World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
10514
World Ranking
5692
National Ranking
2514

Robert W. Burgess publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 113 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert W. Burgess D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Burgess is affiliated with The Jackson Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focused on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Neuroscience. Within these broader fields, their work addresses subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Neurology, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's research centers on topics including Hereditary Neurological Disorders, RNA Research and Splicing, RNA regulation and disease, Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research, and Signaling Pathways in Disease.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert W. Burgess include:

  • Abigail L. D. Tadenev
  • Timothy J. Hines
  • Joshua A. Weiner
  • Courtney L. Hatton
  • George Murray

Their publications appear regularly in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, Science, Journal of Neuroscience, and Brain Research.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Robert W. Burgess include:

  • "Nicotinamide provides neuroprotection in glaucoma by protecting against mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction" (2021) published in Redox Biology
  • "The integrated stress response contributes to tRNA synthetase-associated peripheral neuropathy" (2021) published in Science
  • "tRNA overexpression rescues peripheral neuropathy caused by mutations in tRNA synthetase" (2021) published in Science
  • "tRNA Dysregulation in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Diseases" (2023) published in Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
  • "NCAM1 and GDF15 are biomarkers of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in patients and mice" (2022) published in Brain

Best Publications

  • Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse

    Weichun Lin;Robert W. Burgess;Bertha Dominguez;Samuel L. Pfaff

  • Corepressor-Dependent Silencing of Chromosomal Regions Encoding Neuronal Genes

    Victoria V. Lunyak;Robert Burgess;Robert Burgess;Gratien G. Prefontaine;Charles Nelson

  • Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo.

    Thomas Misgeld;Thomas Misgeld;Martin Kerschensteiner;Martin Kerschensteiner;Florence M Bareyre;Florence M Bareyre;Robert W Burgess

  • Roles of neurotransmitter in synapse formation: development of neuromuscular junctions lacking choline acetyltransferase.

    Thomas Misgeld;Robert W Burgess;Renate M Lewis;Jeanette M Cunningham

  • Genetic evidence that relative synaptic efficacy biases the outcome of synaptic competition

    Mario Buffelli;Robert W. Burgess;Guoping Feng;Guoping Feng;Corrinne G. Lobe

  • Neurite arborization and mosaic spacing in the mouse retina require DSCAM

    Peter G. Fuerst;Amane Koizumi;Amane Koizumi;Richard H. Masland;Robert W. Burgess

  • Alternatively spliced isoforms of nerve- and muscle-derived agrin: their roles at the neuromuscular junction.

    Robert W Burgess;Quyen T Nguyen;Young-Jin Son;Jeff W Lichtman

  • Distinct requirements for evoked and spontaneous release of neurotransmitter are revealed by mutations in the Drosophila gene neuronal-synaptobrevin.

    David L. Deitcher;Atsushi Ueda;Bryan A. Stewart;Robert W. Burgess

  • An Active Dominant Mutation of Glycyl-tRNA Synthetase Causes Neuropathy in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2D Mouse Model

    Kevin L. Seburn;Leslie A. Nangle;Gregory A. Cox;Paul Schimmel

  • DSCAM and DSCAML1 Function in Self-Avoidance in Multiple Cell Types in the Developing Mouse Retina

    Peter G. Fuerst;Freyja Bruce;Miao Tian;Wei Wei

  • Agrin isoforms with distinct amino termini: differential expression, localization, and function.

    Robert W. Burgess;William C. Skarnes;Joshua R. Sanes

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Impaired protein translation in Drosophila models for Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy caused by mutant tRNA synthetases

    Sven Niehues;Julia Bussmann;Georg Steffes;Ines Erdmann

  • Two-Photon NADH Imaging Exposes Boundaries of Oxygen Diffusion in Cortical Vascular Supply Regions:

    Karl A Kasischke;Elton M Lambert;Ben Panepento;Anita Sun

  • Nicotinamide provides neuroprotection in glaucoma by protecting against mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction.

    James R. Tribble;Amin Otmani;Shanshan Sun;Sevannah A. Ellis

  • Identification and characterization of Drosophila genes for synaptic vesicle proteins

    A DiAntonio;RW Burgess;AC Chin;DL Deitcher

  • Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones

    Ethan R. Graf;Richard W. Daniels;Robert W. Burgess;Thomas L. Schwarz

  • CMT2D neuropathy is linked to the neomorphic binding activity of glycyl-tRNA synthetase

    Weiwei He;Ge Bai;Huihao Zhou;Na Wei

  • A novel mouse model of Niemann–Pick type C disease carrying a D1005G-Npc1 mutation comparable to commonly observed human mutations

    Robert A. Maue;Robert W. Burgess;Bing Wang;Christine M. Wooley

  • Evidence for a conserved function in synapse formation reveals Phr1 as a candidate gene for respiratory failure in newborn mice

    Robert W. Burgess;Kevin A. Peterson;Michael J. Johnson;Jeffrey J. Roix

  • Impaired protein translation in Drosophila models for Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy caused by mutant tRNA synthetases

    Sven Niehues;Julia Bussmann;Georg Steffes;Ines Erdmann

  • Disruption of glomerular basement membrane charge through podocyte-specific mutation of agrin does not alter glomerular permselectivity. Commentary. Author's reply

    Yashpal S. Kanwar;Farhad R. Danesh;Sumant S. Chugh;Scott J. Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua R. Sanes
Joshua R. Sanes Harvard University
Kevin Talbot
Kevin Talbot University of Oxford
Thomas Schwarz
Thomas Schwarz Boston Children's Hospital
Xiang-Lei Yang
Xiang-Lei Yang Scripps Research Institute
Jeff W. Lichtman
Jeff W. Lichtman Harvard University
Giampietro Schiavo
Giampietro Schiavo University College London
David L.H. Bennett
David L.H. Bennett University of Oxford
Samuel L. Pfaff
Samuel L. Pfaff Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Albena Jordanova
Albena Jordanova University of Antwerp
Susan L. Ackerman
Susan L. Ackerman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students have an array of flexible and rewarding education options available online. If you're seeking a fast track to your degree, consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees that allow you to complete your studies quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Neuroscience is closely linked with some of the highest paying majors in health, science, and technology fields. Graduates consistently find opportunities among the most lucrative college majors, with career paths in research, healthcare, data science, and biotechnology.

If affordability is a priority, look for online colleges that accept fafsa to maximize financial aid and minimize student debt. With these diverse options, pursuing neuroscience in the USA can be both financially accessible and professionally rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Burgess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles