World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
9559
World Ranking
15137
National Ranking
843

John C. Dearden publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Dearden sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 170 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

John C. Dearden D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Dearden sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Dearden is affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom. Their research encompasses various areas within computer science, focusing notably on computational theory and mathematics.

Their publication record includes contributions to multiple fields, with key subfields including computational theory and mathematics, small animals, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, electrochemistry, and plant science.

The primary topics explored in their work include computational drug discovery methods, animal testing and alternatives, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, electrochemical analysis and applications, pesticide exposure and toxicity, as well as vitamin D research studies.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by John C. Dearden are as follows:

  • Prediction of Human Lethal Doses and Concentrations of MEIC Chemicals from Rodent LD50 Values: An Attempt to Make Some Reparation, 2021, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
  • Effect of the structural factors of organic compounds on the acute toxicity toward Daphnia magna, 2020, SAR and QSAR in environmental research
  • Rodent LD50 Tests, 2020, International Journal of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships
  • QSAR Modeling: Where Have You Been? Where Are You Going To?, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Correlation between vitamin D levels, individual and socio-demographic characteristics and COVID-19 infection and death rates in 20 European countries: A modelling study, 2020, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Mark Hewitt
  • O.V. Tinkov
  • V.Y. Grigorev
  • Alexander N. Razdolsky
  • L.D. Grigoryeva

The venues where John C. Dearden has published more than once reflect the range of topics addressed in their work and include:

  • Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
  • SAR and QSAR in environmental research
  • International Journal of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships
  • UNC Libraries
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Best Publications

  • QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?

    Artem Cherkasov;Eugene N. Muratov;Eugene N. Muratov;Denis Fourches;Alexandre Varnek

  • How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR)

    J C Dearden;M T D Cronin;K L E Kaiser

  • The Measurement of Partition Coefficients

    John C. Dearden;Gaynor M. Bresnen

  • In silico prediction of drug toxicity.

    John C. Dearden

  • Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption.

    G.P. Moss;J.C. Dearden;H. Patel;M.T.D. Cronin

  • The History and Development of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs)

    John C. Dearden

  • 2-Heteroarylimino-5-benzylidene-4-thiazolidinones analogues of 2-thiazolylimino-5-benzylidene-4-thiazolidinones with antimicrobial activity: synthesis and structure-activity relationship.

    Paola Vicini;Athina Geronikaki;Matteo Incerti;Franca Zani

  • Investigation of the mechanism of flux across human skin in vitro by quantitative structure–permeability relationships

    M.T.D. Cronin;J.C. Dearden;G.P. Moss;G. Murray-Dickson

  • Design, synthesis, computational and biological evaluation of new anxiolytics.

    Athina Geronikaki;Eugeni Babaev;John Dearden;Wim Dehaen

  • Quantitative structure-property relationships for prediction of boiling point, vapor pressure, and melting point

    John C. Dearden

  • QSAR in Toxicology. 1. Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity

    Mark T. D. Cronin;John C. Dearden

  • Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure-activity relationships.

    John D. Walker;Joanna Jaworska;Mike H. I. Comber;T. Wayne Schultz

  • The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity : The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM Workshop 24)

    John C. Dearden;Martin D. Barratt;Romualdo Benigni;Douglas W. Bristol

  • In silico prediction of aqueous solubility

    John C Dearden

  • Partitioning and lipophilicity in quantitative structure-activity relationships.

    Unknown

  • QSAR study of the toxicity of benzoic acids to Vibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and carp

    Y.H. Zhao;G.D. Ji;M.T.D. Cronin;J.C. Dearden

  • Structure-based classification of antibacterial activity.

    Mark T. D. Cronin;Aynur O. Aptula;John C. Dearden;Judith C. Duffy

  • In silico prediction of aqueous solubility: the solubility challenge.

    Mark Hewitt;Mark T. D. Cronin;Steven J. Enoch;Judith C. Madden

  • Linear QSAR regression models for the prediction of bioconcentration factors by physicochemical properties and structural theoretical molecular descriptors

    E. Papa;J.C. Dearden;P. Gramatica

  • Design of new cognition enhancers: from computer prediction to synthesis and biological evaluation.

    Athina A. Geronikaki;John C. Dearden;Dmitrii Filimonov;Irina Galaeva

  • QSAR Study of the Toxicity of Nitrobenzenes to Tetrahymena pyriformis

    John C. Dearden;Mark T. D. Cronin;T. Wayne Schultz;David T. Lin

  • QSAR studies of comparative toxicity in aquatic organisms.

    M.T.D. Cronin;J.C. Dearden;A.J. Dobbs

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark T. D. Cronin
Mark T. D. Cronin Liverpool John Moores University
Vladimir Poroikov
Vladimir Poroikov Institute of Business & Medical Careers
David W. Roberts
David W. Roberts Liverpool John Moores University
Gerrit Schüürmann
Gerrit Schüürmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Eugene N. Muratov
Eugene N. Muratov University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Denis Fourches
Denis Fourches North Carolina State University
Johann Gasteiger
Johann Gasteiger University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Viviana Consonni
Viviana Consonni University of Milano-Bicocca
Alexander Tropsha
Alexander Tropsha University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ian T. Cousins
Ian T. Cousins Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to several dynamic career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through related online degrees. For instance, obtaining a paralegal certificate can complement a chemistry background for those interested in patent law or regulatory compliance careers.

Another promising avenue is pharmaceutical sales, where a strong foundation in chemistry is invaluable. Learning more about how to get into pharmaceutical sales can guide students seeking roles that blend science with business and communication.

For individuals aiming higher in the healthcare field, becoming a pharmacist offers a rewarding path. Insights into pharmacist salary and education requirements can help chemistry graduates make informed career decisions.

Those interested in forensic science or pathology might explore opportunities related to medical examiner roles. Discovering how to become a medical examiner assistant provides practical knowledge about this specialized field and its job outlook.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Dearden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles