World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
14224
World Ranking
4030
National Ranking
153

Mark S. Fox publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Fox sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark S. Fox D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Fox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to constraint-directed reasoning and ontologies

Overview

Mark S. Fox is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields and focus areas, including artificial intelligence, building and construction, global and planetary change, economics and econometrics, and management information systems.

The scientist's work notably covers key topics such as:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Smart Cities and Technologies

Mark S. Fox's research is disseminated across multiple publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Urban Science
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several peers, including:

  • Bart Gajderowicz
  • Daniel Silver
  • Daniela Roşu
  • Patrick Adler
  • Thiago H. Silva

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Mark S. Fox include:

  • "An ontology engineering approach to measuring city education system performance" (2021), Expert Systems with Applications
  • "Towards a Model of Urban Evolution-Part I: Context" (2022), Urban Science
  • "Towards a Model of Urban Evolution Part IV: Evolutionary (Formetic) Distance-An Interpretation of Yelp Review Data" (2022), Urban Science

Their publication record also intersects with other research contributions by different authors, including papers on urban evolution, water-human-computer interface, and exposure to certain species in urban areas.

Mark S. Fox was recognized as an IEEE Fellow in 2019 for contributions to constraint-directed reasoning and ontologies.

Best Publications

  • An organizational view of distributed systems

    Mark S. Fox

  • ISIS—a knowledge‐based system for factory scheduling

    Mark S. Fox;Stephen F. Smith

  • Constraint-Directed Search: A Case Study of Job-Shop Scheduling

    Mark Stephen Fox

  • Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management

    Mark S. Fox;Mihai Barbuceanu;Rune Teigen

  • An organisation ontology for enterprise modeling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour

    Mark S. Fox;Mihai Barbuceanu;Michael Gruninger

  • An organisation ontology for enterprise modelling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour

    M.S. Fox;M. Barbuceanu;M. Gruninger

  • Intelligent Scheduling

    Monte Zweben;Mark Fox

  • The Role of Competency Questions in Enterprise Engineering

    Michael Grüninger;Mark S. Fox

  • COOL: A Language for Describing Coordination in Multi Agent Systems.

    Mihai Barbuceanu;Mark S. Fox

  • The TOVE Project Towards a Common-Sense Model of the Enterprise

    Mark S. Fox

  • Distributed constrained heuristic search

    K. Sycara;S.F. Roth;N. Sadeh;M.S. Fox

  • The Integrated Supply Chain Management System

    Mark S. Fox;John F. Chionglo;Mihai Barbuceanu

  • Variable and value ordering heuristics for the job shop scheduling constraint satisfaction problem

    Norman Sadeh;Mark S. Fox

  • Construction and maintaining detailed production plans: Investigations into the development of knowledge-based factory scheduling systems

    Stephen F Smith;Mark S Fox;Peng Si Ow

  • A Requirement Ontology for Engineering Design

    Jinxin Lin;Mark S. Fox;Taner Bilgic

  • A COMMON-SENSE MODEL OF THE ENTERPRISE

    Mark S. Fox;John F. Chionglo;Fadi G. Fadel

  • Constrained heuristic search

    Mark S. Fox;Norman Sadeh;Can Baykan

  • Ontologies to Support Process Integration in Enterprise Engineering

    Michael Grüninger;Katy Atefi;Mark S. Fox

  • Ontologies for Enterprise Modelling

    Mark S. Fox;Michael Grüninger

  • Constraint-directed negotiation of resource reallocations

    Arvind Sathi;Mark S. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Gruninger
Michael Gruninger University of Toronto
Norman Sadeh
Norman Sadeh Carnegie Mellon University
J. Christopher Beck
J. Christopher Beck University of Toronto
Stephen F. Smith
Stephen F. Smith Carnegie Mellon University
Katia Sycara
Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Arijit Sengupta
Arijit Sengupta Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
Mark Chignell
Mark Chignell University of Toronto
Scott Sanner
Scott Sanner University of Toronto
Peter Spirtes
Peter Spirtes Carnegie Mellon University
Amer Shalaby
Amer Shalaby University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible study options. For those interested in advanced scientific concepts, an online theoretical physics degree blends computational skills with fundamental science—perfect for analytical minds.

Data science continues to grow as a leading tech career. Earning an affordable data science degree can provide essential skills in analytics, machine learning, and big data. This pathway remains a strong choice for those seeking high-impact roles in tech and business.

If you are interested in designing the technologies that power our world, consider the best online electrical engineering programs USA. These programs offer training in hardware, robotics, and systems important to modern industries.

Short on time? There are also quick certifications that pay well for those looking to boost their resume fast. Certifications in coding, cybersecurity, or IT support can quickly open up new career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Fox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles