World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5291 5142 317 314 158 11896

Ola Engkvist publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ola Engkvist between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ola Engkvist published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2024. 68 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2024. 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 45 publications 2025: 23 publications
1996 2025

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ola Engkvist: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 4
1997 5
1998 3
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 6
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
2013 3
2014 9
2015 8
2016 7
2017 9
2018 13
2019 22
2020 25
2021 39
2022 31
2023 25
2024 45
2025 23
Total 310
Download as CSV

Ola Engkvist publications per year - data summary

  • Ola Engkvist, a Computer Science scholar from AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), has 310 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 45 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 30 years in the span carries no publications at all (2007).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.7 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 163 publications, 53% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2005: 31 publications (3.1 per year); 2006-2015: 40 publications (4.0 per year); 2016-2025: 239 publications (23.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ola Engkvist publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ola Engkvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 158
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ola Engkvist publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Ola Engkvist, a Computer Science scholar from AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), records 158 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Ola Engkvist, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Ola Engkvist ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ola Engkvist D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ola Engkvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Ola Engkvist D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Ola Engkvist, a Computer Science scholar from AstraZeneca (United Kingdom), records 51 D-Index - the 63rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 63% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Ola Engkvist, and about 37% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Ola Engkvist ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ola Engkvist is affiliated with AstraZeneca in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record in the domains of computer science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans key areas within computational theory and mathematics, molecular biology, materials chemistry, artificial intelligence, and biomedical engineering.

The primary topics engaged by Engkvist focus on computational drug discovery methods, machine learning applications in materials science, protein structure and dynamics, chemical synthesis and analysis, innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques, genetics, bioinformatics, biomedical research, and bioinformatics and genomic networks.

Frequent co-authors include Esben Jannik Bjerrum, Lewis Mervin, Atanas Patronov, Jon Paul Janet, and Christian Tyrchan, indicating collaborative work in intersecting fields.

Engkvist's publication venues demonstrate a concentration in specialized journals and platforms related to cheminformatics and computational chemistry. The most prominent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Cheminformatics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Machine Learning Science and Technology

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and nature of Engkvist's scholarly output:

  • "Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide" (2020), Journal of Cheminformatics
  • "REINVENT 2.0: An AI Tool for De Novo Drug Design" (2020), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • "AiZynthFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning" (2020), Journal of Cheminformatics
  • "Building attention and edge message passing neural networks for bioactivity and physical-chemical property prediction" (2020), Journal of Cheminformatics
  • "Direct steering of de novo molecular generation with descriptor conditional recurrent neural networks" (2020), Nature Machine Intelligence

These works reflect contributions to AI-driven methodologies for drug discovery, retrosynthetic planning, and neural network architectures for predicting bioactivity and chemical properties, integrating artificial intelligence with chemistry and molecular biology.

Best Publications

  • The rise of deep learning in drug discovery.

    Hongming Chen;Ola Engkvist;Yinhai Wang;Marcus Olivecrona

  • Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning

    Marcus Olivecrona;Thomas Blaschke;Ola Engkvist;Hongming Chen

  • Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide

    Laurianne David;Amol Thakkar;Amol Thakkar;Rocío Mercado;Ola Engkvist

  • Application of Generative Autoencoder in De Novo Molecular Design.

    Thomas Blaschke;Marcus Olivecrona;Ola Engkvist;Jürgen Bajorath

  • REINVENT 2.0: An AI Tool for De Novo Drug Design.

    Thomas Blaschke;Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous;Hongming Chen;Christian Margreitter

  • A de novo molecular generation method using latent vector based generative adversarial network

    Oleksii Prykhodko;Oleksii Prykhodko;Simon Viet Johansson;Simon Viet Johansson;Panagiotis-Christos Kotsias;Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous

  • Randomized SMILES strings improve the quality of molecular generative models

    Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous;Simon Viet Johansson;Oleksii Prykhodko;Esben Jannik Bjerrum

  • AiZynthFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning

    Samuel Genheden;Amol Thakkar;Amol Thakkar;Veronika Chadimová;Jean-Louis Reymond

  • ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics

    Jiangming Sun;Nina Jeliazkova;Vladimir Chupakhin;Jose-Felipe Golib-Dzib

  • Current and Future Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Medicinal Chemistry Synthesis.

    Thomas J. Struble;Juan C. Alvarez;Scott P. Brown;Milan Chytil

  • On the integration of in silico drug design methods for drug repurposing

    Eric March-Vila;Luca Pinzi;Noé Sturm;Annachiara Tinivella

  • Direct steering of de novo molecular generation with descriptor conditional recurrent neural networks

    Panagiotis-Christos Kotsias;Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous;Hongming Chen;Ola Engkvist

  • SMILES-based deep generative scaffold decorator for de-novo drug design

    Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous;Atanas Patronov;Esben Jannik Bjerrum;Christian Tyrchan

  • Computational prediction of chemical reactions: current status and outlook.

    Ola Engkvist;Per-Ola Norrby;Nidhal Selmi;Yu-hong Lam

  • Exploring the GDB-13 chemical space using deep generative models

    Josep Arús-Pous;Josep Arús-Pous;Thomas Blaschke;Thomas Blaschke;Silas Ulander;Jean-Louis Reymond

  • Retrosynthetic accessibility score (RAscore) – rapid machine learned synthesizability classification from AI driven retrosynthetic planning

    Amol Thakkar;Amol Thakkar;Veronika Chadimová;Esben Jannik Bjerrum;Ola Engkvist

  • Graph networks for molecular design

    Rocío Mercado;Tobias Rastemo;Tobias Rastemo;Edvard Lindelöf;Edvard Lindelöf;Günter Klambauer

  • Datasets and their influence on the development of computer assisted synthesis planning tools in the pharmaceutical domain

    Amol Thakkar;Amol Thakkar;Thierry Kogej;Jean-Louis Reymond;Ola Engkvist

  • Target prediction utilising negative bioactivity data covering large chemical space

    Lewis H. Mervin;Avid M. Afzal;Georgios Drakakis;Richard Lewis

  • BIGCHEM: Challenges and Opportunities for Big Data Analysis in Chemistry

    Igor V. Tetko;Ola Engkvist;Uwe Koch;Jean-Louis Reymond

  • Molecular modeling of the second extracellular loop of G-protein coupled receptors and its implication on structure-based virtual screening.

    Chris de Graaf;Nicolas Foata;Ola Engkvist;Didier Rognan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Louis Reymond
Jean-Louis Reymond University of Bern
Andreas Bender
Andreas Bender University of Cambridge
Gunnar Karlström
Gunnar Karlström Lund University
Günter Klambauer
Günter Klambauer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Jürgen Bajorath
Jürgen Bajorath University of Bonn
Anthony J. Stone
Anthony J. Stone University of Cambridge
Pavel Hobza
Pavel Hobza Czech Academy of Sciences
Matthew Cotten
Matthew Cotten Wellcome Sanger Institute
Igor V. Tetko
Igor V. Tetko Helmholtz Zentrum München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up many flexible and diverse learning opportunities. For students mindful of cost and time, consider cheap online degrees fast—these options can help you earn your degree efficiently without stretching your budget.

Admission requirements for online programs also vary. If you’re concerned about your academic history, look into the best colleges for low gpa, as they offer accessible pathways for students from all educational backgrounds.

Career options with a computer science degree are vast, but if you’re still exploring, you might wonder, what can i do with an environmental science degree? This comparison can help you make an informed choice about your academic and career path.

For those eager to fast-track their learning, there are computer science degree online programs that are both accelerated and reputable, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Ola Engkvist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles