World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
16493
World Ranking
2462
National Ranking
138

Andreas Bender publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Bender sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 290 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andreas Bender D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Bender sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Bender is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has a significant research presence in the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and computer science. Their research contributions span several fields with a concentration in molecular biology and computational theory and mathematics. This multidisciplinary approach supports a focus on computational drug discovery methods, cell image analysis techniques, and machine learning applications in materials science.

The scientist's work addresses important topics such as pharmacogenetics and drug metabolism, bioinformatics and genomic networks, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, and protein structure and dynamics. Their research outputs reflect a sustained engagement with the chemical sciences and drug discovery domains, particularly leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence methods.

Recent papers authored by Andreas Bender include:

  • Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: what is realistic, what are illusions? Part 1: Ways to make an impact, and why we are not there yet (2020, Drug Discovery Today)
  • Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: what is realistic, what are illusions? Part 2: a discussion of chemical and biological data (2021, Drug Discovery Today)
  • Evaluation guidelines for machine learning tools in the chemical sciences (2022, Nature Reviews Chemistry)

Among frequent co-authors associated with the scientist are Srijit Seal, Ola Spjuth, Maria-Anna Trapotsi, Jordi Carreras-Puigvert, and Anne E. Carpenter. These collaborative relationships contribute to the interdisciplinary nature of the researcher's work.

The publication venues where Andreas Bender has contributed extensively include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Cheminformatics, and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. These platforms reflect a broad dissemination strategy across preprint servers and peer-reviewed journals prioritized in computational and chemical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics.

    Andreas Bender;Robert C. Glen

  • Online chemical modeling environment (OCHEM): web platform for data storage, model development and publishing of chemical information

    Iurii Sushko;Sergii Novotarskyi;Robert Körner;Anil Kumar Pandey

  • DeepSynergy: predicting anti-cancer drug synergy with Deep Learning.

    Kristina Preuer;Richard P I Lewis;Sepp Hochreiter;Andreas Bender

  • Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review

    Thomas Scior;Andreas Bender;Gary Tresadern;José L. Medina-Franco

  • Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance

    Andreas Bender;Hamse Y. Mussa;Robert C. Glen;Stephan Reiling

  • Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action

    Daniel W. Young;Andreas Bender;Jonathan Hoyt;Elizabeth McWhinnie

  • Analysis of pharmacology data and the prediction of adverse drug reactions and off-target effects from chemical structure.

    Andreas Bender;Josef Scheiber;Meir Glick;John W. Davies

  • Diversity-oriented synthesis; a spectrum of approaches and results

    Richard J. Spandl;Andreas Bender;David R. Spring

  • How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space

    Andreas Bender;Jeremy L. Jenkins;Josef Scheiber;Sai Chetan K. Sukuru

  • From in silico target prediction to multi-target drug design: Current databases, methods and applications

    Alexios Koutsoukas;Benjamin Simms;Johannes Kirchmair;Peter J. Bond

  • Computational prediction of metabolism: sites, products, SAR, P450 enzyme dynamics, and mechanisms.

    Johannes Kirchmair;Mark J. Williamson;Jonathan D Tyzack;Lu Ping Tan

  • Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling: using cellular effects to characterize small-molecule compounds

    Yan Feng;Timothy J. Mitchison;Andreas Bender;Daniel W. Young

  • Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier

    Andreas Bender;Hamse Y. Mussa;Robert C. Glen;Stephan Reiling

  • Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: what is realistic, what are illusions? Part 1: Ways to make an impact, and why we are not there yet

    Andreas Bender;Andreas Bender;Isidro Cortés-Ciriano

  • Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME.

    Robert C Glem;Andreas Bender;Catrin H Arnby;Lars Carlsson

  • Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.

    James H. Nettles;Jeremy L. Jenkins;Andreas Bender;Zhan Deng

  • Melting point prediction employing k-nearest neighbor algorithms and genetic parameter optimization.

    Florian Nigsch;Andreas Bender;Bernd van Buuren;Jos Tissen

  • In silico target fishing: Predicting biological targets from chemical structure

    Jeremy L. Jenkins;Andreas Bender;John W. Davies

  • A discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication.

    Andreas Bender;Robert C. Glen

  • Modeling Promiscuity Based on in vitro Safety Pharmacology Profiling Data

    Kamal Azzaoui;Jacques Hamon;Bernard Faller;Steven Whitebread

  • Proteochemometric modeling as a tool to design selective compounds and for extrapolating to novel targets

    Gerard J. P. van Westen;Jörg K. Wegner;Adriaan P. IJzerman;Herman W. T. van Vlijmen

  • Mapping adverse drug reactions in chemical space.

    Josef Scheiber;Jeremy L. Jenkins;Sai Chetan K. Sukuru;Andreas Bender

  • Gaining insight into off-target mediated effects of drug candidates with a comprehensive systems chemical biology analysis.

    Josef Scheiber;Bin Chen;Mariusz Milik;Sai Chetan K. Sukuru

Frequent Co-Authors

Kanchugarakoppal S. Rangappa
Kanchugarakoppal S. Rangappa University of Mysore
Adriaan P. IJzerman
Adriaan P. IJzerman Leiden University
David R. Spring
David R. Spring University of Cambridge
N. W. Halverson
N. W. Halverson University of Colorado Boulder
Ola Engkvist
Ola Engkvist AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Gautam Sethi
Gautam Sethi National University of Singapore
Adrian T. Lee
Adrian T. Lee University of California, Berkeley
John E. Carlstrom
John E. Carlstrom University of Chicago
Christian L. Reichardt
Christian L. Reichardt University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens many career opportunities, whether you’re interested in software development, data analysis, or engineering. A popular path is pursuing a data scientist degree, as data science roles are in high demand across several industries.

For those considering engineering, accredited programs can be found in the online electrical engineering degree ranking. These programs offer flexibility, allowing you to balance your studies with other commitments.

If you're looking for quicker ways to boost your employability, there are easy certifications to get online that can lead to high-paying jobs, enhancing your technical skills without a long-term commitment.

Additionally, some learners seek the fastest possible advancement with the quickest masters degree online. Choosing the right pathway depends on your goals, budget, and timeline. Online options make it easier than ever to upskill and enter in-demand fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Bender

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles