World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 81 3176 2867 177 158 455 52252

Mark T. D. Cronin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark T. D. Cronin between 1955 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark T. D. Cronin published across 72 years, from 1955 to 2026, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 162 publications in 2025. 164 of the 689 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 162. Peak 162 publications in 2025. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 40 publications 2025: 162 publications 2026: 2 publications
1955 2026

689 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark T. D. Cronin: publications per year, 1955 to 2026
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 8
1996 6
1997 7
1998 8
1999 4
2000 12
2001 12
2002 15
2003 22
2004 15
2005 19
2006 14
2007 14
2008 23
2009 12
2010 21
2011 24
2012 12
2013 35
2014 21
2015 27
2016 13
2017 27
2018 17
2019 21
2020 10
2021 23
2022 18
2023 13
2024 40
2025 162
2026 2
Total 689
Download as CSV

Mark T. D. Cronin publications per year - data summary

  • Mark T. D. Cronin, a Chemistry scholar from Liverpool John Moores University, has 689 publications recorded across 72 years, from 1955 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1955 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2025, with 162 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1955, 1979, 1989, 1990 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 32 of the 72 years in the span carry no publications at all (1956, 1957, 1958, 1959 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.2 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 235 publications, 34% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1955-1978: 1 publication (0.0 per year); 1979-2002: 83 publications (3.5 per year); 2003-2026: 605 publications (25.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mark T. D. Cronin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. D. Cronin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 455 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270 455
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark T. D. Cronin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 61–80 to 1,295+ publications.
  • Mark T. D. Cronin, a Chemistry scholar from Liverpool John Moores University, records 455 publications - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Mark T. D. Cronin, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 241–260 publications range, and Mark T. D. Cronin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 161–180 publications, holding 1,350 scientists (8% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 361–380 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mark T. D. Cronin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. D. Cronin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354 81
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Mark T. D. Cronin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 159+ D-Index.
  • Mark T. D. Cronin, a Chemistry scholar from Liverpool John Moores University, records 81 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Mark T. D. Cronin, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 62–63 D-Index range, and Mark T. D. Cronin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 56–57 D-Index, holding 1,051 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Mark T. D. Cronin is affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields, with primary focus areas including Medicine, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Veterinary studies.

The scientist's work covers various subfields, notably Dermatology, Small Animals, Plant Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The main topics explored by Mark T. D. Cronin in the scientific literature are:

  • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

The scientist has contributed extensively to several publication venues. The most frequent among these are:

  • Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Computational Toxicology
  • Toxicology Letters
  • Archives of Toxicology

The following recent papers illustrate the breadth of research interests and outputs:

  • "GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making" (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications" (2020), published in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
  • "Quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) models for toxicity prediction" (2020), published in Archives of Toxicology
  • "Use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory decisions for chemical safety: Report from an EPAA Deep Dive Workshop" (2022), published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • "A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH" (2022), published in Archives of Toxicology

Mark T. D. Cronin has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Debra L. Laskin
  • A Bryant-Friedrich
  • H. Chon
  • S Crotty
  • J Muldoon

Best Publications

  • Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease

    Marian Valko;Dieter Leibfritz;Jan Moncol;Mark T.D. Cronin

  • Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress.

    M. Valko;H. Morris;M. T.D. Cronin

  • QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?

    Artem Cherkasov;Eugene N. Muratov;Eugene N. Muratov;Denis Fourches;Alexandre Varnek

  • Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.

    Lennart Eriksson;Joanna Jaworska;Andrew P Worth;Mark T D Cronin

  • A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity.

    T.W. Schultz;P. Amcoff;E. Berggren;F. Gautier

  • Light-generated oligonucleotide arrays for rapid DNA sequence analysis.

    Unknown

  • How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR)

    J C Dearden;M T D Cronin;K L E Kaiser

  • Pitfalls in QSAR

    Mark T.D. Cronin;T.Wayne Schultz

  • Applying Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) to support Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA)

    Knut Erik Tollefsen;Stefan Scholz;Mark T. Cronin;Stephen W. Edwards

  • Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: a historical perspective

    T.Wayne Schultz;Mark T.D. Cronin;John D. Walker;Aynur O. Aptula

  • Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption.

    G.P. Moss;J.C. Dearden;H. Patel;M.T.D. Cronin

  • Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

    Mark T D Cronin;Joanna S Jaworska;John D Walker;Michael H I Comber

  • Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology.

    Johannes A H Schwöbel;Yana K Koleva;Steven J Enoch;Fania Bajot

  • Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals.

    Hiren Patel;Wil ten Berge;Mark T.D. Cronin

  • Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment.

    Elina Drakvik;Elina Drakvik;Rolf Altenburger;Yasunobu Aoki;Thomas Backhaus

  • Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate

    Mark Cronin;David Livingstone

  • A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent protein binding relevant to toxicity.

    S. J. Enoch;C. M. Ellison;T. W. Schultz;M. T. D. Cronin

  • Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances.

    Mark T D Cronin;John D Walker;Joanna S Jaworska;Michael H I Comber

  • In silico toxicology protocols.

    Glenn J. Myatt;Ernst Ahlberg;Yumi Akahori;David Allen

  • Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.

    Mark T.D Cronin;Aynur O Aptula;Judith C Duffy;Tatiana I Netzeva

  • Recent Advances in QSAR Studies

    Tomasz Puzyn;Jerzy Leszczynski;Mark T. Cronin

  • Quantitative structure-activity analyses of nitrobenzene toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis

    M T Cronin;B W Gregory;Terry W Schultz

  • Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms

    Nazanin Golbamaki;Bakhtiyor Rasulev;Bakhtiyor Rasulev;Antonio Cassano;Richard L. Marchese Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Dearden
John C. Dearden Liverpool John Moores University
David W. Roberts
David W. Roberts Liverpool John Moores University
Thomas Hartung
Thomas Hartung Johns Hopkins University
Gerrit Schüürmann
Gerrit Schüürmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Alan R. Boobis
Alan R. Boobis Imperial College London
Mathieu Vinken
Mathieu Vinken Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Michael Schwarz
Michael Schwarz University of Tübingen
Michael R. Berthold
Michael R. Berthold University of Konstanz
Bob van de Water
Bob van de Water Leiden University
David A. Basketter
David A. Basketter University of Bedfordshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities beyond traditional laboratory roles. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a pharmacist is a rewarding option. Insights on how to become a pharmacist reveal the importance of specialized education and licensure in this vital field.

Alternatively, combining chemistry with forensic sciences can lead to unique career paths. Pursuing an online master's in forensic psychology provides a solid foundation for understanding criminal behavior while leveraging scientific expertise. Forensic science online degree programs offer accessible ways to gain critical skills in crime lab analysis and evidence interpretation without relocating.

Another specialized route includes working as an autopsy technician. This role focuses on assisting medical examiners with postmortem examinations. Exploring job outlooks and autopsy technician salary information is essential for those considering this niche but impactful profession.

Each pathway emphasizes the value of tailored education and ongoing professional development. Embracing relevant online degrees can enhance flexibility and affordability while preparing students for a range of dynamic careers connected to chemistry and applied sciences.

Explore more about how to become a pharmacist, autopsy technician salary, forensic science online degree, and online master's in forensic psychology to find the best fit for your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark T. D. Cronin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles