends

    A. Gettelman;M. I. Hegglin;S.-W. Son;Jung-Hyun Kim

  • Historical simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6

    Martin B. Andrews;Jeff K. Ridley;Richard A. Wood;Timothy Andrews

  • Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere

    N. Butchart;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;I. Cionni;S. C. Hardiman

  • A lagged response to the 11 year solar cycle in observed winter Atlantic/European weather patterns

    Lesley J. Gray;Adam A. Scaife;Daniel M. Mitchell;Scott Osprey

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Multi‐model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution

    James A. Anstey;Paolo Davini;Lesley J. Gray;Tim J. Woollings

  • Critical Southern Ocean climate model biases traced to atmospheric model cloud errors.

    Patrick Hyder;John M. Edwards;Richard P. Allan;Helene T. Hewitt

  • Climate change projections and stratosphere–troposphere interaction

    Adam A. Scaife;Thomas Spangehl;David R. Fereday;Ulrich Cubasch

  • Northern winter climate change: Assessment of uncertainty in CMIP5 projections related to stratosphere-troposphere coupling

    E. Manzini;A. Yu. Karpechko;J. Anstey;M. P. Baldwin

  • Review of the formulation of present-generation stratospheric chemistry-climate models and associated external forcings

    Olaf Morgenstern;M. A. Giorgetta;K. Shibata;V. Eyring

  • Stratosphere‐troposphere coupling and annular mode variability in chemistry‐climate models

    Edwin P. Gerber;Mark P. Baldwin;Hideharu Akiyoshi;John Austin

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife Met Office
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Martyn P. Chipperfield
Martyn P. Chipperfield University of Leeds
Neal Butchart
Neal Butchart Met Office
Slimane Bekki
Slimane Bekki Sorbonne University
Sandip Dhomse
Sandip Dhomse University of Leeds
Martine Michou
Martine Michou Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Lesley J. Gray
Lesley J. Gray University of Oxford
John F. Scinocca
John F. Scinocca University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise in Environmental Sciences, there are numerous online degree options that complement this field. Many professionals pursue advanced education through programs that do not require a dissertation, such as the online edd no dissertation options, allowing for a flexible path to leadership and research skills without the traditional thesis demand.

Additionally, educators looking to advance their credentials can benefit from online eds to edd bridge program pathways, which facilitate a smooth transition from a master's level to a doctoral degree. These programs help build a robust foundation for those committed to making impactful changes in environmental education.

For practitioners passionate about social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing dsw programs online can provide advanced clinical and policy skills tailored toward community and environmental health challenges.

To start or pivot into this diverse field, affordable online degrees in general studies also offer a practical beginning. The best affordable online general studies degree programs provide broad knowledge bases ideal for learners seeking interdisciplinary approaches to environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Steven C. Hardiman

Trending Scientists