World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
16589
World Ranking
4633
National Ranking
357

Mark P. Baldwin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark P. Baldwin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1931 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Mark P. Baldwin is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research work spans subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, as well as intersections with Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist has addressed topics including Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Climate Variability and Models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Climate Change Policy and Economics, and Climate Change and Geoengineering.

Recent publications include:

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Impacts, processes and projections of the quasi-biennial oscillation, 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Long-range prediction and the stratosphere, 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Solving the climate crisis: lessons from ozone depletion and COVID-19, 2020, Global Sustainability
  • Long-range predictability of extratropical climate and the length of day, 2022, Nature Geoscience

Frequent co-authors in Baldwin's research include Thomas Birner, Neal Butchart, Amy H. Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen.

The scientist's work appears regularly in various publication venues, notably Reviews of Geophysics, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Global Sustainability, and Nature Geoscience.

Mark P. Baldwin has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • The quasi-biennial oscillation

    M. P. Baldwin;L. J. Gray;T. J. Dunkerton;K. Hamilton

  • Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes.

    Mark P. Baldwin;Timothy J. Dunkerton

  • Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere

    Mark P. Baldwin;Timothy J. Dunkerton

  • Stratospheric influence on tropospheric jet streams, storm tracks and surface weather

    Joseph Kidston;Adam A. Scaife;Steven C. Hardiman;Daniel M. Mitchell

  • Stratospheric memory and skill of extended-range weather forecasts

    Mark P. Baldwin;David B. Stephenson;David W. J. Thompson;Timothy J. Dunkerton

  • Stratospheric Connection to Northern Hemisphere Wintertime Weather: Implications for Prediction

    David W. J. Thompson;Mark P. Baldwin;John M. Wallace

  • Storm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change

    T. A. Shaw;M. Baldwin;E. A. Barnes;Rodrigo Caballero

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

    Mark P. Baldwin;Blanca Ayarzagüena;Thomas Birner;Thomas Birner;Neal Butchart

  • On the Lack of Stratospheric Dynamical Variability in Low‐Top Versions of the CMIP5 Models

    Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;Mark P. Baldwin;Thomas Birner;Robert X. Black

  • A critical comparison of stratosphere–troposphere coupling indices

    Mark P. Baldwin;David W.J. Thompson

  • The influence of stratospheric vortex displacements and splits on surface climate

    Daniel M. Mitchell;Lesley J. Gray;James Anstey;Mark P. Baldwin

  • Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in the Southern Hemisphere

    David W. J. Thompson;Mark P. Baldwin;Susan Solomon

  • The role of the stratosphere in subseasonal to seasonal prediction Part II: Predictability arising from stratosphere ‐ troposphere coupling

    Daniela I. V. Domeisen;Amy H. Butler;Amy H. Butler;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;Blanca Ayarzagüena;Blanca Ayarzagüena

  • The SPARC Intercomparison of Middle-Atmosphere Climatologies.

    William Randel;Petra Udelhofen;Eric Fleming;Marvin Geller

  • Atmospheric processes governing the Northern Hemisphere annular mode/north Atlantic Oscillation

    David W. J. Thompson;Sukyoung Lee;Mark P. Baldwin

  • The predictability of the extratropical stratosphere on monthly time‐scales and its impact on the skill of tropospheric forecasts

    Om P. Tripathi;Mark Baldwin;Andrew Charlton-Perez;Martin Charron

  • Seasonal winter forecasts and the stratosphere

    A. A. Scaife;A. Yu. Karpechko;M. P. Baldwin;A. Brookshaw

  • The Role of the Stratosphere in Subseasonal to Seasonal Prediction: 1. Predictability of the Stratosphere

    Daniela I.V. Domeisen;Amy H. Butler;Amy H. Butler;Andrew J. Charlton‐Perez;Blanca Ayarzagüena;Blanca Ayarzagüena

  • Quasi-biennial Modulation of Planetary-Wave Fluxes in the Northern Hemisphere Winter

    Timothy J. Dunkerton;Mark P. Baldwin

  • The quasi‐biennial oscillation: Analysis using ERA‐40 data

    Charlotte L. Pascoe;Lesley J. Gray;Simon A. Crooks;Martin N. Juckes

  • Observed correlations between winter-mean tropospheric and stratospheric circulation anomalies

    Mark P. Baldwin;Xinhua Cheng;Timothy J. Dunkerton

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Dunkerton
Timothy J. Dunkerton Northwest Research Associates
Lesley J. Gray
Lesley J. Gray University of Oxford
Andrew Charlton-Perez
Andrew Charlton-Perez University of Reading
Edwin P. Gerber
Edwin P. Gerber Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Thomas Birner
Thomas Birner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
David W. J. Thompson
David W. J. Thompson University of East Anglia
Amy H. Butler
Amy H. Butler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Adam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife Met Office
Elisa Manzini
Elisa Manzini Max Planck Society
Seok-Woo Son
Seok-Woo Son Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address today’s complex ecological challenges. For example, a gis degree equips students with advanced skills in spatial data analysis, crucial for natural resource management and environmental planning.

Public policy and administration also play a critical role in environmental solutions. Pursuing one of the top online mpa programs enables professionals to influence environmental regulations and sustainable development practices effectively.

Understanding social behavior and community dynamics is equally important. An online sociology bachelor programs provide insights into how societies interact with environmental issues, aiding in the design of impactful outreach and conservation strategies.

For educators and leaders in environmental education, advanced degrees like online edd programs no dissertation offer flexible pathways to enhance leadership skills without the lengthy dissertation process.

Choosing complementary online degrees can therefore broaden career prospects in environmental science, merging technical knowledge with policy, social sciences, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark P. Baldwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles