World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
92
Citations
30051
World Ranking
548
National Ranking
32

Francisco Chiclana publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Chiclana sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 378 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Francisco Chiclana D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Chiclana sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Francisco Chiclana is affiliated with De Montfort University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with specific emphasis on management science and operations research, artificial intelligence, statistical and nonlinear physics, computational theory and mathematics, and computer networks and communications.

The main topics covered in Francisco Chiclana's work include multi-criteria decision making, opinion dynamics and social influence, cognitive science and mapping, complex network analysis techniques, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, rough sets and fuzzy logic, and software reliability and analysis research.

These areas are explored through frequent contributions to respected publication venues, including:

  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • Information Fusion
  • IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Mathematics

Recent representative papers authored by Francisco Chiclana highlight their research interests and contributions:

  • "Revisiting Fuzzy and Linguistic Decision Making: Scenarios and Challenges for Making Wiser Decisions in a Better Way" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • "Social Trust Driven Consensus Reaching Model With a Minimum Adjustment Feedback Mechanism Considering Assessments-Modifications Willingness" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • "An Optimal Feedback Model to Prevent Manipulation Behavior in Consensus Under Social Network Group Decision Making" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  • "Two-Fold Personalized Feedback Mechanism for Social Network Consensus by Uninorm Interval Trust Propagation" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • "Consensus-trust Driven Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism for Improving Consensus in Social Network Large-group Decision Making" (2022), published in Group Decision and Negotiation

Francisco Chiclana's frequent co-authors include:

  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
  • Karen Panetta
  • Giancarlo Fortino
  • Róbert Kozma
  • Sos С. Agaian

Best Publications

  • Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations

    Enrique Herrera-Viedma;Francisco Herrera;Francisco Chiclana;María Luque

  • Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations

    F. Chiclana;F. Herrera;E. Herrera-Viedma

  • A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures

    E. Herrera-Viedma;F. Herrera;F. Chiclana

  • A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations

    E. Herrera-Viedma;S. Alonso;F. Chiclana;F. Herrera

  • A Consensus Support System Model for Group Decision-Making Problems With Multigranular Linguistic Preference Relations

    E. Herrera-Viedma;L. Martinez;F. Mata;F. Chiclana

  • Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency

    E. Herrera-Viedma;F. Chiclana;F. Herrera;S. Alonso

  • Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations

    Francisco Chiclana;Francisco Herrera;Enrique Herrera-Viedma

  • Multiperson decision making based on multiplicative preference relations.

    Francisco Herrera;Enrique Herrera-Viedma;Francisco Chiclana

  • A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research

    Huchang Liao;Ming Tang;Li Luo;Chunyang Li

  • Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects

    F. Herrera;S. Alonso;F. Chiclana;E. Herrera-Viedma

  • Consensus Reaching in Social Network Group Decision Making: Research Paradigms and Challenges

    Yucheng Dong;Quanbo Zha;Hengjie Zhang;Gang Kou

  • A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation

    Jian Wu;Francisco Chiclana;Hamido Fujita;Enrique Herrera-Viedma

  • Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations

    Francisco Chiclana;Enrique Herrera-Viedma;Francisco Herrera;Sergio Alonso

  • Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity

    F. Chiclana;E. Herrera-Viedma;S. Alonso;F. Herrera

  • Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context

    Jian Wu;Francisco Chiclana;Enrique Herrera-Viedma

  • A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making

    F. Chiclana;J. M. Tapia GarcíA;M. J. Del Moral;E. Herrera-Viedma

  • A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks

    Raquel Ureña;Gang Kou;Yucheng Dong;Francisco Chiclana;Francisco Chiclana

  • A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust

    Jian Wu;Lifang Dai;Francisco Chiclana;Hamido Fujita

  • A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences

    S. Alonso;E. Herrera-Viedma;F. Chiclana;F. Herrera

  • Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making

    R. Ureña;F. Chiclana;J.A. Morente-Molinera;E. Herrera-Viedma

Frequent Co-Authors

Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Enrique Herrera-Viedma University of Granada
Francisco Herrera
Francisco Herrera University of Granada
Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
Francisco Javier Cabrerizo University of Granada
Hamido Fujita
Hamido Fujita University of Technology Malaysia
Yucheng Dong
Yucheng Dong Sichuan University
Robert John
Robert John University of Nottingham
Jonathan M. Garibaldi
Jonathan M. Garibaldi University of Nottingham
Luis Martínez
Luis Martínez University of Jaén
Le Hoang Son
Le Hoang Son Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Hengjie Zhang
Hengjie Zhang Hohai University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies in the USA opens up a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways. Today, many top universities offer online degree programs accredited by recognized agencies, ensuring a quality education for remote learners.

For those drawn to the creative side of technology, a game art degree online provides the skills needed to excel in the booming video game industry. Meanwhile, students interested in protecting data and digital assets can consider an accredited online cyber security degree, which is highly valued in today’s job market.

Computer science knowledge is also valuable in interdisciplinary fields. For example, an online construction management masters integrates project management, technology, and real-world applications.

By choosing the right online pathway, students can match their interests and career goals while benefiting from flexibility and a wide range of opportunities in the digital age.

Best Scientists Citing Francisco Chiclana

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles